IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-28778-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA

Author

Listed:
  • Yinqiu Ji

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology)

  • Christopher C. M. Baker

    (Harvard University
    US Army ERDC Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory)

  • Viorel D. Popescu

    (Ohio University
    University of Bucharest)

  • Jiaxin Wang

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology)

  • Chunying Wu

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology)

  • Zhengyang Wang

    (Harvard University)

  • Yuanheng Li

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology
    Harvard University)

  • Lin Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Chaolang Hua

    (Yunnan Forestry Survey and Planning Institute)

  • Zhongxing Yang

    (Yunnan Forestry Survey and Planning Institute)

  • Chunyan Yang

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology)

  • Charles C. Y. Xu

    (McGill University)

  • Alex Diana

    (University of Kent)

  • Qingzhong Wen

    (Yunnan Forestry Survey and Planning Institute)

  • Naomi E. Pierce

    (Harvard University)

  • Douglas W. Yu

    (Kunming Institute of Zoology
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of East Anglia)

Abstract

Protected areas are key to meeting biodiversity conservation goals, but direct measures of effectiveness have proven difficult to obtain. We address this challenge by using environmental DNA from leech-ingested bloodmeals to estimate spatially-resolved vertebrate occupancies across the 677 km2 Ailaoshan reserve in Yunnan, China. From 30,468 leeches collected by 163 park rangers across 172 patrol areas, we identify 86 vertebrate species, including amphibians, mammals, birds and squamates. Multi-species occupancy modelling shows that species richness increases with elevation and distance to reserve edge. Most large mammals (e.g. sambar, black bear, serow, tufted deer) follow this pattern; the exceptions are the three domestic mammal species (cows, sheep, goats) and muntjak deer, which are more common at lower elevations. Vertebrate occupancies are a direct measure of conservation outcomes that can help guide protected-area management and improve the contributions that protected areas make towards global biodiversity goals. Here, we show the feasibility of using invertebrate-derived DNA to estimate spatially-resolved vertebrate occupancies across entire protected areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinqiu Ji & Christopher C. M. Baker & Viorel D. Popescu & Jiaxin Wang & Chunying Wu & Zhengyang Wang & Yuanheng Li & Lin Wang & Chaolang Hua & Zhongxing Yang & Chunyan Yang & Charles C. Y. Xu & Alex D, 2022. "Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28778-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28778-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28778-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-28778-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rory Gibb & David W. Redding & Kai Qing Chin & Christl A. Donnelly & Tim M. Blackburn & Tim Newbold & Kate E. Jones, 2020. "Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7821), pages 398-402, August.
    2. Jim E. Griffin & Eleni Matechou & Andrew S. Buxton & Dimitrios Bormpoudakis & Richard A. Griffiths, 2020. "Modelling environmental DNA data; Bayesian variable selection accounting for false positive and false negative errors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 377-392, April.
    3. Zabel, Astrid & Roe, Brian, 2009. "Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 126-134, November.
    4. J. Andrew Royle, 2004. "N-Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 108-115, March.
    5. William F. Laurance & D. Carolina Useche & Julio Rendeiro & Margareta Kalka & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Sean P. Sloan & Susan G. Laurance & Mason Campbell & Kate Abernethy & Patricia Alvarez & Victor Arr, 2012. "Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 290-294, September.
    6. Cheri M. Ackerman & Cameron Myhrvold & Sri Gowtham Thakku & Catherine A. Freije & Hayden C. Metsky & David K. Yang & Simon H. Ye & Chloe K. Boehm & Tinna-Sólveig F. Kosoko-Thoroddsen & Jared Kehe & Ti, 2020. "Massively multiplexed nucleic acid detection with Cas13," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7811), pages 277-282, June.
