IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6678-d827685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Critical Capabilities and Improvement Areas for Competitive Manufacturing in a Developed-Country Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Ascic

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden)

  • Josip Ascic

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden)

  • Per Hilletofth

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden
    Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Márcio Lopes Pimenta

    (Management and Business College, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. João Naves de Ávila, 2121, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil)

  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola

    (Kouvola Unit, LUT University, Tykkitie 1, FIN-45100 Kouvola, Finland
    Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology (Taltech), Kopli 101, 11712 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

This research evaluates the critical capabilities and improvement areas for competitive manufacturing in a developed-country environment. A multiple-case-study approach is applied, consisting of three manufacturing firms located in Sweden. The case study combines both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the critical capabilities found in the extant literature. The research reveals fifteen critical capabilities and sixteen improvement areas for competitive manufacturing in a developed-country environment. The results show that the firms develop capabilities in a cumulative manner, starting with cost and quality, continuing with time and flexibility, and finally trying to improve innovation and sustainability. To develop competitive manufacturing operations in developed counties, it is therefore vital to improve capabilities related to time, flexibility, innovation, or sustainability. Irrespective of the targeted capabilities, they must contribute to cost-efficient operations and high quality must always be maintained. The efforts to develop capabilities related to innovation and sustainability may be expensive in the short term, however they can provide better cumulative results and competitiveness in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Ascic & Josip Ascic & Per Hilletofth & Márcio Lopes Pimenta & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2022. "An Evaluation of Critical Capabilities and Improvement Areas for Competitive Manufacturing in a Developed-Country Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6678-:d:827685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Tempelmayr & Doris Ehrlinger & Christian Stadlmann & Margarethe Uberwimmer & Stefan Mang & Anna Biedersberger, 2019. "The Performance Effect of Dynamic Capabilities in Servitizing Companies," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(6), pages 42-48, September.
    2. Majed Alsmadi & Zulfiqar Khan & Anne-Marie McTavish, 2011. "Evaluating competitive advantage priorities of SMEs in Jordan," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 25-43.
    3. Battistella, Cinzia & De Toni, Alberto F. & De Zan, Giovanni & Pessot, Elena, 2017. "Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities: A multiple case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-82.
    4. Ting Chi & Peter P.D. Kilduff & Vidyaranya B. Gargeya, 2009. "Alignment between business environment characteristics, competitive priorities, supply chain structures, and firm business performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 58(7), pages 645-669, September.
    5. Bortolotti, Thomas & Danese, Pamela & Flynn, Barbara B. & Romano, Pietro, 2015. "Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 227-241.
    6. da Silveira, Giovani J. C., 2005. "Improving trade-offs in manufacturing: Method and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 27-38, January.
    7. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    8. Sarkar, Soumodip & Pansera, Mario, 2017. "Sustainability-driven innovation at the bottom: Insights from grassroots ecopreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 327-338.
    9. Ofoegbu Wilson Chukwuemeka & B. C. Onuoha, 2018. "Dynamic Capabilities and Competitive Advantage of Fast Foods Restaurants," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(3), pages 7-14, March.
    10. Childerhouse, Paul & Towill, Denis R., 2003. "Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 17-27, February.
    11. Theo Notteboom & Thanos Pallis & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2021. "Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(2), pages 179-210, June.
    12. Clayton M. Christensen & Rory McDonald & Elizabeth J. Altman & Jonathan E. Palmer, 2018. "Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1043-1078, November.
    13. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    14. Roberto Pinheiro & Meifeng Yang, 2018. "The Evolution of the Labor Share across Developed Countries," Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, issue August.
    15. Gylling, Michael & Heikkilä, Jussi & Jussila, Kari & Saarinen, Markku, 2015. "Making decisions on offshore outsourcing and backshoring: A case study in the bicycle industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 92-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2006. "Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 113-124, November.
    2. Miltenburg, John, 2008. "Setting manufacturing strategy for a factory-within-a-factory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 307-323, May.
    3. Cai, Shaohan & Yang, Zhilin, 2014. "On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: The role of performance frontiers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 131-145.
    4. Di Mauro, Carmela & Ancarani, Alessandro, 2022. "A taxonomy of back-shoring initiatives in the US," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    5. Fang, Da & Guo, Yan, 2022. "Flow of goods to the shock of COVID-19 and toll-free highway policy: Evidence from logistics data in China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Alison Ashby, 2016. "From global to local: reshoring for sustainability," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 75-88, December.
    9. Yao He & Yongchun Yang & Meimei Wang & Xudong Zhang, 2022. "Resilience Analysis of Container Port Shipping Network Structure: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    11. Corsini, Lucia & Aranda-Jan, Clara B. & Moultrie, James, 2019. "Using digital fabrication tools to provide humanitarian and development aid in low-resource settings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Rebolledo, Claudia & Jobin, Marie-Hélène, 2013. "Manufacturing and supply alignment: Are different manufacturing strategies linked to different purchasing practices?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 219-226.
    13. Demeter, Krisztina & Szász, Levente, 2013. "Towards solution based thinking: characteristics of servitization at Hungarian manufacturing companies," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 18(3), pages 309-335.
    14. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    15. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    16. Lutz Kilian & Nikos Nomikos & Xiaoqing Zhou, 2023. "Container Trade and the U.S. Recovery," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 19(1), pages 417-450, March.
    17. Martínez Mora, Carmen & Merino De Lucas, Fernando, 2017. "La estrategia de retorno de la industria española: El caso del sector calzado en Alicante, su importancia y determinantes/Reshoring the Spanish Production of Footwear: Its Importance and Determinants," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 35, pages 777-800, Agosto.
    18. Theo Notteboom & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2023. "Maritime container terminal infrastructure, network corporatization, and global terminal operators: Implications for international business policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 67-83, March.
    19. Alev Ozer Torgaloz & Mehmet Fatih Acar & Cemil Kuzey, 2023. "The effects of organizational learning culture and decentralization upon supply chain collaboration: analysis of covid-19 period," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 511-530, March.
    20. Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas & Aleksandr Ostapenko, 2016. "Return, reliability and risk as a proactive set of concepts in developing an efficient integration strategy of companies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-214, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6678-:d:827685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.