IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i2d10.1038_s41562-023-01749-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable

Author

Listed:
  • John Protzko

    (University of California, Santa Barbara
    Central Connecticut State University)

  • Jon Krosnick

    (Stanford University)

  • Leif Nelson

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Brian A. Nosek

    (Center for Open Science
    University of Virginia)

  • Jordan Axt

    (McGill University)

  • Matt Berent

    (Matt Berent Consulting)

  • Nicholas Buttrick

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison)

  • Matthew DeBell

    (Stanford University)

  • Charles R. Ebersole

    (University of Virginia)

  • Sebastian Lundmark

    (University of Gothenburg)

  • Bo MacInnis

    (Stanford University)

  • Michael O’Donnell

    (Georgetown University)

  • Hannah Perfecto

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • James E. Pustejovsky

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison)

  • Scott S. Roeder

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Jan Walleczek

    (Phenoscience Laboratories)

  • Jonathan W. Schooler

    (University of California, Santa Barbara)

Abstract

Failures to replicate evidence of new discoveries have forced scientists to ask whether this unreliability is due to suboptimal implementation of methods or whether presumptively optimal methods are not, in fact, optimal. This paper reports an investigation by four coordinated laboratories of the prospective replicability of 16 novel experimental findings using rigour-enhancing practices: confirmatory tests, large sample sizes, preregistration and methodological transparency. In contrast to past systematic replication efforts that reported replication rates averaging 50%, replication attempts here produced the expected effects with significance testing (P

Suggested Citation

  • John Protzko & Jon Krosnick & Leif Nelson & Brian A. Nosek & Jordan Axt & Matt Berent & Nicholas Buttrick & Matthew DeBell & Charles R. Ebersole & Sebastian Lundmark & Bo MacInnis & Michael O’Donnell , 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 311-319, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01749-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01749-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Tipton & James E. Pustejovsky, 2015. "Small-Sample Adjustments for Tests of Moderators and Model Fit Using Robust Variance Estimation in Meta-Regression," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(6), pages 604-634, December.
    2. Eugenie Samuel Reich, 2012. "Timing glitches dog neutrino claim," Nature, Nature, vol. 483(7387), pages 17-17, March.
    3. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    4. Camerer, Colin & Dreber, Anna & Forsell, Eskil & Ho, Teck-Hua & Huber, Jurgen & Johannesson, Magnus & Kirchler, Michael & Almenberg, Johan & Altmejd, Adam & Chan, Taizan & Heikensten, Emma & Holzmeist, 2016. "Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics," MPRA Paper 75461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Konstantopoulos, Spyros, 2011. "Fixed Effects and Variance Components Estimation in Three-Level Meta-Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 5678, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Röseler, Lukas & Kaiser, Leonard & Doetsch, Christopher Albert & Klett, Noah & Seida, Christian & Schütz, Astrid & Aczel, Balazs & Adelina, Nadia & Agostini, Valeria & Alarie, Samuel, 2024. "The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science," MetaArXiv me2ub, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangsuk Yoon & Nathan M. Fong & Angelika Dimoka, 2019. "The robustness of anchoring effects on preferential judgments," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(4), pages 470-487, July.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:4:p:470-487 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Schaerer, Michael & du Plessis, Christilene & Nguyen, My Hoang Bao & van Aert, Robbie C.M. & Tiokhin, Leo & Lakens, Daniël & Giulia Clemente, Elena & Pfeiffer, Thomas & Dreber, Anna & Johannesson, Mag, 2023. "On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Mikkel Helding Vembye & James Eric Pustejovsky & Therese Deocampo Pigott, 2023. "Power Approximations for Overall Average Effects in Meta-Analysis With Dependent Effect Sizes," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(1), pages 70-102, February.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:394-421 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Despoina Alempaki & Emina Canic & Timothy L. Mullett & William J. Skylark & Chris Starmer & Neil Stewart & Fabio Tufano, 2019. "Reexamining How Utility and Weighting Functions Get Their Shapes: A Quasi-Adversarial Collaboration Providing a New Interpretation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4841-4862, October.
    7. Christopher Hansen & Joern Block & Matthias Neuenkirch, 2020. "Family Firm Performance Over The Business Cycle: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 476-511, July.
    8. Jaskiewicz, Peter & Block, Joern & Wagner, Dominik & Carney, Michael & Hansen, Christopher, 2021. "How do cross-country differences in institutional trust and trust in family explain the mixed performance effects of family management? A meta-analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    9. Welz, Thilo & Viechtbauer, Wolfgang & Pauly, Markus, 2023. "Cluster-robust estimators for multivariate mixed-effects meta-regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Pustejovsky, James E & Tipton, Elizabeth, 2020. "Meta-Analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models," MetaArXiv vyfcj, Center for Open Science.
    11. Johannes Knoll & Jörg Matthes, 2017. "The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 55-75, January.
    12. Schubert, Anna-Lena, 2019. "A meta-analysis of the worst performance rule," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-100.
    13. Boris Forthmann & Karin Kaczykowski & Mathias Benedek & Heinz Holling, 2023. "The Manic Idea Creator? A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Bipolar Disorder and Creative Cognitive Potential," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-39, June.
    14. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    15. Cinar, Ozan & Nakagawa, Shinichi & Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2020. "Phylogenetic multilevel meta-analysis: A simulation study on the importance of modeling the phylogeny," EcoEvoRxiv su4zv, Center for Open Science.
    16. Mathur, Maya B & VanderWeele, Tyler, 2018. "Statistical methods for evidence synthesis," Thesis Commons kd6ja, Center for Open Science.
    17. Neda Nasrollahi & Tim Jowett & Liana Machado, 2022. "Emotional information processing in young and older adults: meta-analysis reveals faces elicit distinct biases," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 369-379, September.
    18. Colagrossi, Marco & Rossignoli, Domenico & Maggioni, Mario A., 2020. "Does democracy cause growth? A meta-analysis (of 2000 regressions)," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Lei Zhou & Nan Liu & Ya-Qiong Liao & Ai-Mei Li, 2021. "Risky choice framing with various problem descriptions: A replication and extension study," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 394-421, March.
    20. Thomas Rockstuhl & Robert Eisenberger & Lynn M. Shore & James N. Kurtessis & Michael T. Ford & Louis C. Buffardi & Salar Mesdaghinia, 2020. "Perceived organizational support (POS) across 54 nations: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of POS effects," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(6), pages 933-962, August.
    21. Waheed, Hassam, 2023. "Nudging smokers away from lighting up: A meta-analysis of framing effect in current smokers," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    22. Babin, Barry J. & Herrmann, Jean-Luc & Kacha, Mathieu & Babin, Laurie A., 2021. "The effectiveness of brand placements: A meta-analytic synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1017-1033.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01749-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.