IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-27302-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Lluís Hernández-Navarro

    (IDIBAPS)

  • Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal

    (IDIBAPS)

  • Daniel Duque

    (IDIBAPS)

  • Jaime de la Rocha

    (IDIBAPS)

  • Alexandre Hyafil

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Center of Mathematical Research)

Abstract

Standard models of perceptual decision-making postulate that a response is triggered in reaction to stimulus presentation when the accumulated stimulus evidence reaches a decision threshold. This framework excludes however the possibility that informed responses are generated proactively at a time independent of stimulus. Here, we find that, in a free reaction time auditory task in rats, reactive and proactive responses coexist, suggesting that choice selection and motor initiation, commonly viewed as serial processes, are decoupled in general. We capture this behavior by a novel model in which proactive and reactive responses are triggered whenever either of two competing processes, respectively Action Initiation or Evidence Accumulation, reaches a bound. In both types of response, the choice is ultimately informed by the Evidence Accumulation process. The Action Initiation process readily explains premature responses, contributes to urgency effects at long reaction times and mediates the slowing of the responses as animals get satiated and tired during sessions. Moreover, it successfully predicts reaction time distributions when the stimulus was either delayed, advanced or omitted. Overall, these results fundamentally extend standard models of evidence accumulation in decision making by showing that proactive and reactive processes compete for the generation of responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Lluís Hernández-Navarro & Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Daniel Duque & Jaime de la Rocha & Alexandre Hyafil, 2021. "Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27302-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27302-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27302-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-27302-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon P. Kelly & Elaine A. Corbett & Redmond G. O’Connell, 2021. "Neurocomputational mechanisms of prior-informed perceptual decision-making in humans," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 467-481, April.
    2. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Alexandre Hyafil & Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco & Santiago Jaramillo & David Robbe & Jaime Rocha, 2020. "Author Correction: Response outcomes gate the impact of expectations on perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, December.
    3. Timothy D. Hanks & Charles D. Kopec & Bingni W. Brunton & Chunyu A. Duan & Jeffrey C. Erlich & Carlos D. Brody, 2015. "Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7546), pages 220-223, April.
    4. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Alexandre Hyafil & Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco & Santiago Jaramillo & David Robbe & Jaime Rocha, 2020. "Response outcomes gate the impact of expectations on perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Joshua A. Seideman & Terrence R. Stanford & Emilio Salinas, 2018. "Saccade metrics reflect decision-making dynamics during urgent choices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Genís Prat-Ortega & Klaus Wimmer & Alex Roxin & Jaime Rocha, 2021. "Flexible categorization in perceptual decision making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Klaus Wimmer & Albert Compte & Alex Roxin & Diogo Peixoto & Alfonso Renart & Jaime de la Rocha, 2015. "Sensory integration dynamics in a hierarchical network explains choice probabilities in cortical area MT," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Natalie A. Steinemann & Redmond G. O’Connell & Simon P. Kelly, 2018. "Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Arbora Resulaj & Roozbeh Kiani & Daniel M. Wolpert & Michael N. Shadlen, 2009. "Changes of mind in decision-making," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7261), pages 263-266, September.
    10. Yu Hu & Joel Zylberberg & Eric Shea-Brown, 2014. "The Sign Rule and Beyond: Boundary Effects, Flexibility, and Noise Correlations in Neural Population Codes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Robert M. Hardwick & Alexander D. Forrence & John W. Krakauer & Adrian M. Haith, 2019. "Time-dependent competition between goal-directed and habitual response preparation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 1252-1262, December.
    12. Peter R. Murphy & Evert Boonstra & Sander Nieuwenhuis, 2016. "Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:6:p:437-449 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan & Alexandre Pouget & Gregory C DeAngelis & Dora E Angelaki & Xaq Pitkow, 2018. "Inferring decoding strategies for multiple correlated neural populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-40, September.
    2. Diksha Gupta & Brian DePasquale & Charles D. Kopec & Carlos D. Brody, 2024. "Trial-history biases in evidence accumulation can give rise to apparent lapses in decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. J. Tyler Boyd-Meredith & Alex T. Piet & Emily Jane Dennis & Ahmed El Hady & Carlos D. Brody, 2022. "Stable choice coding in rat frontal orienting fields across model-predicted changes of mind," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Tao Xie & Markus Adamek & Hohyun Cho & Matthew A. Adamo & Anthony L. Ritaccio & Jon T. Willie & Peter Brunner & Jan Kubanek, 2024. "Graded decisions in the human brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Pierre O. Boucher & Tian Wang & Laura Carceroni & Gary Kane & Krishna V. Shenoy & Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, 2023. "Initial conditions combine with sensory evidence to induce decision-related dynamics in premotor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    6. I. Hachen & S. Reinartz & R. Brasselet & A. Stroligo & M. E. Diamond, 2021. "Dynamics of history-dependent perceptual judgment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Richard D Lange & Ankani Chattoraj & Jeffrey M Beck & Jacob L Yates & Ralf M Haefner, 2021. "A confirmation bias in perceptual decision-making due to hierarchical approximate inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, November.
    8. Anne E. Urai & Tobias H. Donner, 2022. "Persistent activity in human parietal cortex mediates perceptual choice repetition bias," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Matthias Fritsche & Antara Majumdar & Lauren Strickland & Samuel Liebana Garcia & Rafal Bogacz & Armin Lak, 2024. "Temporal regularities shape perceptual decisions and striatal dopamine signals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Damian M. Herz & Manuel Bange & Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla & Miriam Auer & Keyoumars Ashkan & Petra Fischer & Huiling Tan & Rafal Bogacz & Muthuraman Muthuraman & Sergiu Groppa & Peter Brown, 2022. "Dynamic control of decision and movement speed in the human basal ganglia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Jacob D Davidson & Ahmed El Hady, 2019. "Foraging as an evidence accumulation process," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Andrew M. Clark & David C. Bradley, 2022. "A neural correlate of perceptual segmentation in macaque middle temporal cortical area," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Hébert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2023. "Rational inattention when decisions take time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Adrian M Haith & David M Huberdeau & John W Krakauer, 2015. "Hedging Your Bets: Intermediate Movements as Optimal Behavior in the Context of an Incomplete Decision," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Wan-Yu Shih & Hsiang-Yu Yu & Cheng-Chia Lee & Chien-Chen Chou & Chien Chen & Paul W. Glimcher & Shih-Wei Wu, 2023. "Electrophysiological population dynamics reveal context dependencies during decision making in human frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Andrea Insabato & Mario Pannunzi & Gustavo Deco, 2017. "Multiple Choice Neurodynamical Model of the Uncertain Option Task," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Charles-Cadogan, G., 2021. "Market Instability, Investor Sentiment, And Probability Judgment Error in Index Option Prices," CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series 71, Centre for Research in Economic Theory and its Applications CRETA.
    18. Jui-Tai Chen & Ying-Chun Kuo & Tzu-Yu Hsu & Chin-An Wang, 2022. "Fatigue and Arousal Modulations Revealed by Saccade and Pupil Dynamics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Kobe Desender & Luc Vermeylen & Tom Verguts, 2022. "Dynamic influences on static measures of metacognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Shariq N Iqbal & Lun Yin & Caroline B Drucker & Qian Kuang & Jean-François Gariépy & Michael L Platt & John M Pearson, 2019. "Latent goal models for dynamic strategic interaction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27302-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.