IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1192-1199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer R. Foote
  • Lauren P. Fitzsimmons
  • Daniel J. Mennill
  • Laurene M. Ratcliffe

Abstract

Males of many songbird species participate in a distinct chorus beginning before sunrise. Despite its ubiquity, the function of dawn chorusing remains poorly understood. We tested the social dynamics hypothesis, which states that males sing at dawn to mediate their social relationships with neighbors through interactive communication. Using a 16-microphone acoustic location system, we recorded 29 entire dawn choruses in 10 neighborhoods of 6--10 territorial male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) of known dominance rank. We analyzed song frequency matching and overlapping between neighboring males in 10 choruses and compared the intensity of these behaviors with social factors. Chickadees matched the frequency of their neighbor's songs more often than expected by chance. The level of matching was higher between neighbors who belonged to different flocks during the previous winter than between neighbors who had been flockmates. Males of the same dominance rank matched each other more than males of disparate ranks. There was no relationship between matching and pairing status or distance between opponents. Overlapping was used less than expected by chance. No measures of song overlapping were related to measured social factors. Our results show that neighboring male chickadees interact vocally at dawn by frequency matching. This is the first study to show that the intensity of songbird vocal interactions at dawn varies with social factors, supporting the social dynamics hypothesis. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer R. Foote & Lauren P. Fitzsimmons & Daniel J. Mennill & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2008. "Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1192-1199.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1192-1199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cory A. Toth & Daniel J. Mennill & Laurene M. Ratcliffe, 2012. "Evidence for multicontest eavesdropping in chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 836-842.
    2. Sandra L. Vehrencamp & Jesse M. Ellis & Brett F. Cropp & John M. Koltz, 2014. "Negotiation of territorial boundaries in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1436-1450.
    3. Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2013. "Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 393-401.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1192-1199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.