IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i2d10.1038_s41562-023-01737-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometry of visuospatial working memory information in miniature gaze patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Linde-Domingo

    (Max Planck Institute for Human Development
    Max Planck Institute for Human Development
    University of Granada
    University of Granada)

  • Bernhard Spitzer

    (Max Planck Institute for Human Development
    Max Planck Institute for Human Development)

Abstract

Stimulus-dependent eye movements have been recognized as a potential confound in decoding visual working memory information from neural signals. Here we combined eye-tracking with representational geometry analyses to uncover the information in miniature gaze patterns while participants (n = 41) were cued to maintain visual object orientations. Although participants were discouraged from breaking fixation by means of real-time feedback, small gaze shifts (

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Linde-Domingo & Bernhard Spitzer, 2024. "Geometry of visuospatial working memory information in miniature gaze patterns," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 336-348, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01737-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01737-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01737-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-023-01737-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Luck & Edward K. Vogel, 1997. "The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6657), pages 279-281, November.
    2. Chunyue Teng & Dwight J. Kravitz, 2019. "Visual working memory directly alters perception," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 827-836, August.
    3. Stephenie A. Harrison & Frank Tong, 2009. "Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7238), pages 632-635, April.
    4. Ranulfo Romo & Carlos D. Brody & Adrián Hernández & Luis Lemus, 1999. "Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6735), pages 470-473, June.
    5. Baiwei Liu & Anna C. Nobre & Freek van Ede, 2022. "Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Mark W. Schurgin & John T. Wixted & Timothy F. Brady, 2020. "Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1156-1172, November.
    7. Freek van Ede & Sammi R. Chekroud & Anna C. Nobre, 2019. "Human gaze tracks attentional focusing in memorized visual space," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 462-470, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David W Sutterer & Joshua J Foster & Kirsten C S Adam & Edward K Vogel & Edward Awh, 2019. "Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Mohammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu & Giovanni d'Avossa, 2014. "Fine-Grained, Local Maps and Coarse, Global Representations Support Human Spatial Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Yuanqing Li & Guangyi Wang & Jinyi Long & Zhuliang Yu & Biao Huang & Xiaojian Li & Tianyou Yu & Changhong Liang & Zheng Li & Pei Sun, 2011. "Reproducibility and Discriminability of Brain Patterns of Semantic Categories Enhanced by Congruent Audiovisual Stimuli," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Aki Kondo & Jun Saiki, 2012. "Feature-Specific Encoding Flexibility in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Tullo, Domenico & Faubert, Jocelyn & Bertone, Armando, 2018. "The characterization of attention resource capacity and its relationship with fluid reasoning intelligence: A multiple object tracking study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 158-168.
    6. Duncan Edward Astle & Anna Christina Nobre & Gaia Scerif, 2009. "Applying an Attentional Set to Perceived and Remembered Features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Jifan Zhou & Jun Yin & Tong Chen & Xiaowei Ding & Zaifeng Gao & Mowei Shen, 2011. "Visual Working Memory Capacity Does Not Modulate the Feature-Based Information Filtering in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Quirin Gehmacher & Juliane Schubert & Fabian Schmidt & Thomas Hartmann & Patrick Reisinger & Sebastian Rösch & Konrad Schwarz & Tzvetan Popov & Maria Chait & Nathan Weisz, 2024. "Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Li, Qian & Huang, Zhuowei (Joy) & Christianson, Kiel, 2016. "Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: An eye-tracking study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 243-258.
    10. Yuri A. Markov & Igor S. Utochkin, 2017. "The Effect of Object Distinctiveness on Object-Location Binding in Visual Working Memory," HSE Working papers WP BRP 79/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. S. Cerreia-Vioglio & F. Maccheroni & M. Marinacci & A. Rustichini, 2017. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Working Papers 615, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    12. Jordi Fonollosa & Emre Neftci & Mikhail Rabinovich, 2015. "Learning of Chunking Sequences in Cognition and Behavior," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    14. Baiwei Liu & Anna C. Nobre & Freek van Ede, 2022. "Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Ociepka, Michał & Kałamała, Patrycja & Chuderski, Adam, 2022. "High individual alpha frequency brains run fast, but it does not make them smart," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:3:p:254-267 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Shaiyan Keshvari & Ronald van den Berg & Wei Ji Ma, 2013. "No Evidence for an Item Limit in Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    19. Bin Zhu & Stephanie A. Watts, 2010. "Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 327-344, June.
    20. Rock, Rufus & Strauss, Ilan & O'Reilly, Tim & Mazzucato, Mariana, 2024. "Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    21. D. Alexander Varakin & Jamie Hale, 2014. "Intentional Memory Instructions Direct Attention But Do Not Enhance Visual Memory," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01737-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.