IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v66y2018icp44-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strong link between fluid intelligence and working memory cannot be explained away by strategy use

Author

Listed:
  • Jastrzębski, Jan
  • Ciechanowska, Iwona
  • Chuderski, Adam

Abstract

In order to evaluate recent claims that individual differences in strategy use (i.e., using either constructive matching or response elimination to solve a gf problem) can explain away, or at least significantly weaken, the strong relationship between working memory capacity (WMC) and fluid intelligence (gf), in two large-sample studies we applied multiple measures of WMC, gf, and strategy use, and tested if the mediation of strategy use affected the WMC-gf relationship. We observed no significant drop in the WMC-gf link due to mediation, thus refuting the alleged role of strategy use in the involvement of working memory processes in fluid reasoning. Moreover, our results suggest that it is the significant correlation of both strategy use and cognitive style with WMC which is the driving force for their moderate correlation with gf.

Suggested Citation

  • Jastrzębski, Jan & Ciechanowska, Iwona & Chuderski, Adam, 2018. "The strong link between fluid intelligence and working memory cannot be explained away by strategy use," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 44-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:44-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617302775
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Luck & Edward K. Vogel, 1997. "The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6657), pages 279-281, November.
    2. Santarnecchi, Emiliano & Emmendorfer, Alexandra & Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, 2017. "Dissecting the parieto-frontal correlates of fluid intelligence: A comprehensive ALE meta-analysis study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 9-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Chenyu & Ren, Xuezhu & Schweizer, Karl & Wang, Tengfei, 2022. "Strategy use moderates the relation between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: A combined approach," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Forthmann, Boris & Jendryczko, David & Scharfen, Jana & Kleinkorres, Ruben & Benedek, Mathias & Holling, Heinz, 2019. "Creative ideation, broad retrieval ability, and processing speed: A confirmatory study of nested cognitive abilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 59-72.
    3. Liu, Yaohui & Zhan, Peida & Fu, Yanbin & Chen, Qipeng & Man, Kaiwen & Luo, Yikun, 2023. "Using a multi-strategy eye-tracking psychometric model to measure intelligence and identify cognitive strategy in Raven's advanced progressive matrices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Jarosz, Andrew F. & Raden, Megan J. & Wiley, Jennifer, 2019. "Working memory capacity and strategy use on the RAPM," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Raden, Megan J. & Jarosz, Andrew F., 2022. "Strategy Transfer on Fluid Reasoning Tasks," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ociepka, Michał & Kałamała, Patrycja & Chuderski, Adam, 2022. "High individual alpha frequency brains run fast, but it does not make them smart," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Ünal, Zehra E. & Kartal, Gamze & Ulusoy, Serra & Ala, Aslı M. & Yilmaz, Munube & Geary, David C., 2023. "Relative contributions of g and basic domain-specific mathematics skills to complex mathematics competencies," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Aki Kondo & Jun Saiki, 2012. "Feature-Specific Encoding Flexibility in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Tullo, Domenico & Faubert, Jocelyn & Bertone, Armando, 2018. "The characterization of attention resource capacity and its relationship with fluid reasoning intelligence: A multiple object tracking study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 158-168.
    5. Gągol, A. & Magnuski, M. & Kroczek, B. & Kałamała, P. & Ociepka, M. & Santarnecchi, E. & Chuderski, A., 2018. "Delta-gamma coupling as a potential neurophysiological mechanism of fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Jifan Zhou & Jun Yin & Tong Chen & Xiaowei Ding & Zaifeng Gao & Mowei Shen, 2011. "Visual Working Memory Capacity Does Not Modulate the Feature-Based Information Filtering in Visual Working Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    7. Li, Qian & Huang, Zhuowei (Joy) & Christianson, Kiel, 2016. "Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: An eye-tracking study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 243-258.
    8. Yuri A. Markov & Igor S. Utochkin, 2017. "The Effect of Object Distinctiveness on Object-Location Binding in Visual Working Memory," HSE Working papers WP BRP 79/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. S. Cerreia-Vioglio & F. Maccheroni & M. Marinacci & A. Rustichini, 2017. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Working Papers 615, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:3:p:254-267 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Zurrin, Riley & Wong, Samantha Tze Sum & Roes, Meighen M. & Percival, Chantal M. & Chinchani, Abhijit & Arreaza, Leo & Kusi, Mavis & Momeni, Ava & Rasheed, Maiya & Mo, Zhaoyi & Goghari, Vina M. & Wood, 2024. "Functional brain networks involved in the Raven's standard progressive matrices task and their relation to theories of fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Shaiyan Keshvari & Ronald van den Berg & Wei Ji Ma, 2013. "No Evidence for an Item Limit in Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    13. Bin Zhu & Stephanie A. Watts, 2010. "Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 327-344, June.
    14. D. Alexander Varakin & Jamie Hale, 2014. "Intentional Memory Instructions Direct Attention But Do Not Enhance Visual Memory," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
    15. Haggar Cohen-Dallal & Isaac Fradkin & Yoni Pertzov, 2018. "Are stronger memories forgotten more slowly? No evidence that memory strength influences the rate of forgetting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Loic Matthey & Paul M Bays & Peter Dayan, 2015. "A Probabilistic Palimpsest Model of Visual Short-term Memory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, January.
    17. Bruton, Oliver J., 2021. "Is there a “g-neuron”? Establishing a systematic link between general intelligence (g) and the von Economo neuron," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Hilger, Kirsten & Spinath, Frank M. & Troche, Stefan & Schubert, Anna-Lena, 2022. "The biological basis of intelligence: Benchmark findings," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Krieger, Florian & Zimmer, Hubert D. & Greiff, Samuel & Spinath, Frank M. & Becker, Nicolas, 2019. "Why are difficult figural matrices hard to solve? The role of selective encoding and working memory capacity," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 35-48.
    20. Jochen Ranger & Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, 2013. "Analyzing Response Times in Tests With Rank Correlation Approaches," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(1), pages 61-80, February.
    21. Jeanne Hagenbach & Rachel Kranton, 2023. "Competition, Cooperation, and Motivated Social Perceptions," Working Papers hal-03792554, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:44-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.