IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-55843-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and immunogenicity of an optimized self-replicating RNA platform for low dose or single dose vaccine applications: a randomized, open label Phase I study in healthy volunteers

Author

Listed:
  • Christian J. Maine

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Shigeki J. Miyake-Stoner

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Darina S. Spasova

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Gaelle Picarda

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Annie C. Chou

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Emily D. Brand

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Melanie D. Olesiuk

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Christine C. Domingo

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Hunter J. Little

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Thomas T. Goodman

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Jacqueline L. Posy

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Jasmin Gonzalez

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Terrina L. Bayone

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Jessica Sparks

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Ebony N. Gary

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Zhi Xiang

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Nicholas J. Tursi

    (The Wistar Institute
    University of Pennsylvania)

  • Casey E. Hojecki

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Hildegund C. J. Ertl

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • David B. Weiner

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Irafasha C. Casmil

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Anna K. Blakney

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Brandon Essink

    (Velocity Clinical Research)

  • Guillermo Somodevilla

    (Cordova Research Institute)

  • Nathaniel S. Wang

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Andrew J. Geall

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Zelanna Goldberg

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

  • Parinaz Aliahmad

    (Replicate Bioscience Inc)

Abstract

Self-replicating RNA (srRNA) technology, in comparison to mRNA vaccines, has shown dose-sparing by approximately 10-fold and more durable immune responses. However, no improvements are observed in the adverse events profile. Here, we develop an srRNA vaccine platform with optimized non-coding regions and demonstrate immunogenicity and safety in preclinical and clinical development. Optimized srRNA vaccines generate protective immunity (according to the WHO defined thresholds) at doses up to 1,000,000-fold lower than mRNA in female mouse models of influenza and rabies. Clinically, safety and immunogenicity of RBI-4000, an srRNA vector encoding the rabies glycoprotein, was evaluated in a Phase I study (NCT06048770). RBI-4000 was able to elicit de novo protective immunity in the majority of healthy participants when administered at a dose of 0.1, 1, or 10 microgram (71%, 94%, 100%, respectively) in a prime-boost schedule. Similarly, we observe immunity above the WHO benchmark of protection following a single administration in most participants at both 1 and 10 microgram doses. There are no serious adverse events reported across all cohorts. These data establish the high therapeutic index of optimized srRNA vectors, demonstrating feasibility of both low dose and single dose approaches for vaccine applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian J. Maine & Shigeki J. Miyake-Stoner & Darina S. Spasova & Gaelle Picarda & Annie C. Chou & Emily D. Brand & Melanie D. Olesiuk & Christine C. Domingo & Hunter J. Little & Thomas T. Goodman &, 2025. "Safety and immunogenicity of an optimized self-replicating RNA platform for low dose or single dose vaccine applications: a randomized, open label Phase I study in healthy volunteers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-55843-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55843-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-55843-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-55843-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-55843-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.