IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26104-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of history-dependent perceptual judgment

Author

Listed:
  • I. Hachen

    (Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA))

  • S. Reinartz

    (Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA)
    Basel University)

  • R. Brasselet

    (Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA)
    Time Perception Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA))

  • A. Stroligo

    (Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA))

  • M. E. Diamond

    (Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA))

Abstract

Identical physical inputs do not always evoke identical percepts. To investigate the role of stimulus history in tactile perception, we designed a task in which rats had to judge each vibrissal vibration, in a long series, as strong or weak depending on its mean speed. After a low-speed stimulus (trial n − 1), rats were more likely to report the next stimulus (trial n) as strong, and after a high-speed stimulus, they were more likely to report the next stimulus as weak, a repulsive effect that did not depend on choice or reward on trial n − 1. This effect could be tracked over several preceding trials (i.e., n − 2 and earlier) and was characterized by an exponential decay function, reflecting a trial-by-trial incorporation of sensory history. Surprisingly, the influence of trial n − 1 strengthened as the time interval between n − 1 and n grew. Human subjects receiving fingertip vibrations showed these same key findings. We are able to account for the repulsive stimulus history effect, and its detailed time scale, through a single-parameter model, wherein each new stimulus gradually updates the subject’s decision criterion. This model points to mechanisms underlying how the past affects the ongoing subjective experience.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Hachen & S. Reinartz & R. Brasselet & A. Stroligo & M. E. Diamond, 2021. "Dynamics of history-dependent perceptual judgment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26104-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26104-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26104-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26104-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paymon Ashourian & Yonatan Loewenstein, 2011. "Bayesian Inference Underlies the Contraction Bias in Delayed Comparison Tasks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Alexandre Hyafil & Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco & Santiago Jaramillo & David Robbe & Jaime Rocha, 2020. "Author Correction: Response outcomes gate the impact of expectations on perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, December.
    3. Kiyohito Iigaya & Madalena S. Fonseca & Masayoshi Murakami & Zachary F. Mainen & Peter Dayan, 2018. "An effect of serotonergic stimulation on learning rates for rewards apparent after long intertrial intervals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Athena Akrami & Charles D. Kopec & Mathew E. Diamond & Carlos D. Brody, 2018. "Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7692), pages 368-372, February.
    5. Anne E. Urai & Anke Braun & Tobias H. Donner, 2017. "Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Ofri Raviv & Itay Lieder & Yonatan Loewenstein & Merav Ahissar, 2014. "Contradictory behavioral biases result from the influence of past stimuli on perception," Discussion Paper Series dp672, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Alexandre Hyafil & Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco & Santiago Jaramillo & David Robbe & Jaime Rocha, 2020. "Response outcomes gate the impact of expectations on perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Urit Gordon & Shimon Marom & Naama Brenner, 2019. "Visual detection of time-varying signals: Opposing biases and their timescales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Ofri Raviv & Itay Lieder & Yonatan Loewenstein & Merav Ahissar, 2014. "Contradictory Behavioral Biases Result from the Influence of Past Stimuli on Perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Reinartz & Arash Fassihi & Maria Ravera & Luciano Paz & Francesca Pulecchi & Marco Gigante & Mathew E. Diamond, 2024. "Direct contribution of the sensory cortex to the judgment of stimulus duration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne E. Urai & Tobias H. Donner, 2022. "Persistent activity in human parietal cortex mediates perceptual choice repetition bias," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Diksha Gupta & Brian DePasquale & Charles D. Kopec & Carlos D. Brody, 2024. "Trial-history biases in evidence accumulation can give rise to apparent lapses in decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Lluís Hernández-Navarro & Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal & Daniel Duque & Jaime de la Rocha & Alexandre Hyafil, 2021. "Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Andrew Mah & Shannon S. Schiereck & Veronica Bossio & Christine M. Constantinople, 2023. "Distinct value computations support rapid sequential decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D Daw, 2020. "A simple model for learning in volatile environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Sean Duffy & John Smith, 2020. "On the category adjustment model: another look at Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Vevea (2000)," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 19(1), pages 163-193, June.
    7. Drew C. Schreiner & Christian Cazares & Rafael Renteria & Christina M. Gremel, 2022. "Information normally considered task-irrelevant drives decision-making and affects premotor circuit recruitment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Dobromir Rahnev & Kobe Desender & Alan L. F. Lee & William T. Adler & David Aguilar-Lleyda & Başak Akdoğan & Polina Arbuzova & Lauren Y. Atlas & Fuat Balcı & Ji Won Bang & Indrit Bègue & Damian P. Bir, 2020. "The Confidence Database," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 317-325, March.
    9. Sebastian Reinartz & Arash Fassihi & Maria Ravera & Luciano Paz & Francesca Pulecchi & Marco Gigante & Mathew E. Diamond, 2024. "Direct contribution of the sensory cortex to the judgment of stimulus duration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Sagi Jaffe-Dax & Ofri Raviv & Nori Jacoby & Yonatan Loewenstein & Merav Ahissar, 2015. "A computational model of implicit memory captures dyslexics’ perceptual deficits," Discussion Paper Series dp690, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    11. Shinichiro Kira & Houman Safaai & Ari S. Morcos & Stefano Panzeri & Christopher D. Harvey, 2023. "A distributed and efficient population code of mixed selectivity neurons for flexible navigation decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Xin Wei Chia & Jian Kwang Tan & Lee Fang Ang & Tsukasa Kamigaki & Hiroshi Makino, 2023. "Emergence of cortical network motifs for short-term memory during learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Erfan Zabeh & Nicholas C. Foley & Joshua Jacobs & Jacqueline P. Gottlieb, 2023. "Beta traveling waves in monkey frontal and parietal areas encode recent reward history," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Filip-Mihai Toma & Cosmin-Octavian Cepoi & Matei Nicolae Kubinschi & Makoto Miyakoshi, 2023. "Gazing through the bubble: an experimental investigation into financial risk-taking using eye-tracking," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Manuel Rausch & Michael Zehetleitner, 2019. "The folded X-pattern is not necessarily a statistical signature of decision confidence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Mario Treviño & Santiago Castiello & Oscar Arias-Carrión & Braniff De la Torre-Valdovinos & Ricardo Medina Coss y León, 2021. "Isomorphic decisional biases across perceptual tasks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Ofri Raviv & Merav Ahissar & Yonatan Loewenstein, 2012. "How Recent History Affects Perception: The Normative Approach and Its Heuristic Approximation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Sarah R., Allred & L. Elizabeth, Crawford & Sean, Duffy & John, Smith, 2015. "Working memory and spatial judgments: Cognitive load increases the central tendency bias," MPRA Paper 63520, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Marc T. P. Adam & Jan Krämer, 2022. "Evaluating the emotional bidding framework: new evidence from a decade of neurophysiology," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1529-1540, September.
    20. Kaushik J. Lakshminarasimhan & Eric Avila & Xaq Pitkow & Dora E. Angelaki, 2023. "Dynamical latent state computation in the male macaque posterior parietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26104-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.