    7. Paul Ferraro & Toshihiro Uchida & Jon Conrad, 2005. "Price Premiums for Eco-friendly Commodities: Are ‘Green’ Markets the Best Way to Protect Endangered Ecosystems?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 32(3), pages 419-438, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Zhang & Jason Rohr & Ruina Cui & Yusi Xin & Lixia Han & Xiaona Yang & Shimin Gu & Yuanbao Du & Jing Liang & Xuyu Wang & Zhengjun Wu & Qin Hao & Xuan Liu, 2022. "Biological invasions facilitate zoonotic disease emergences," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Samuel Xin Tham Lee & Zachary Amir & Jonathan H. Moore & Kaitlyn M. Gaynor & Matthew Scott Luskin, 2024. "Effects of human disturbances on wildlife behaviour and consequences for predator-prey overlap in Southeast Asia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Sidemo-Holm, William & Smith, Henrik G. & Brady, Mark V., 2018. "Improving agricultural pollution abatement through result-based payment schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 209-219.
    4. Stern, Nicholas & Sivropoulos-Valero, Anna Valero, 2021. "Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114385, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Nicholas Stern & Anna Valero, 2021. "Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions," CEP Discussion Papers dp1773, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2021. "From Goods to Services and from Linear to Circular: The Role of Servitization’s Challenges and Drivers in the Shifting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Steen, Valerie A. & Duarte, Adam & Peterson, James T., 2023. "An evaluation of multistate occupancy models for estimating relative abundance and population trends," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    8. Pham, Thu Thuy & Loft, Lasse & Bennett, Karen & Phuong, Vu Tan & Dung, Le Ngoc & Brunner, Jake, 2015. "Monitoring and evaluation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam: From myth to reality," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 220-229.
    9. Houdet, Joël & Trommetter, Michel & Weber, Jacques, 2012. "Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-46.
    10. Sattler, Claudia & Trampnau, Susanne & Schomers, Sarah & Meyer, Claas & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2013. "Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 31-45.
    11. Kecinski, Maik & Messer, Kent D. & Peo, Audrey J., 2018. "When Cleaning Too Much Pollution Can Be a Bad Thing: A Field Experiment of Consumer Demand for Oysters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 686-695.
    12. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhikun Mei & Xiyang Xu & Yongzhong Feng & Guangxin Ren, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Land Use Change in the Yellow River Basin of Shaanxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Herzon, I. & Birge, T. & Allen, B. & Povellato, A. & Vanni, F. & Hart, K. & Radley, G. & Tucker, G. & Keenleyside, C. & Oppermann, R. & Underwood, E. & Poux, X. & Beaufoy, G. & Pražan, J., 2018. "Time to look for evidence: Results-based approach to biodiversity conservation on farmland in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 347-354.
    14. Magdalena Meyer & Dominik W. Melville & Heather J. Baldwin & Kerstin Wilhelm & Evans Ewald Nkrumah & Ebenezer K. Badu & Samuel Kingsley Oppong & Nina Schwensow & Adam Stow & Peter Vallo & Victor M. Co, 2024. "Bat species assemblage predicts coronavirus prevalence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Perry J. Williams & Cody Schroeder & Pat Jackson, 2020. "Estimating Reproduction and Survival of Unmarked Juveniles Using Aerial Images and Marked Adults," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 133-147, June.
    16. Henry T. Reich, 2020. "Optimal sampling design and the accuracy of occupancy models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 1017-1027, September.
    17. Cecilia A. Sánchez & Hongying Li & Kendra L. Phelps & Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio & Lin-Fa Wang & Peng Zhou & Zheng-Li Shi & Kevin J. Olival & Peter Daszak, 2022. "A strategy to assess spillover risk of bat SARS-related coronaviruses in Southeast Asia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Cecilia Parracciani & Robert Buitenwerf & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2023. "Impacts of Climate Change on Vegetation in Kenya: Future Projections and Implications for Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Guzhen Zhou & Wuyang Hu & Wenchao Huang, 2016. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Sustainable Products? A Study of Eco-Labeled Tuna Steak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Chaplin, S.P. & Mills, J. & Chiswell, H., 2021. "Developing payment-by-results approaches for agri-environment schemes: Experience from an arable trial in England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28778-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.