IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i4p1005-1014..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests of the kin selection model of mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in satin bowerbirds

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila M. Reynolds
  • J. Albert C. Uy
  • Gail L. Patricelli
  • Seth W. Coleman
  • Michael J. Braun
  • Gerald Borgia

Abstract

In typically outbreeding species, females can avoid a reduction in offspring fitness by choosing unrelated sires. However, the kin selection model of mate choice suggests that it may be adaptive to mate with relatives to gain inclusive fitness benefits, especially in lekking species. Several studies have shown that females tend to mate with relatives, but the detailed behavioral data necessary to determine whether this reflects an active preference is difficult to acquire. We test the hypotheses that females actively preferred or avoided relatives in mate choice in satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), a lekking species in which comprehensive observations of natural mate choice were obtained using automated video cameras positioned at bowers. We identified specific males that were sampled by individual females and assessed whether relatedness influenced their acceptance or rejection as mates. We found no consistent effect of relatedness on mate choice across years or among multiple stages of mate choice. In 2 of 6 years, females copulated with relatives at or above the half-sibling level significantly more often than expected, but this was attributed to females searching for mates in areas populated by relatives, and not to an active preference for relatives. Furthermore, we found no evidence for inbreeding avoidance through mate choice discrimination or sex-biased dispersal.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila M. Reynolds & J. Albert C. Uy & Gail L. Patricelli & Seth W. Coleman & Michael J. Braun & Gerald Borgia, 2014. "Tests of the kin selection model of mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in satin bowerbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 1005-1014.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:1005-1014.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Eimes & Patricia G. Parker & Jerram L. Brown & Esther R. Brown, 2005. "Extrapair fertilization and genetic similarity of social mates in the Mexican jay," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 456-460, March.
    2. Tom Van de Casteele & Peter Galbusera & Tine Schenck & Erik Matthysen, 2003. "Seasonal and lifetime reproductive consequences of inbreeding in the great tit Parus major," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 165-174, March.
    3. Sheila M. Reynolds & Mary C. Christman & J. Albert C. Uy & Gail L. Patricelli & Michael J. Braun & Gerald Borgia, 2009. "Lekking satin bowerbird males aggregate with relatives to mitigate aggression," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 410-415.
    4. Corey R. Freeman-Gallant & Nathaniel T. Wheelwright & Katherine E. Meiklejohn & Suzanne V. Sollecito, 2006. "Genetic similarity, extrapair paternity, and offspring quality in Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 952-958, November.
    5. Jussi S. Alho & Céline Teplitsky & James A. Mills & John W. Yarrall & Juha Merilä, 2012. "No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 672-675.
    6. T.B. Ryder & W.P. Tori & J.G. Blake & B.A. Loiselle & P.G. Parker, 2010. "Mate choice for genetic quality: a test of the heterozygosity and compatibility hypotheses in a lek-breeding bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 203-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Pruett-Jones & Aviad Heifetz, 2012. "Optimal marauding in bowerbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 607-614.
    2. Patricia Brekke & Jinliang Wang & Peter M. Bennett & Phillip Cassey & Deborah A. Dawson & Gavin J. Horsburgh & John G. Ewen, 2012. "Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 278-284.
    3. Nicholas M A Crouch & Roberta J Mason-Gamer, 2018. "Structural equation modeling as a tool to investigate correlates of extra-pair paternity in birds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Vasudev, Divya & Fletcher Jr, Robert J., 2016. "Mate choice interacts with movement limitations to influence effective dispersal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 65-73.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:1005-1014.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.