IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/gtwdoq/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The forming of scenarios of enterprise development on the basis of four-level indicator of sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Katkova Natalia

    (Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Mykolaiv)

  • Murashko Irina

    (Danube Branch of Interregional Human Resource Management Academy, Izmail)

Abstract

The object of research is a methodical approach to the scenarios of sustainable development of an enterprise based on the choice of a four-level indicator of sustainable development. One of the most problematic issues is the application of such a methodical approach to determining the level of sustainable development, which would allow the formation of relevant scenarios in interaction with the external environment. For the development of a complex indicator that would take into account the mutual influence of the enterprise and its ecosystem, the study applied a bionomic approach, that is, an approach inherent in the study of biological systems. As a basis for assessing the level of sustainable development of the enterprise, an indicator of ecological capacity is used. It characterizes the limiting loading of a biological species to a habitat or the maximum size of a population of a species that the environment can certainly sustain, provide food, shelter, water, and other necessary benefits. The methodical approach to the formation of scenarios for the enterprise development is improved by developing a four-level indicator of sustainable development, which provides opportunities to determine the ability of certain subsystems of the enterprise to develop, taking into account the availability of internal and external resources. The developed indicator consists of indicators of economic, environmental, social and energy capacity, the characteristics of which are given in the work. Based on the value of the indicator, the proposed scenarios for the sustainable development of an enterprise are a combination of subsystems for which resources are exhausted and which have a supply of resources. To ensure a balanced development of an enterprise, it is possible to redistribute resources between subsystems, for which appropriate measures are determined using the above sustainable development scenarios. In addition, thanks to the developed methodology, it is possible to determine the directions of harmonious coexistence of an enterprise with the external environment, which is the main principle of sustainable development. In comparison with the known approaches, the proposed four-level indicator of sustainable development, as well as scenarios based on it, takes into account the peculiarities of the existence of the enterprise in its ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Katkova Natalia & Murashko Irina, 2019. "The forming of scenarios of enterprise development on the basis of four-level indicator of sustainable development," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(46) 2019, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(46)), pages 4-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:gtwdoq:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/165707
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Hellmeister & Harold Richins, 2019. "Green to Gold: Beneficial Impacts of Sustainability Certification and Practice on Tour Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Carmen Lenuta Trica & Cristian Silviu Banacu & Mihail Busu, 2019. "Environmental Factors and Sustainability of the Circular Economy Model at the European Union Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Tajammal Hussain & Rick Edgeman & Jacob Eskildsen & Alaa Mohamed Shoukry & Showkat Gani, 2018. "Sustainable Enterprise Excellence: Attribute-Based Assessment Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Alžbeta Kucharčíková & Martin Mičiak & Miloš Hitka, 2018. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investment in Human Capital in E-Business Enterprise in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Sebastian Stan & Vasile Brătian, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability and Intangible Resources Binomial: New Proposal on Intangible Resources Recognition and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    3. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    4. Emese Tokarcikova & Eva Malichova & Alzbeta Kucharcíkova & Maria Durisova, 2020. "Importance of Technical and Business Skills for Future IT Professionals," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(54), pages 567-567, April.
    5. Vitor Pereira & Graça Miranda Silva & Álvaro Dias, 2021. "Sustainability Practices in Hospitality: Case Study of a Luxury Hotel in Arrábida Natural Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Juhani Ukko & Minna Saunila & Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala, 2022. "The importance of sustainability engagement in small businesses supplier collaboration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 1-9, February.
    7. Lin-Lin Xue & Ching-Cheng Shen & Chun-Nan Lin & Kun-Lin Hsieh, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Business Model Innovation Employed by Small and Micro Travel Agencies in the Internet+ Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Patricia Janosova, 2021. "Sustainable activities in manufacturing enterprises: Consumers’ expectations," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 91-101, March.
    9. Gonca Yılmaz, 2023. "Which Factors Drive The Resource Efficiency in Circular Economy? A Panel Data Regression Analysis," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(38), pages 19-34, June.
    10. Ágnes Bárkányi & Attila Egedy & Attila Sarkady & Róbert Kurdi & János Abonyi, 2022. "Expert-Based Modular Simulator for Municipal Waste Processing Technology Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Gheorghița Dincă & Ana-Angela Milan & Maria Letiția Andronic & Anna-Maria Pasztori & Dragoș Dincă, 2022. "Does Circular Economy Contribute to Smart Cities’ Sustainable Development?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Codruța Cornelia Dura & Ana Maria Mihaela Iordache & Alexandru Ionescu & Claudia Isac & Teodora Odett Breaz, 2022. "Analyzing Performance in Wholesale Trade Romanian SMEs: Framing Circular Economy Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-34, May.
    13. Renuka Nagpal & Daksh Rana & Nuaim Bashir Mir & Aditya Dwivedi & Deepti Mehrotra, 2024. "Predicting the future trends for circular economy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(10), pages 4905-4922, October.
    14. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Aleksandar Šević & Milena P. Ilić & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Nevenka Popović Šević & Larisa Mihoreanu, 2021. "Untapped Aspects of Innovation and Competition within a European Resilient Circular Economy. A Dual Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Tokarčíková Emese, 2019. "The Aspects of Age Management Towards Sustainable and Responsible Business," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 27(s1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. Lawrence Arokiasamy & Takemi Fujikawa & Shishi Kumar Piaralal & Thilageswary Arumugam, 2023. "A systematic review of literature on Human capital investment and its significance for human resource development," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1810-1826, October.
    17. Wooseung Lee & Boyoung Kim, 2019. "Business Sustainability of Start-Ups Based on Government Support: An Empirical Study of Korean Start-Ups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Aurelija Burinskienė & Olga Lingaitienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2022. "Core Elements Affecting the Circularity of Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja & Naqeeb Ur Rehman & Rafael Laurenti, 2020. "Circular Economy Innovation and Environmental Sustainability Impact on Economic Growth: An Integrated Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Zuzana Stofkova & Viera Sukalova, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Human Resources in Globalization Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    enterprise sustainable development level; enterprise sustainable development scenarios;

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:gtwdoq:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.