IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2019-4-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tarifbindung und betriebliche Interessenvertretung: Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Ellguth, Peter
  • Kohaut, Susanne

Abstract

This article continues the annual reporting of the IAB in WSI-Mitteilungen on collective bargaining and company level representation of interests with data for 2018. First, the commitment of the companies to collective bargaining agreements is presented by sector, company size and federal state. Thereby the still persisting differences between west and east Germany are taken into account. Since 1996, collective bargaining coverage in both parts of the country has shown a clear downward trend, even though the recent development has been less clear. These results are complemented by information on works councils and alternative forms of company employee representation. In the long run a distinct downward movement is also apparent for works council coverage. However, in 2018 this trend seems to have been broken. The various forms of employee representation not legitimised by law are characterised primarily by their low stability. Finally, the joint examination of both levels of interest representation points to the extensive gaps of co-determination on the shop floor (betriebliche Vertretungslücken) and also completely blank spots with no collective agreement at all.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellguth, Peter & Kohaut, Susanne, 2019. "Tarifbindung und betriebliche Interessenvertretung: Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2018," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 72(4), pages 290-297.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2019-4-290
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2019-4-290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2019-4-290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2019-4-290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kovalenko, Tim, 2021. "Uncertainty shocks and employment fluctuations in Germany: The role of establishment size," Discussion Papers 119, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    2. Boris Hirsch & Philipp Lentge & Claus Schnabel, 2022. "Uncovered workers in plants covered by collective bargaining: Who are they and how do they fare?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 929-945, December.
    3. Moritz Drechsel‐Grau & Andreas Peichl & Kai D. Schmid & Johannes F. Schmieder & Hannes Walz & Stefanie Wolter, 2022. "Inequality and income dynamics in Germany," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(4), pages 1593-1635, November.
    4. Laszlo Goerke & Markus Pannenberg, 2024. "Wage determination in the shadow of the law: The case of works councilors in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(1), pages 83-115, February.
    5. Simon Jäger & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2021. "Natürliche Experimente im Arbeitsmarkt und darüber hinaus [Natural Experiments in Labor Economics and Beyond]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(12), pages 977-983, December.
    6. Simon Jäger & Shakked Noy & Benjamin Schoefer, 2022. "The German Model of Industrial Relations: Balancing Flexibility and Collective Action," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 53-80, Fall.
    7. Dütsch, Matthias, 2022. "COVID-19 and the labour market: What are the working conditions in critical jobs?," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 56, pages 1-10.
    8. Susan Corby & Ryuichi Yamakawa, 2020. "Judicial regimes for employment rights disputes: comparing Germany, Great Britain and Japan," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 374-390, September.
    9. Arnd Kölling, 2022. "Shortage of Skilled Labor, Unions and the Wage Premium: A Regression Analysis with Establishment Panel Data for Germany," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 239-259, June.
    10. Erol, Serife & Ahlers, Elke & Schleicher, Sergej, 2021. "Betriebliche Weiterbildung als Handlungsfeld der Betriebsräte," WSI Policy Briefs 51, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    11. Matthias Dütsch, 2022. "COVID-19 and the labour market: What are the working conditions in critical jobs?," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Hagen Lesch, 2020. "100 Jahre Betriebsrätegesetz und aktuelle Partizipation von Beschäftigten in Deutschland [100 Years of the Works Council Act and Current Participation of Employees in Germany]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(7), pages 550-555, July.
    13. Tim Kovalenko, 2021. "Uncertainty shocks and employment fluctuations in Germany: the role of establishment size," Working Papers 212, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    14. Kerstin Rego, 2022. "Works councils and the digitalisation of manufacturing: Opportunity or threat for their power position?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1911-1933, November.
    15. Toralf Pusch & Hartmut Seifert, 2021. "Stabilisierende Wirkungen durch Kurzarbeit [Stabilising Effects of Short-Time Work During the Corona Pandemic in Germany]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 99-105, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2019-4-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.