IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1162-1169..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simultaneous mate-sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa)

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher G. Murphy

Abstract

Mate-sampling behavior describes how individuals gather information about potential mates and incorporate that information into mating decisions. Conclusively identifying the mate-sampling tactic employed by choosing individuals has proved difficult for many species. To determine the sampling tactic used by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa), I conducted 8-speaker playback experiments in which the speakers were arrayed along an arc that mimicked the natural spatial distribution of males confronting choosing females. One speaker broadcast an attractive call, whereas the other 7 broadcast an unattractive call; the speaker broadcasting the attractive call was never the closest to the female’s release point. Females bypassed the closest speakers to choose the more distant, more attractive call when they had to travel an additional 1.4 or 2.8 m to reach the speaker broadcasting the attractive call; they did not prefer the more attractive call if they had to travel an additional 5.8 m. To determine the number of males sampled by females, I held constant the additional distance required to reach the speaker broadcasting the more attractive call while at the same time varying the total number of speakers located within that distance of the release point. The results of these experiments showed that all females sampled at least 4 speakers and that some sampled as many as 8. These results establish experimentally that female H. gratiosa sample males simultaneously from a distance and that they trade off call characteristics and distance to potential mates when choosing mates.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher G. Murphy, 2012. "Simultaneous mate-sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1162-1169.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1162-1169.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme D. Ruxton, 2006. "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann--Whitney U test," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(4), pages 688-690, July.
    2. Shinichi Nakagawa, 2004. "A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1044-1045, November.
    3. Christopher G. Murphy & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2002. "Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(4), pages 472-480, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rittik Deb & Rohini Balakrishnan, 2014. "The opportunity for sampling: the ecological context of female mate choice," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 967-974.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Wenjin & Tang, Ke & Wang, Ningli, 2023. "Financialization of commodity markets ten years later," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    2. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Kim Young Joo & Skibniewski Miroslaw J., 2020. "Unsuccessful bids: Coefficient of variation of bids as indicator of project risk," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2193-2199, January.
    4. Wallert, John & Ekman, Urban & Westman, Eric & Madison, Guy, 2017. "The worst performance rule with elderly in abnormal cognitive decline," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 9-17.
    5. Gerad A Fox & Allen M Cooper & William K Hayes, 2015. "The Dilemma of Choosing a Reference Character for Measuring Sexual Size Dimorphism, Sexual Body Component Dimorphism, and Character Scaling: Cryptic Dimorphism and Allometry in the Scorpion Hadrurus a," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Fullman, Timothy J. & Bunting, Erin L. & Kiker, Gregory A. & Southworth, Jane, 2017. "Predicting shifts in large herbivore distributions under climate change and management using a spatially-explicit ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Tamar Balgiashvili, 2017. "Comparing Entrepreneurial Passion of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 45-61.
    8. Bunting, Erin L. & Fullman, Timothy & Kiker, Gregory & Southworth, Jane, 2016. "Utilization of the SAVANNA model to analyze future patterns of vegetation cover in Kruger National Park under changing climate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 147-160.
    9. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.
    10. Roberto Bonanni & Simona Cafazzo & Arianna Abis & Emanuela Barillari & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2017. "Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1004-1020.
    11. R. C. Rodríguez-Caro & E. Graciá & S. P. Blomberg & H. Cayuela & M. Grace & C. P. Carmona & H. A. Pérez-Mendoza & A. Giménez & R. Salguero-Gómez, 2023. "Anthropogenic impacts on threatened species erode functional diversity in chelonians and crocodilians," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Tilov, Ivan & Weber, Sylvain, 2023. "Heterogeneity in price elasticity of vehicle kilometers traveled: Evidence from micro-level panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    13. Bernd W. Wirtz & Oliver Tuna Kurtz, 2017. "Determinants of Citizen Usage Intentions in e-Government: An Empirical Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 353-372, September.
    14. Charles Bettembourg & Christian Diot & Olivier Dameron, 2015. "Optimal Threshold Determination for Interpreting Semantic Similarity and Particularity: Application to the Comparison of Gene Sets and Metabolic Pathways Using GO and ChEBI," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Yankol-Schalck, Meryem, 2022. "The value of cross-data set analysis for automobile insurance fraud detection," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Isaías Martín-Ruiz & María-José Robles-Sánchez & Agustín Wallace, 2024. "Influence of Educational Measures on Emotional Adjustment in Students with and without Specific Learning Difficulties according to Gender," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Gaspard Philis & Friederike Ziegler & Lars Christian Gansel & Mona Dverdal Jansen & Erik Olav Gracey & Anne Stene, 2019. "Comparing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Salmonid Aquaculture Production Systems: Status and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Qi Zhang & Zuobin Ying & Jianhang Zhou & Jingzhang Sun & Bob Zhang, 2023. "Broad Learning Model with a Dual Feature Extraction Strategy for Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. R. Nicholas Carleton & Tracie O. Afifi & Tamara Taillieu & Sarah Turner & Julia E. Mason & Rosemary Ricciardelli & Donald R. McCreary & Adam D. Vaughan & Gregory S. Anderson & Rachel L. Krakauer & Eli, 2020. "Assessing the Relative Impact of Diverse Stressors among Public Safety Personnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Chamil W SENARATHNE & Wei JIANGUO, 2020. "Testing for Heteroskedastic Mixture of Ordinary Least Squares Errors," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 73-91, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1162-1169.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.