IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/social/y2019i5p22-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility: analysis of theories and models

Author

Listed:
  • Brin, Pavlo

    (National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”)

  • Nehme, Mohamad Nassif

    (National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”)

Abstract

Various definitions, forms, and theories related to Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) are presented in this article. Nowadays most corporations follow different methodologies to implement CSR approach. But in most cases corporation follow CSR methodology that reflects only its shareholders’ interest neglecting its community interest. Critical analysis and comparison for the main CSR theories are presented also, followed by a conclusion about a comprehensive form of CSR that targets both shareholders and community interest. Three of the main CSR theories and models have been represented and analyzed in this article: The Carroll Theory, The Triple Bottom Line Theory, and The Stakeholder Theories. Since any business corporation has to adopt one of these theories, this study reveals the strength and challenges of every theory. There is no doubt that every theory has been well analyzed by its founder or scholar, but an advanced understanding for every theory will make it possible for a corporation’s managers and decision makers to implement long term social and environmental strategies with more accurate achievements. This article is divided into four main sections, the first section presents Carroll’s model for CSR, followed by the second, which is about the Triple Bottom Line theory for CSR, and the third represents the Stakeholder theory. The fourth section analyzes three CSR theories and sheds light on the core responsibility of every theory. Comprehensive analysis for the three recognized CSR models was represented in a table to help readers to locate and clarify systemic differences and common features between the three theories. The last section of the article reveals three main outcomes, the first outcome represents a recommendation for the implementation process of adopting any of the three theories, and which is divided into an internal and external level. The second outcome reveals the importance of addressing a specialized committee for CSR by a company, followed by the third outcome that discusses some of the implications of this analysis for future CSR research and studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Brin, Pavlo & Nehme, Mohamad Nassif, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility: analysis of theories and models," EUREKA: Social and Humanities, Scientific Route OÜ, issue 5, pages 22-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:social:y:2019:i:5:p:22-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eu-jr.eu/social/article/viewFile/1007/993.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhardwaj, Pradeep & Chatterjee, Prabirendra & Demir, Kivilcim Dogerlioglu & Turut, Ozge, 2018. "When and how is corporate social responsibility profitable?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 206-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariana Dubravská & Martina Marchevská & Petra Vašaničová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Linkage: An Empirical Analysis of the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Abhilasha Singh & Apurva Shaurya, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on HR practices in the UAE," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Hajara Dibal Yakadi, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on The Profitability of Nigerian Banks," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(7), pages 853-870, July.
    4. Agata Pierscieniak & Izabela Krawczyk-Sokolowska & Wieslawa Caputa, 2023. "Micro-foundations of environmental entrepreneurship resistance in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 71-95, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lasse Torkkeli & Susanne Durst, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility of SMEs: Learning Orientation and Performance Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Marian Socoliuc & Cristina-Gabriela Cosmulese & Marius-Sorin Ciubotariu & Svetlana Mihaila & Iulia-Diana Arion & Veronica Grosu, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting as a Mixture of CSR and Sustainable Development. A Model for Micro-Enterprises within the Romanian Forestry Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-34, January.
    3. Beata Zatwarnicka-Madura & Dariusz Siemieniako & Ewa Glińska & Yauheniya Sazonenka, 2019. "Strategic and Operational Levels of CSR Marketing Communication for Sustainable Orientation of a Company: A Case Study from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Iskandar Zainuddin Rela & Abd Hair Awang & Zaimah Ramli & Sarmila Md Sum & Meisanti Meisanti, 2020. "Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental well‐being perception and the mediation role of community resilience," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2176-2187, September.
    5. Patro, Sukesh & Zhang, Lu Y. & Zhao, Rong, 2018. "Director tenure and corporate social responsibility: The tradeoff between experience and independence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 51-66.
    6. Lee, Ruby P. & Wei, Susan, 2023. "Do employee orientation and societal orientation matter in the customer orientation—Performance link?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Mohamad Hassan Shahrour & Isabelle Girerd-Potin & Ollivier Taramasco, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and firm default risk in the Eurozone: a market-based approach," Post-Print hal-03198467, HAL.
    8. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Chih-Hai Yang, 2022. "Corporate philanthropy and employee wellbeing: do types of corporate philanthropy matter?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 803-828, December.
    10. Saridakis, Charalampos & Angelidou, Sofia & Woodside, Arch G., 2023. "How historical and social aspirations reshape the relationship between corporate financial performance and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Naeeni, Hannan Sadjady & Sahin, Funda & Powell Robinson, E., 2023. "Socially responsible product-positioning: Impact of halo/horns spillover on product image," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 852-863.
    12. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2020. "Social Responsibility in a Bilateral Monopoly with Downstream Convex Technology," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 761-776, December.
    13. Adams, Dawda & Adams, Kweku & Ullah, Subhan & Ullah, Farid, 2019. "Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socio-economic growth of oil-rich developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 128-140.
    14. He, Chaohua & Li, Yun, 2024. "Targeted poverty alleviation and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Ruitao Li & Fang Hu, 2020. "Public Listing and Corporate Social Responsibility from a Sustainability Risk Management Perspective," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 808-808, August.
    16. Adams, Dawda & Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Ullah, Subhan & Rodgers, Waymond & Kimani, Danson, 2022. "Social and environmental practices and corporate financial performance of multinational corporations in emerging markets: Evidence from 20 oil-rich African countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Khizar Hayat & Zhu Jianjun & Hashim Zameer & Shahid Iqbal, 2020. "Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility practices on impulse buying," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1454-1464, May.
    18. Chen, Wanyu (Tina) & Zhou, Gaoguang (Stephen) & Zhu, Xindong (Kevin), 2019. "CEO tenure and corporate social responsibility performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 292-302.
    19. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Azmi, Wajahat & Hassan, M. Kabir & Houston, Reza & Karim, Mohammad Sydul, 2021. "ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:social:y:2019:i:5:p:22-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helen Klimashevska (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://eu-jr.eu/social .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.