IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v4y2009i1p1030-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Enterprise Information System And Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Radut

    (Universitatea Constantin Brancoveanu – Pitești, Facultatea Management Marketing in Afaceri Economice Rm. Valcea)

Abstract

The yield of enterprise can be accretion by integrating systems to business partners to create highest competitive advantage in the time of run. System integration can be done by adopting the e-commerce technology and Business-to-Business models that will

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Radut, 2009. "The Enterprise Information System And Risk Management," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1030-1034, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:1030-1034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://steconomice.uoradea.ro/anale/volume/2009/v4-management-and-marketing/211.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Themistocleous, Marinos & Irani, Zahir & Love, Peter E. D., 2004. "Evaluating the integration of supply chain information systems: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 393-405, December.
    2. Evgeniou, Theodoros, 2002. "Information Integration and Information Strategies for Adaptive Enterprises," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 486-494, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durugbo, Christopher & Tiwari, Ashutosh & Alcock, Jeffrey R., 2013. "Modelling information flow for organisations: A review of approaches and future challenges," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 597-610.
    2. Aderemi Olalere Adebayo & Wasiu Adebayo Lamidi, 2021. "Accounting And Information Technology Alignment: The Influence On Organisational Performance," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 36-48, March.
    3. Enrique Mu & Howard Stern, 2018. "A Contingent/Assimilation Framework for Public Interorganizational Systems Decisions: Should the City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Consolidate Information Technology Services?," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1611-1658, November.
    4. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    5. Khalid Al-Shuaibi, 2016. "Reaping the Benefits of Long Term Relationship with Suppliers: An Evidence from the Saudi Chemical Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 203-203, July.
    6. Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Hackney, Ray & Ali, Maged, 2013. "Facilitating enterprise application integration adoption: An empirical analysis of UK local government authorities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 61-75.
    7. Lechaptois, Lucie, 2020. "Framing supply chain visibility through a multi-field approach," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management: How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Lo, volume 29, pages 487-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Sharif, Amir M. & Irani, Zahir, 2006. "Exploring Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for IS Evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1175-1187, September.
    9. Xiaojun Wang & Xu Chen & Christopher Durugbo & Ziming Cai, 2020. "Manage risk of sustainable product–service systems: a case-based operations research approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 897-920, August.
    10. Rajesh Sethi & Somendra Pant & Anju Sethi, 2017. "Integrating Business-To-Business Customers In Original Equipment Manufacturers’ Supply Chains Through Information Systems Integration," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 22(2), pages 125-162.
    11. Kans, Mirka & Ingwald, Anders, 2008. "Common database for cost-effective improvement of maintenance performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 734-747, June.
    12. Arshinder & Kanda, Arun & Deshmukh, S.G., 2008. "Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 316-335, October.
    13. Su, Yi-fen & Yang, Chyan, 2010. "Why are enterprise resource planning systems indispensable to supply chain management?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 81-94, May.
    14. Agnieszka Jagoda & Tomasz Kolakowski & Jakub Marcinkowski, 2020. "Project Teams as a Supply Chain Integration Tool," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 1160-1177.
    15. Choi, Tsan Ming & Chow, Pui Sze & Liu, Shuk Ching, 2013. "Implementation of fashion ERP systems in China: Case study of a fashion brand, review and future challenges," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 70-81.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enterprise; System; Integration; Business; Risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G39 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Other
    • M29 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:1030-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.