IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13185-d1231347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae against the Greater Pumpkin Fly Dacus bivitattus

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Dubois

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Susan K. Onsongo

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Evanson R. Omuse

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Joseph A. Odhiambo

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Komivi S. Akutse

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Samira A. Mohamed

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

Abstract

The greater pumpkin fly Dacus bivittatus (Bigot) is a fruit fly indigenous to Africa, which causes extensive damage to Cucurbitaceae. To control this pest, farmers rely on synthetic chemicals, often organophosphates, which have negative effects on human health and the environment. However, the sustainable management of D. bivittatus may be obtained through integrated pest management (IPM) practices, with the use of biopesticides as a key component. In this study, the effect of nine isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (ICIPE 18, ICIPE 20, ICIPE 30, ICIPE 48, ICIPE 62, ICIPE 69, ICIPE 84, ICIPE 91 and ICIPE 94) was directly evaluated on adult D. bivittatus mortality. Adult flies were allowed to walk for 5 min on 0.3 g of dry conidia of each isolate and monitored daily for 10 days. We also evaluated the effect of sand inoculated with M. anisopliae on larval and pupal mortality and adult eclosion and mortality in three replicated experiments. Larvae were exposed to the same isolates at a concentration of 1 × 10 7 conidia/mL in sterile sand, and adult eclosion and mortality were monitored for 15 days. The median lethal time (LT 50 ) of adults after direct exposure was shortest for ICIPE 18, ICIPE 20, ICIPE 30 and ICIPE 69 (3.11–3.52 days). In infested sand, larval mortality was highest for ICIPE 18 and ICIPE 20 (≥42.50%), while pupal mortality was highest for ICIPE 30 (≥41.25%). The lowest eclosion was observed for ICIPE 18, ICIPE 20, ICIPE 30 and ICIPE 69 (≤40.00%). The LT 50 of adults eclosed from infested sand was shortest for ICIPE 18, ICIPE 20 and ICIPE 30 (4.48–6.95 days). ICIPE 18, ICIPE 20, ICIPE 30 and ICIPE 69 are, therefore, potential isolates for subsequent field testing on D. bivittatus populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Dubois & Susan K. Onsongo & Evanson R. Omuse & Joseph A. Odhiambo & Komivi S. Akutse & Samira A. Mohamed, 2023. "Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae against the Greater Pumpkin Fly Dacus bivitattus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13185-:d:1231347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kibira, M & Affognon, H & Njehia, B & Muriithi, B & Mohamed, S & Ekesi, S, 2015. "Economic evaluation of integrated management of fruit fly in mango production in Embu County, Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    3. Lenth, Russell V., 2016. "Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean Coogan & Zhixian Sui & David Raubenheimer, 2018. "Gluttony and guilt: monthly trends in internet search query data are comparable with national-level energy intake and dieting behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    4. Anna Zimmermann & Julian E. Prieto-Vivas & Charlotte Cautereels & Anton Gorkovskiy & Jan Steensels & Yves Peer & Kevin J. Verstrepen, 2023. "A Cas3-base editing tool for targetable in vivo mutagenesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Muhammad Javed ASIF & Deivaseeno Dorairaj & Ratnam Wickneswari, 2017. "Characterization of natural provenances of Acacia mangium Willd. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. in Malaysia based on phenotypic traits," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 562-576.
    6. Belinda A Wilson & Maldwyn J Evans & William G Batson & Sam C Banks & Iain J Gordon & Donald B Fletcher & Claire Wimpenny & Jenny Newport & Emily Belton & Annette Rypalski & Tim Portas & Adrian D Mann, 2020. "Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Patrizia Piotti & Juliane Kaminski, 2016. "Do Dogs Provide Information Helpfully?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Karis J. McFarlane & Daniela F. Cusack & Lee H. Dietterich & Alexandra L. Hedgpeth & Kari M. Finstad & Andrew T. Nottingham, 2024. "Experimental warming and drying increase older carbon contributions to soil respiration in lowland tropical forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Marion Chatelain, 2023. "Endogeic Earthworms Avoid Soil Mimicking Metal Pollution Levels in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Sławomir Kujawski & Agnieszka Kujawska & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Djordje G. Jakovljevic & Błażej Stankiewicz & Julia L. Newton & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska & Paweł Zalewski, 2022. "Effects of Sitting Callisthenic Balance and Resistance Exercise Programs on Cognitive Function in Older Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Francisco Ruiz-Raya & Jose C Noguera & Alberto Velando, 2022. "Light received by embryos promotes postnatal junior phenotypes in a seabird [The evolution of social behavior]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1047-1057.
    12. Ayse Ilkay Isik & Edward A Vessel, 2019. "Continuous ratings of movie watching reveal idiosyncratic dynamics of aesthetic enjoyment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Kyle Shackleton & Denise A Alves & Francis L W Ratnieks, 2018. "Organization enhances collective vigilance in the hovering guards of Tetragonisca angustula bees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1105-1112.
    14. Samuel P Caro & Léo Pierre & Matthieu Bergès & Raldi Bakker & Claire Doutrelant & Francesco Bonadonna, 2021. "Mutual mate preferences and assortative mating in relation to a carotenoid-based color trait in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1171-1182.
    15. Philip Amoah & Noah Adamtey & Olufunke Cofie, 2017. "Effect of Urine, Poultry Manure, and Dewatered Faecal Sludge on Agronomic Characteristics of Cabbage in Accra, Ghana," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Wieme, Rachel A. & Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne A. & Crowder, David W. & Murphy, Kevin M. & Reganold, John P., 2020. "Agronomic and economic performance of organic forage, quinoa, and grain crop rotations in the Palouse region of the Pacific Northwest, USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Jozef N. Coppelmans & Fieke M. A. Wagemans & Lotte F. Dillen, 2024. "An empirical investigation of emotion and the criminal law: towards a “criminalization bias”?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Jo Dorning & Stephen Harris, 2017. "Dominance, gender, and season influence food patch use in a group-living, solitary foraging canid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1302-1313.
    19. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Raymond Hernandez & Elizabeth A. Pyatak & Cheryl L. P. Vigen & Haomiao Jin & Stefan Schneider & Donna Spruijt-Metz & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Understanding Worker Well-Being Relative to High-Workload and Recovery Activities across a Whole Day: Pilot Testing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13185-:d:1231347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.