IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1048-1057..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success

Author

Listed:
  • Roslyn Dakin
  • Robert Montgomerie

Abstract

Each of the multicolored eyespots (ocelli) on the peacock’s (Pavo cristatus) train is a complex structure with a purple-black center surrounded by concentric blue-green and bronze-gold regions. To investigate the influence of all 3 of these colors on male mating success, we used a physiological model of peafowl vision to quantify those colors as females would perceive them during male courtship displays. Males display at about 45° to the right of the sun’s azimuth (on average) with the female directly in front, so we investigated how colors would be perceived when illuminated at 30°, 45°, and 60° to the right of a female observer. We studied 34 males displaying at leks in 3 feral populations and quantified their copulation success and the colors of their eyespots. Eyespot coloration explained half of the observed variation in peacock mating success, with the hue and iridescence of the blue-green patch being the most important color variables. When we experimentally masked ocelli on 9 males, their copulation success declined almost to 0, supporting the idea that the eyespots are a major focus of female attention and not a trait that is simply correlated with something else that influences female choice. Thus, our study shows that the blue-green eyespot color overwhelmingly influences peacock mating success. The influence of the other eyespot colors on male success is minimal at best, raising questions about their function.

Suggested Citation

  • Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2013. "Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1048-1057.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1048-1057.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adeline Loyau & Doris Gomez & Benoit Moureau & Marc Théry & Nathan S. Hart & Michel Saint Jalme & Andrew T.D. Bennett & Gabriele Sorci, 2007. "Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1123-1131.
    2. Ste´phanie M. Doucet & Robert Montgomerie, 2003. "Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 503-509, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.
    2. Brian J. Olsen & Russell Greenberg & Jeffrey R. Walters & Robert C. Fleischer, 2013. "Sexual dimorphism in a feeding apparatus is driven by mate choice and not niche partitioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1327-1338.
    3. Darrell J. Kemp & Marie E. Herberstein & Gregory F. Grether, 2012. "Unraveling the true complexity of costly color signaling," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 233-236.
    4. Sarah Guindre-Parker & H. Grant Gilchrist & Sarah Baldo & Stephanie M. Doucet & Oliver P. Love, 2013. "Multiple achromatic plumage ornaments signal to multiple receivers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 672-682.
    5. Thomas W. Pike, 2012. "Preserving perceptual distances in chromaticity diagrams," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 723-728.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1048-1057.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.