IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-41124-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Pauli

    (University of Birmingham)

  • Inti A. Brazil

    (Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour)

  • Gregor Kohls

    (RWTH Aachen University
    Faculty of Medicine, TU)

  • Miriam C. Klein-Flügge

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • Jack C. Rogers

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Dimitris Dikeos

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)

  • Roberta Dochnal

    (Szeged University)

  • Graeme Fairchild

    (University of Bath)

  • Aranzazu Fernández-Rivas

    (Basurto University Hospital)

  • Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Amaia Hervas

    (University Hospital Mutua Terrassa)

  • Kerstin Konrad

    (RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Brain Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, RWTH Aachen and Research Centre Jülich)

  • Arne Popma

    (VU University Medical Center)

  • Christina Stadler

    (Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel)

  • Christine M. Freitag

    (University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University)

  • Stephane A. Brito

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Patricia L. Lockwood

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Oxford
    University of Oxford
    University of Birmingham)

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical accounts suggest that adolescence is associated with heightened reward learning and impulsivity. Experimental tasks and computational models that can dissociate reward learning from the tendency to initiate actions impulsively (action initiation bias) are thus critical to characterise the mechanisms that drive developmental differences. However, existing work has rarely quantified both learning ability and action initiation, or it has relied on small samples. Here, using computational modelling of a learning task collected from a large sample (N = 742, 9-18 years, 11 countries), we test differences in reward and punishment learning and action initiation from childhood to adolescence. Computational modelling reveals that whilst punishment learning rates increase with age, reward learning remains stable. In parallel, action initiation biases decrease with age. Results are similar when considering pubertal stage instead of chronological age. We conclude that heightened reward responsivity in adolescence can reflect differences in action initiation rather than enhanced reward learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Pauli & Inti A. Brazil & Gregor Kohls & Miriam C. Klein-Flügge & Jack C. Rogers & Dimitris Dikeos & Roberta Dochnal & Graeme Fairchild & Aranzazu Fernández-Rivas & Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann & Amaia, 2023. "Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41124-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41124-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41124-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-41124-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieke Jepma & Jessica V Schaaf & Ingmar Visser & Hilde M Huizenga, 2020. "Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Stefano Palminteri & Emma J Kilford & Giorgio Coricelli & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, 2016. "The Computational Development of Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Liyu Xia & Sarah L Master & Maria K Eckstein & Beth Baribault & Ronald E Dahl & Linda Wilbrecht & Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins, 2021. "Modeling changes in probabilistic reinforcement learning during adolescence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Marco K. Wittmann & Elsa Fouragnan & Davide Folloni & Miriam C. Klein-Flügge & Bolton K. H. Chau & Mehdi Khamassi & Matthew F. S. Rushworth, 2020. "Global reward state affects learning and activity in raphe nucleus and anterior insula in monkeys," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jo Cutler & Marco K. Wittmann & Ayat Abdurahman & Luca D. Hargitai & Daniel Drew & Masud Husain & Patricia L. Lockwood, 2021. "Ageing is associated with disrupted reinforcement learning whilst learning to help others is preserved," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia L. Lockwood & Jo Cutler & Daniel Drew & Ayat Abdurahman & Deva Sanjeeva Jeyaretna & Matthew A. J. Apps & Masud Husain & Sanjay G. Manohar, 2024. "Human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for prosocial motivation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1403-1416, July.
    2. Anna P. Giron & Simon Ciranka & Eric Schulz & Wouter Bos & Azzurra Ruggeri & Björn Meder & Charley M. Wu, 2023. "Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1955-1967, November.
    3. Ethan Trepka & Mehran Spitmaan & Bilal A. Bari & Vincent D. Costa & Jeremiah Y. Cohen & Alireza Soltani, 2021. "Entropy-based metrics for predicting choice behavior based on local response to reward," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Marieke Jepma & Jessica V Schaaf & Ingmar Visser & Hilde M Huizenga, 2020. "Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Maël Lebreton & Karin Bacily & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B Engelmann, 2019. "Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Stefano Palminteri & Germain Lefebvre & Emma J Kilford & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, 2017. "Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Elsa F. Fouragnan & Billy Hosking & Yin Cheung & Brooke Prakash & Matthew Rushworth & Alejandra Sel, 2024. "Timing along the cardiac cycle modulates neural signals of reward-based learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Caroline J. Charpentier & Qianying Wu & Seokyoung Min & Weilun Ding & Jeffrey Cockburn & John P. O’Doherty, 2024. "Heterogeneity in strategy use during arbitration between experiential and observational learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Colin W. Hoy & David R. Quiroga-Martinez & Eduardo Sandoval & David King-Stephens & Kenneth D. Laxer & Peter Weber & Jack J. Lin & Robert T. Knight, 2023. "Asymmetric coding of reward prediction errors in human insula and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Penghui Wang & Rui Ding & Wenjiao Shi & Jun Li, 2024. "Potential Reductions in the Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Production in Hubei Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. A. Calapai & J. Cabrera-Moreno & T. Moser & M. Jeschke, 2022. "Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41124-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.