IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i4p836-842..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence for multicontest eavesdropping in chickadees

Author

Listed:
  • Cory A. Toth
  • Daniel J. Mennill
  • Laurene M. Ratcliffe

Abstract

Animals eavesdrop on dyadic interactions between other individuals to gather information for future mate choice and territory defense decisions. The capacity for eavesdroppers to combine information gathered from overhearing multiple two-way interactions is poorly studied. We tested whether inexperienced (second year) and older (after second year) male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) eavesdrop on rivals' song contests to evaluate the relative threat levels of multiple unfamiliar territorial intruders. We used a multiple speaker playback experiment to simulate 3 male territorial intruders (A, B, and C) engaging in 2 successive dyadic song contests, presenting focal males with the information that A was more threatening than B, and B was more threatening than C. We then assayed the response of focal males when presented with simulated intruders A and C without relative information. We predicted that males would defend against the intruder perceived to be the greater threat. Focal males initially responded toward the more threatening intruder (A) significantly more than the less threatening intruder (C), consistent with our predictions. Older birds approached the more threatening intruder (A) significantly more than the less threatening intruder (C), whereas young males showed more variable responses. Our results suggest that male chickadees were able to acquire relative threat information from separate song contests that influenced their responses toward rivals paired in novel contests. These findings indicate that territorial songbirds in communication networks may be capable of integrating information gathered through eavesdropping on multiple interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cory A. Toth & Daniel J. Mennill & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2012. "Evidence for multicontest eavesdropping in chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 836-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:836-842.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel P. Caro & Kendra B. Sewall & Katrina G. Salvante & Keith W. Sockman, 2010. "Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 562-569.
    2. Daniel J. Mennill & Scott M. Ramsay & Peter T. Boag & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2004. "Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 757-765, September.
    3. Lauren P. Fitzsimmons & Jennifer R. Foote & Laurene M. Ratcliffe & Daniel J. Mennill, 2008. "Eavesdropping and communication networks revealed through playback and an acoustic location system," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 824-829.
    4. Jennifer R. Foote & Lauren P. Fitzsimmons & Daniel J. Mennill & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2008. "Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1192-1199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2013. "Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 393-401.
    2. Sandra L. Vehrencamp & Jesse M. Ellis & Brett F. Cropp & John M. Koltz, 2014. "Negotiation of territorial boundaries in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1436-1450.
    3. A. Grava & T. Grava & R. Didier & L. A. Lait & J. Dosso & E. Koran & T. M. Burg & K. A. Otter, 2012. "Interspecific dominance relationships and hybridization between black-capped and mountain chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 566-572.
    4. Brian J. Olsen & Russell Greenberg & Jeffrey R. Walters & Robert C. Fleischer, 2013. "Sexual dimorphism in a feeding apparatus is driven by mate choice and not niche partitioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1327-1338.
    5. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Experimentally advancing morning emergence time does not increase extra-pair siring success in blue tit males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 346-353.
    6. Emily R.A. Cramer, 2013. "Vocal deviation and trill consistency do not affect male response to playback in house wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 412-420.
    7. Samuel P Caro & Léo Pierre & Matthieu Bergès & Raldi Bakker & Claire Doutrelant & Francesco Bonadonna, 2021. "Mutual mate preferences and assortative mating in relation to a carotenoid-based color trait in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1171-1182.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:836-842.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.