IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i6p1327-1338..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual dimorphism in a feeding apparatus is driven by mate choice and not niche partitioning

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Olsen
  • Russell Greenberg
  • Jeffrey R. Walters
  • Robert C. Fleischer

Abstract

The evolutionary origins of sexual dimorphism are credited to both natural and sexual selection. Sexual dimorphism in feeding structures, however, provides some of the clearest examples of ecologically driven dimorphism. Studies of bird bills have significantly aided these claims, but bird bills are also commonly used in pair formation behaviors, and thus their morphology could be subject to sexual selection. We tested 4 hypotheses of the evolution of sexual dimorphism using the feeding structure of a sexually dimorphic and a nondimorphic subspecies of the swamp sparrow, Melospiza georgiana. The increased bill volume of males was not explained by simple allometric relationships, ecological niche divergence between the sexes, or correlations with territory defense. Male bill volume was positively selected by female mate choice, as relative male bill volume predicted both the presence of and degree of cuckoldry. Further, male bill volume increased with age, and females may thus receive benefits by choosing larger billed males for social (direct benefits) or extrapair (indirect benefits) mates. It is clear from this example that sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of sexually dimorphic feeding structures, even in bird bills, which are a classic system for ecologically driven sexual dimorphism.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Olsen & Russell Greenberg & Jeffrey R. Walters & Robert C. Fleischer, 2013. "Sexual dimorphism in a feeding apparatus is driven by mate choice and not niche partitioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1327-1338.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1327-1338.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel J. Mennill & Scott M. Ramsay & Peter T. Boag & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2004. "Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 757-765, September.
    2. Ste´phanie M. Doucet & Robert Montgomerie, 2003. "Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 503-509, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Rico-Guevara & Marcelo Araya-Salas, 2015. "Editor's choice Bills as daggers? A test for sexually dimorphic weapons in a lekking hummingbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 21-29.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Grava & T. Grava & R. Didier & L. A. Lait & J. Dosso & E. Koran & T. M. Burg & K. A. Otter, 2012. "Interspecific dominance relationships and hybridization between black-capped and mountain chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 566-572.
    2. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Experimentally advancing morning emergence time does not increase extra-pair siring success in blue tit males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 346-353.
    3. Sarah Guindre-Parker & H. Grant Gilchrist & Sarah Baldo & Stephanie M. Doucet & Oliver P. Love, 2013. "Multiple achromatic plumage ornaments signal to multiple receivers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 672-682.
    4. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2013. "Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1048-1057.
    5. Cory A. Toth & Daniel J. Mennill & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2012. "Evidence for multicontest eavesdropping in chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 836-842.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1327-1338.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.