IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i4p503-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality

Author

Listed:
  • Ste´phanie M. Doucet
  • Robert Montgomerie

Abstract

Much attention has been devoted to understanding the evolution of elaborate male ornaments and how they may signal male quality. However, the evolution of multicomponent sexual signals remains poorly understood, and past research on this type of signaling has been largely theoretical. Satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus, are polygynous, are sexually dichromatic, and construct sexually selected display structures (bowers): a model system for investigating the evolution and signal function of multiple sexual signals. We studied the interrelationship between bower features, plumage coloration, and indicators of male quality in this species. To do this, we located the bowers of male satin bowerbirds in rainforest in Queensland, Australia, and quantified bower quality. We captured the male bower owners and used reflectance spectrometry to objectively measure the plumage coloration of several body regions. We measured various indicators of male health and condition, including the intensity of infection from ectoparasites and blood parasites. Bower quality and male ultraviolet plumage coloration were significantly correlated. By using multiple regression analyses, we show that bower quality predicts ectoparasite load and body size, whereas ultraviolet plumage coloration predicts the intensity of infection from blood parasites, feather growth rate, and body size. Our findings support the multiple messages hypothesis of multicomponent signals: Female satin bowerbirds should assess both male and bower features to choose the highest quality mates. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Ste´phanie M. Doucet & Robert Montgomerie, 2003. "Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 503-509, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:503-509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian J. Olsen & Russell Greenberg & Jeffrey R. Walters & Robert C. Fleischer, 2013. "Sexual dimorphism in a feeding apparatus is driven by mate choice and not niche partitioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1327-1338.
    2. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2013. "Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1048-1057.
    3. Sarah Guindre-Parker & H. Grant Gilchrist & Sarah Baldo & Stephanie M. Doucet & Oliver P. Love, 2013. "Multiple achromatic plumage ornaments signal to multiple receivers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 672-682.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:503-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.