IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-41701-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon intensity of global crude oil trading and market policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Yash Dixit

    (MIT)

  • Hassan El-Houjeiri

    (Energy Traceability Technology, Technology Strategy and Planning Department, Aramco)

  • Jean-Christophe Monfort

    (Energy Traceability Technology, Technology Strategy and Planning Department, Aramco)

  • Liang Jing

    (University of Calgary
    Climate and Sustainability Group, Aramco Research Center–Detroit, Aramco Americas)

  • Yiqi Zhang

    (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

  • James Littlefield

    (Climate and Sustainability Group, Aramco Research Center–Detroit, Aramco Americas)

  • Wennan Long

    (Stanford University)

  • Christoph Falter

    (MIT)

  • Alhassan Badahdah

    (Energy Traceability Technology, Technology Strategy and Planning Department, Aramco)

  • Joule Bergerson

    (University of Calgary)

  • Raymond L. Speth

    (MIT)

  • Steven R. H. Barrett

    (MIT)

Abstract

The energy mix transition has accelerated the need for more accurate emissions reporting throughout the petroleum supply chain. Despite increasing environmental regulations and pressure for emissions disclosure, the low resolution of existing carbon footprint assessment does not account for the complexity of crude oil trading. The lack of source crude traceability has led to poor visibility into the “well-to-refinery-entrance” carbon intensities at the level of granular pathways between producers and destination markets. Using high-fidelity datasets, optimization algorithms to facilitate supply chain traceability and bottom-up, physics-based emission estimators, we show that the variability in global “well-to-refinery-entrance” carbon intensities at the level of crude trade pathways is significant: 4.2–214.1 kg-CO2-equivalent/barrel with a volume-weighted average of 50.5 kg-CO2-equivalent/barrel. Coupled with oil supply forecasts under 1.5 °C scenarios up to 2050, this variability translates to additional CO2-equivalent savings of 1.5–6.1 Gigatons that could be realized solely by prioritizing low-carbon supply chain pathways without other capital-intensive mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yash Dixit & Hassan El-Houjeiri & Jean-Christophe Monfort & Liang Jing & Yiqi Zhang & James Littlefield & Wennan Long & Christoph Falter & Alhassan Badahdah & Joule Bergerson & Raymond L. Speth & Stev, 2023. "Carbon intensity of global crude oil trading and market policy implications," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41701-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41701-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41701-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-41701-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillaume Chapron, 2017. "The environment needs cryptogovernance," Nature, Nature, vol. 545(7655), pages 403-405, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Rusch & Josef‐Peter Schöggl & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2023. "Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1159-1174, March.
    2. Chunhua Ju & Zhonghua Shen & Fuguang Bao & Pengtong Weng & Yihang Xu & Chonghuan Xu, 2022. "A Novel Credible Carbon Footprint Traceability System for Low Carbon Economy Using Blockchain Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Pavel Ciaian & Andrej Cupak & Pirmin Fessler & d'Artis Kancs, 2022. "Environmental-Social-Governance Preferences and Investments in Crypto-Assets (Pavel Ciaian, Andrej Cupak, Pirmin Fessler, d’Artis Kancs)," Working Papers 243, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    4. Moslem Dehghani & Mohammad Ghiasi & Taher Niknam & Abdollah Kavousi-Fard & Mokhtar Shasadeghi & Noradin Ghadimi & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2020. "Blockchain-Based Securing of Data Exchange in a Power Transmission System Considering Congestion Management and Social Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Tsolakis, Naoum & Niedenzu, Denis & Simonetto, Melissa & Dora, Manoj & Kumar, Mukesh, 2021. "Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 495-519.
    6. George Blumberg & Maurizio Sibilla, 2023. "A Carbon Accounting and Trading Platform for the uk Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Oluwaseun Fadeyi & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Kamil Kuca & Peter Brida & Ali Selamat, 2019. "Opinions on Sustainability of Smart Cities in the Context of Energy Challenges Posed by Cryptocurrency Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Yousra El Kihel, 2022. "Digital Transition Methodology of a Warehouse in the Concept of Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Pavel Ciaian & Andrej Cupak & Pirmin Fessler & d’Artis Kancs, 2022. "Environmental and Social Preferences and Investments in Crypto-Assets," JRC Research Reports JRC129919, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Kyungmoo Heo & Sangyoon Yi, 2023. "(De)centralization in the governance of blockchain systems: cryptocurrency cases," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 59-82, September.
    11. Giuliano Sansone & Flavio Santalucia & Davide Viglialoro & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "Blockchain for social good and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from a case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2182-2193, September.
    12. Nan Jiang & Qi Han & Guohua Zhu, 2023. "A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework: Textual Analysis and Comparison of Chinese and US Energy Blockchain Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Gabriella M. Hastig & ManMohan S. Sodhi, 2020. "Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 935-954, April.
    14. Hua, Weiqi & Jiang, Jing & Sun, Hongjian & Wu, Jianzhong, 2020. "A blockchain based peer-to-peer trading framework integrating energy and carbon markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    15. R Govindasamy & S Pooja Vardhini & Dhanya Sai Das, 2022. "Introduction to Cryptocurrency: An Overview," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 9-13, June.
    16. William Nikolakis & Lijo John & Harish Krishnan, 2018. "How Blockchain Can Shape Sustainable Global Value Chains: An Evidence, Verifiability, and Enforceability (EVE) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Vincent Tawiah & Abdulrasheed Zakari & Guo Li & Anthony Kyiu, 2022. "Blockchain technology and environmental efficiency: Evidence from US‐listed firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3757-3768, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41701-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.