IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i2p97-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Engagement Between Managerial Action And Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Gazzola Patrizia

    (Dipartments of Economics, Insubria University of Varese)

  • Colombo Gianluca

    (Institute of Management,, University of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland)

Abstract

This paper is aimed at designing a research programme to improve the communication with the stakeholder through the analysis of the managerial actions in order to create shared value. At the core of this research we propose to observe the relationships between management actions and the strategic conversations. Thus the dialogue and the communication become the key tool for strategic change. Two fields of analysis are proposed: the dialogue between stakeholders and among the scholars of share value creating. Our hypothesis is that enterprises are formed and changed through sequences of thoughts and actions, in which the medium is always conversational. Thus dialogue becomes the privileged method of intervention in strategic change. This dialogue is always constructive because it proceeds through positive feedbacks and feed-forwards. A dialogue is aimed at including the stakeholders and their arguments, in a relationship oriented to the mutual understanding.. A good relationship with potential customers, NGOs, citizens, governments and other stakeholder is not some vague objective thatâ€(tm)s good to achieve, if possible. It is a determinant key of competitiveness. But it is necessary to recognize that traditional Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) fails the challenge by separating stakeholder engagement from business. In this way shared value creating becomes part of the culture of the company and as such it is fully integrated into strategy, thus finding its natural place in the value chain. The creation of long-term value is only possible through the implementation of a strategy to develop economic and social conditions simultaneously. For a company it is a strategic decision to fund the creation of value that binds to improving the quality of life of employees and the communities in which it operates. In the first part of the paper we introduce some basic concepts, the terminology and the model of the relationships between managerial actions, communication processes and stakeholder engagement. In the second part of the paper, to better understand the link between stakeholder engagement and shared value creating we consider one company that has distinguished itself, one time for scandals, now for shared value creating: NestlÃ(c). The paper shows how implementing a shared value approach is an opportunity not only to contribute to good works, but also to redefine core business strategies, simultaneously creating value for society and for shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Gazzola Patrizia & Colombo Gianluca, 2013. "Stakeholder Engagement Between Managerial Action And Communication," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 97-105, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:97-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n2/009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. gazzola patrizia, 2012. "Social Performance Enhances Financial Performance. Benefits From Csr," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 112-121, July.
    2. Gazzola Patrizia & Meo Colombo Carlotta, 2011. "The Role Of The Sustainability Report In Capitalistic Firm," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 243-250, December.
    3. Paul C. Godfrey & Nile W. Hatch, 2007. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 87-98, January.
    4. Nicolae Cornel Jucan & Sabina Mihaela Jucan, 2010. "Dimensions And Challenges Of Social Responsibility," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(12), pages 1-23.
    5. Seabright, Mark A. & Kurke, Lance B., 1997. "Organizational Ontology and The Moral Status of the Corporation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 91-108, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piero MELLA & Patrizia GAZZOLA, 2015. "Capitalistic Firms as Cognitive Intelligent and Explorative Agents. The Beer’s VSM and Mella’s Moest Views," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 645-674, December.
    2. Patrizia GAZZOLA & Massimo RATTI & Stefano AMELIO, 2017. "CSR and Sustainability Report for Nonprofit Organizations. An Italian Best Practice," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 355-376, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaomin Yu, 2008. "Impacts of Corporate Code of Conduct on Labor Standards: A Case Study of Reebok’s Athletic Footwear Supplier Factory in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 513-529, September.
    2. Irina – Eugenia IAMANDI & Andreea Raluca CARAGIN, & Alina CHICIUDEAN & Mihaela Cristina DRAGOI, 2007. "Corporate Social Responsibility – Analysing Social and Financial Performance The Case of Romania," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 19-30.
    3. O'Higgins, Eleanor & Thevissen, Thibault, 2017. "Revisiting the corporate social and financial performance link: a contingency approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84657, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Cycyota, Cynthia S. & Ferrante, Claudia J. & Schroeder, Jessica M., 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and employee volunteerism: What do the best companies do?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 321-329.
    5. Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money & Stephen Pavelin, 2012. "Stakeholder-Defined Corporate Responsibility for a Pre-Credit-Crunch Financial Service Company: Lessons for How Good Reputations are Won and Lost," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 337-356, February.
    6. Figueira, Sandra & Gauthier, Caroline & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "CSR and stakeholder salience in MNE subsidiaries in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    7. Marcinkowska Elzbieta & Sawicka Joanna, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Consumers in Central and Eastern Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 281-299.
    8. Nazim Hussain, 2015. "Impact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Global Fortune (N100) Firms," Working Papers 1, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    9. Sintayehu Tilaye, 2019. "The Current Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia," International Journal of Social Work, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 45-68, December.
    10. Dina M. Abdelzaher & Amir Abdelzaher, 2017. "Beyond Environmental Regulations: Exploring the Potential of “Eco-Islam” in Boosting Environmental Ethics Within SMEs in Arab Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 357-371, October.
    11. Qaiser Rafique Yasser & Abdullah Al Mamun & Irfan Ahmed, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 210-221, May.
    12. Adam Lindgreen & Valérie Swaen & François Maon, 2009. "Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 251-256, April.
    13. Ataur Belal & Robin Roberts, 2010. "Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 311-324, December.
    14. Kevin Gibson, 2011. "Toward an Intermediate Position on Corporate Moral Personhood," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 71-81, March.
    15. Nazari, Mohsen, 2022. "The journey from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Innovation: The Whys and the Hows," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(2), pages 27-39.
    16. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Brooks, Robert & Do, Hung Xuan, 2023. "ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Patsy Perry & Steve Wood & John Fernie, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Garment Sourcing Networks: Factory Management Perspectives on Ethical Trade in Sri Lanka," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 737-752, September.
    18. Inoue, Yuhei & Lee, Seoki, 2011. "Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 790-804.
    19. Fernando, Mario & Almeida, Shamika, 2012. "The organizational virtuousness of strategic corporate social responsibility: A case study of the Sri Lankan family-owned enterprise MAS Holdings," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 564-576.
    20. Eric Guthey & Mette Morsing, 2014. "CSR and the Mediated Emergence of Strategic Ambiguity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 555-569, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    creation of value; stakeholder engagement:; communication; strategy; CSR; managerial actions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:97-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.