IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v6y2021i2p57-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Management, Competitive Advantage And Organizational Performance In The Nigerian Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Efosa Abiodun Oshodin

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria)

  • Omorodion Omoregbe

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the impact of supply chain management practices (SCMP): strategic supplier partnership, customer relationship, level of information shared, and information quality on competitive advantage and organizational performance in the Nigerian manufacturing sector. In so doing, this study was set out to find out if these practices generate conditions that promote higher or lesser competitive advantage and organizational performance. The survey research design was adopted because the characteristics of the respondents were fully captured in other to make important decisions. A total number of 122 were found usable out of 146 copies of questionnaire circulated. The structural equation modelling (SEM) was the estimation technique employed to measure the relationships among the various variables/constructs using AMOS 22.0. It was found out that the four predictors (strategic supplier partnership, customer relationship, level of information shared, information quality) of SCMP had significant impact on organizational performance. The study also revealed that of the four independent variables, three (strategic supplier partnership, customer relationship, and level of information shared) had significant impact on competitive advantage, while information quality had no significant impact on competitive advantage. In response to our research questions, we concluded that the four constructs or predictors generate conditions that promote higher competitive advantage and organizational performance in the Nigerian manufacturing sector. The study recommended that manufacturing organizations should share quality, timely and accurate information to ensure their product offerings can be altered to meet customers while offering competitive prices. The study further recommended that organizations should assist its suppliers to improve product quality; regularly relate with clients to set dependability, receptiveness, and other standards; notify trading partners early when changing needs arises; and have fast product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Efosa Abiodun Oshodin & Omorodion Omoregbe, 2021. "Supply Chain Management, Competitive Advantage And Organizational Performance In The Nigerian Manufacturing Sector," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 57-68, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:57-68
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OJBE-62-57-68.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meirani Harsasi & Minrohayati, 2017. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 240-247.
    2. Childerhouse, Paul & Towill, Denis R., 2003. "Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 17-27, February.
    3. Ebrahim Karimi & Mahmoud Rafiee, 2014. "Analyzing the Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Organizational Performance through Competitive Priorities (Case Study: Iran Pumps Company)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Rotimi A. Gbadeyan & Francis O. Boachie-Mensah & Olubunmi F. Osemene, 2017. "Effect Of Supply Chain Management On Performance In Selected Private Hospitals In Ilorin, Nigeria," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 7(1), pages 99-116.
    5. Feldmann, Martin & Müller, Stephanie, 2003. "An incentive scheme for true information providing in Supply Chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 63-73, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banerjee, Mohua & Mishra, Manit, 2017. "Retail supply chain management practices in India: A business intelligence perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 248-259.
    2. Li, Suhong & Ragu-Nathan, Bhanu & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Subba Rao, S., 2006. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 107-124, April.
    3. Danese, Pamela, 2013. "Supplier integration and company performance: A configurational view," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1041.
    4. Wangungu J. & Robert Gichira, 2014. "Influence of Supply Chain Management Practices to Branding In Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industry in Kenya A Case Study of Thika Small and Medium Enterprises," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(9), pages 251-264, September.
    5. Wang, Deshen & Chen, Bintong & Chen, Jing, 2019. "Credit card fraud detection strategies with consumer incentives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 179-195.
    6. Olema Hamiza & Alain Vilard Ndi Isoh, 2019. "Supply Chain Management Practices and SME Performance in Arua Municipality, Uganda," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 163-180, December.
    7. Mou, W.M. & Wong, W.-K. & McAleer, M.J., 2018. "Financial Credit Risk and Core Enterprise Supply Chains," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-27, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Subanidja Steph & Hadiwidjojo Djumilah, 2017. "The influence of knowledge management “bottleneck” on company’s performance," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 402-415, September.
    9. Changjoon Lee & Byoung-Chun Ha, 2021. "Interactional Justice, Informational Quality, and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comparison of Domestic and Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. WeiMing Mou & Wing-Keung Wong & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Financial Credit Risk Evaluation Based on Core Enterprise Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Ioannis Koliousis & Heather McLaughlin, 2021. "Making sense of maritime supply chain: a relationship marketing approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Zahid Hussain & Ahmad Bin Jusoh & Muhammad Sarfraz & Khalil Ur Rehman Wahla, 2018. "Uncovering the Relationship of Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Evidence from Textile Sector of Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 10(2), pages 23-29.
    13. Vijayasarathy, Leo R., 2010. "Supply integration: An investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 489-505, April.
    14. Wu, Jianghua & Zhai, Xin & Huang, Zhimin, 2008. "Incentives for information sharing in duopoly with capacity constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 963-975, December.
    15. Manijeh Teimori, 2014. "Effect of Information Security Management in Automotive Supply Chains to Reduce appetite Boosting Orders," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(7), pages 316-324, July.
    16. Xiaowei Hu & Jaejin Jang & Nabeel Hamoud & Amirsaman Bajgiran, 2021. "Strategic Inventories in a Supply Chain with Downstream Cournot Duopoly," Papers 2109.06995, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    17. Roberto Chavez, 2014. "Customer integration, information quality and operational performance: A social capital view," Working Papers 57, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad Diego Portales.
    18. Alma Spaho, 2011. "Determinants of Information Sharing in Supply Chain among Manufacturing and Trading companies in Albania: A Discriminant Analysis," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 29, pages 75-85, August.
    19. van Donk, Dirk Pieter & van der Vaart, Taco, 2005. "A case of shared resources, uncertainty and supply chain integration in the process industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 97-108, April.
    20. K. T. Shibin & Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Benjamin Hazen & David Roubaud & Shivam Gupta & Cyril Foropon, 2020. "Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 301-326, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitive Advantage; Organizational Performance; Supply Chain Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:57-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.