IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i5p1105-1112..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organization enhances collective vigilance in the hovering guards of Tetragonisca angustula bees

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle Shackleton
  • Denise A Alves
  • Francis L W Ratnieks

Abstract

Many animals display vigilance behaviors in order to detect predators. We found that the guards of a social bee coordinate their vigilance, which increases nest defense. Guards hover and distribute themselves evenly around the nest entrance. This increases the group’s field of view and ability to detect predators. We discuss how and why this organized pattern might arise.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle Shackleton & Denise A Alves & Francis L W Ratnieks, 2018. "Organization enhances collective vigilance in the hovering guards of Tetragonisca angustula bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1105-1112.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:5:p:1105-1112.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenth, Russell V., 2016. "Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i01).
    2. Christoph Grüter & Francisca H. I. D. Segers & Cristiano Menezes & Ayrton Vollet-Neto & Tiago Falcón & Lucas von Zuben & Márcia M. G. Bitondi & Fabio S. Nascimento & Eduardo A. B. Almeida, 2017. "Repeated evolution of soldier sub-castes suggests parasitism drives social complexity in stingless bees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Guy Beauchamp, 2017. "The spatial distribution of foragers and food patches can influence antipredator vigilance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(1), pages 304-311.
    4. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean Coogan & Zhixian Sui & David Raubenheimer, 2018. "Gluttony and guilt: monthly trends in internet search query data are comparable with national-level energy intake and dieting behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Muhammad Javed ASIF & Deivaseeno Dorairaj & Ratnam Wickneswari, 2017. "Characterization of natural provenances of Acacia mangium Willd. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. in Malaysia based on phenotypic traits," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 562-576.
    4. Belinda A Wilson & Maldwyn J Evans & William G Batson & Sam C Banks & Iain J Gordon & Donald B Fletcher & Claire Wimpenny & Jenny Newport & Emily Belton & Annette Rypalski & Tim Portas & Adrian D Mann, 2020. "Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Sławomir Kujawski & Agnieszka Kujawska & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Djordje G. Jakovljevic & Błażej Stankiewicz & Julia L. Newton & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska & Paweł Zalewski, 2022. "Effects of Sitting Callisthenic Balance and Resistance Exercise Programs on Cognitive Function in Older Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Ayse Ilkay Isik & Edward A Vessel, 2019. "Continuous ratings of movie watching reveal idiosyncratic dynamics of aesthetic enjoyment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Philip Amoah & Noah Adamtey & Olufunke Cofie, 2017. "Effect of Urine, Poultry Manure, and Dewatered Faecal Sludge on Agronomic Characteristics of Cabbage in Accra, Ghana," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Jozef N. Coppelmans & Fieke M. A. Wagemans & Lotte F. Dillen, 2024. "An empirical investigation of emotion and the criminal law: towards a “criminalization bias”?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Jo Dorning & Stephen Harris, 2017. "Dominance, gender, and season influence food patch use in a group-living, solitary foraging canid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1302-1313.
    10. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    11. Anna Zimmermann & Julian E. Prieto-Vivas & Charlotte Cautereels & Anton Gorkovskiy & Jan Steensels & Yves Peer & Kevin J. Verstrepen, 2023. "A Cas3-base editing tool for targetable in vivo mutagenesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Patrizia Piotti & Juliane Kaminski, 2016. "Do Dogs Provide Information Helpfully?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Karis J. McFarlane & Daniela F. Cusack & Lee H. Dietterich & Alexandra L. Hedgpeth & Kari M. Finstad & Andrew T. Nottingham, 2024. "Experimental warming and drying increase older carbon contributions to soil respiration in lowland tropical forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Marion Chatelain, 2023. "Endogeic Earthworms Avoid Soil Mimicking Metal Pollution Levels in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Francisco Ruiz-Raya & Jose C Noguera & Alberto Velando, 2022. "Light received by embryos promotes postnatal junior phenotypes in a seabird [The evolution of social behavior]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1047-1057.
    16. Thomas Dubois & Susan K. Onsongo & Evanson R. Omuse & Joseph A. Odhiambo & Komivi S. Akutse & Samira A. Mohamed, 2023. "Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae against the Greater Pumpkin Fly Dacus bivitattus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-11, September.
    17. Samuel P Caro & Léo Pierre & Matthieu Bergès & Raldi Bakker & Claire Doutrelant & Francesco Bonadonna, 2021. "Mutual mate preferences and assortative mating in relation to a carotenoid-based color trait in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1171-1182.
    18. Wieme, Rachel A. & Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne A. & Crowder, David W. & Murphy, Kevin M. & Reganold, John P., 2020. "Agronomic and economic performance of organic forage, quinoa, and grain crop rotations in the Palouse region of the Pacific Northwest, USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Raymond Hernandez & Elizabeth A. Pyatak & Cheryl L. P. Vigen & Haomiao Jin & Stefan Schneider & Donna Spruijt-Metz & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Understanding Worker Well-Being Relative to High-Workload and Recovery Activities across a Whole Day: Pilot Testing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:5:p:1105-1112.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.