IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i2p309-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Vanpé
  • Petter Kjellander
  • Maxime Galan
  • Jean-François Cosson
  • Stéphane Aulagnier
  • Olof Liberg
  • A. J. Mark Hewison

Abstract

In mammals, species with high sexual size dimorphism tend to have highly polygynous mating systems associated with high variance in male lifetime reproductive success (LRS), leading to a high opportunity for sexual selection. However, little information is available for species with weak sexual size dimorphism. In a long-term study population, we used parentage analysis based on 21 microsatellite markers to describe, for the first time, variance in male lifetime breeding success (LBS) of roe deer, a territorial ungulate where males weigh less than 10% more than females. LBS ranged from 0 to 14 (mean = 4.54, variance = 15.5), and its distribution was highly skewed, with only a few males obtaining high LBS and many males failing to breed or siring only one fawn. As predicted for polygynous species with low sexual size dimorphism, the standardized variance in male LBS was low (I m = 0.75) and was only slightly higher than the standardized variance in female LRS (I f = 0.53), suggesting a low opportunity for sexual selection. The I m value reported here for roe deer is much lower than values reported for highly dimorphic ungulates such as red deer (I m > 3). We suggest that, along a continuum of opportunity for sexual selection, roe deer occupy a position closer to monogamous and monomorphic territorial ungulates than to highly polygynous, sexually dimorphic ungulates with dominance rank--based mating systems such as harems or roving mating systems. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Vanpé & Petter Kjellander & Maxime Galan & Jean-François Cosson & Stéphane Aulagnier & Olof Liberg & A. J. Mark Hewison, 2008. "Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 309-316.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:309-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giacomo D’Ammando & Daniel W Franks & Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, 2022. "Living in mixed-sex groups limits sexual selection as a driver of pelage dimorphism in bovids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(3), pages 541-548.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:309-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.