IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2016i1p447-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence Of Education On The Entrepreneurial Behaviour In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Avram

    (Universitatea Tehnica Cluj Napoca UTCN- Centrul Universitar Nord Baia Mare)

  • Simona Sabou

    (UTCN- Centrul Universitar Nord Baia Mare)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the existence of a correlation between education and the difficulties the Romanian entrepreneur faces. In order to reach this objective we studied specialized literature, which tried to define the entrepreneur, to identify his/her characteristics, behaviour, education, its importance and the link between the entrepreneur and the level of education. In the case study elaborated within this paper we analyzed quantitative variables, expressed as percentages, which describe the entrepreneur’s level of education and the difficulties he/she faces in relation to obtaining contracts and to supply and demand. The data used are annual; they refer to a period of time between 1995 and 2013 and were collected by the Romanian National Institute for Statistics. We used as analysis instruments both Microsoft Excel 2010 and the SPSS 17 statistics programme (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). We elaborated statistical tests which would confirm or contradict the existence of certain tighter or weaker links between the entrepreneur’s education and the difficulties he/she faces. The results have proven the existence of strong positive correlations between the entrepreneurs who face supply and demand difficulties and the primary, secondary and vocational levels of education. In other words, as the number of entrepreneurs with the above-mentioned levels of education increases, so does the number of entrepreneurs who face supply and demand-related difficulties. Things change when the number of entrepreneurs with high school and university education increases because the number of entrepreneurs who face supply and demand-related difficulties decreases. Limited access to credit, lack of technology and raw materials are not correlated with the entrepreneur’s level of education. Moreover, the increase in education level increases the probability that the entrepreneur face difficulties related to the low market price, the fact that the company is not well-known and lack of marketing skills. This research his useful both from a theoretical viewpoint, and from a practical one, offering an answer with regard to the correlation between education and the difficulties the Romanian entrepreneur faces.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Avram & Simona Sabou, 2016. "The Influence Of Education On The Entrepreneurial Behaviour In Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 447-456, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:447-456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2016/n1/44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thurik, A.R. & Wennekers, A.R.M., 2001. "A Note on Entrepreneurship, Small Business and Economic Growth," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-60-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. repec:cmj:journl:y:2013:i:27:zimala is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Donald F. Kuratko, 2005. "The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(5), pages 577-597, September.
    4. Corina Rădulescu & Rita Toader & Gratiela Boca & Madela Abrudan & Cristian Anghel & Diana Cezara Toader, 2015. "Sustainable Development in Maramures County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Begley, Thomas M. & Boyd, David P., 1987. "Psychological characteristics associated with performence in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 79-93.
    6. Izabela Luiza Pop & Anca Borza, 2016. "Factors Influencing Museum Sustainability and Indicators for Museum Sustainability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Liliana Adela ZIMA, 2013. "Brand Management At General Motor’S Europe," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 236-244, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian - Liviu Vele, 2017. "An Insight On How Organizations Support Employee Efficiency," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 415-422, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Avram-Pop & Simona Sabou & Stelian Brad, 2017. "The Influence Of Demographic Aspects Upon Business Ethics In Romanian Individuals," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 23-31, December.
    2. Elena-Loreni Baciu & Delia Vîrgă & Theofild-Andrei Lazăr & Delia Gligor & Cecilia-Nicoleta Jurcuț, 2020. "The Association between Entrepreneurial Perceived Behavioral Control, Personality, Empathy, and Assertiveness in a Romanian Sample of Nascent Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Celestine Katongole & John C. Munene & Muhammed Ngoma & Samuel Dawa & Arthur Sserwanga, 2015. "Entrepreneur’s Intrapersonal Resources and Enterprise Success among Micro and Small Scale Women Entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 405-447, December.
    4. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    5. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    6. Muhammad Shahid Qureshi & Saadat Saeed & Syed Waleed Mehmood Wasti, 2016. "The impact of various entrepreneurial interventions during the business plan competition on the entrepreneur identity aspirations of participants," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    8. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    9. Manpreet Rajpal & Bindu Singh, 2024. "How to drive sustainable entrepreneurial intentions: Unraveling the nexus of entrepreneurship education ecosystem, attitude and orientation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1705-1721, May.
    10. Sirje Ustav, 2016. "How Entrepreneurship Education Can be Developed Knowing the Power of Metacognition," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 8(2).
    11. Magnus Hoppe, 2016. "Policy and entrepreneurship education," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 13-29, January.
    12. Charis Avlonitou & Eirini Papadaki & Androniki Kavoura, 2025. "Green Digital Strategies: Sustainability in Global and Greek Cultural Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-44, February.
    13. Michael Stuetzer & Martin Obschonka & Eva Schmitt-Rodermund, 2013. "Balanced skills among nascent entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 93-114, June.
    14. Danny Miller & Cyrille Sardais, 2015. "Bifurcating Time: How Entrepreneurs Reconcile the Paradoxical Demands of the Job," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(3), pages 489-512, May.
    15. Honig, Benson & Samuelsson, Mikael, 2014. "Data replication and extension: A study of business planning and venture-level performance," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 1, pages 18-25.
    16. Georgeta Florina Bat (Iorga), 2018. "Introductory Elements On Entrepreneurship," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 13-20, December.
    17. Coduras, Alicia & Saiz-Alvarez, José Manuel & Ruiz, Jesús, 2016. "Measuring Readiness for Entrepreneurship: An Information Tool Proposal," MPRA Paper 86603, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Soad Abokhamis Mousavi & Ercan Hoşkara & Kyle M. Woosnam, 2017. "Developing a Model for Sustainable Hotels in Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton–Miller, 2011. "Governance, Social Identity, and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Closely Held Public Companies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 1051-1076, September.
    20. Yami, Saïd & M'Chirgui, Zouhaier & Spano, Claude & Gontier Barykina, Olga, 2021. "Reinventing science and technology entrepreneurship education: The role of human and social capitals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneur; education; Romania; demand; supply;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:447-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.