IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2016064020677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Cluster Analysis and the Principal Component Analysis in Evaluating the Quality of a Destination

Author

Listed:
  • Ida Vajčnerová

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jakub Šácha

    (Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Kateřina Ryglová

    (Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Žiaran

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to explore possibilities of evaluating the quality of a tourist destination by means of the principal components analysis (PCA) and the cluster analysis. In the paper both types of analysis are compared on the basis of the results they provide. The aim is to identify advantage and limits of both methods and provide methodological suggestion for their further use in the tourism research. The analyses is based on the primary data from the customers' satisfaction survey with the key quality factors of a destination. As output of the two statistical methods is creation of groups or cluster of quality factors that are similar in terms of respondents' evaluations, in order to facilitate the evaluation of the quality of tourist destinations. Results shows the possibility to use both tested methods. The paper is elaborated in the frame of wider research project aimed to develop a methodology for the quality evaluation of tourist destinations, especially in the context of customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ida Vajčnerová & Jakub Šácha & Kateřina Ryglová & Pavel Žiaran, 2016. "Using the Cluster Analysis and the Principal Component Analysis in Evaluating the Quality of a Destination," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 677-682.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2016064020677
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664020677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201664020677.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201664020677.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201664020677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Žabkar, Vesna & Brenčič, Maja Makovec & Dmitrović, Tanja, 2010. "Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 537-546.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Guo & Xiaoying Liu & Hakjun Song, 2021. "Structural Relationships among Strategic Experiential Modules, Motivation, Serious Leisure, Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Bicycle Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Feng Xu & Wenxia Niu & Shuaishuai Li & Yuli Bai, 2020. "The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    3. Moore, Susan A. & Rodger, Kate & Taplin, Ross H., 2017. "Developing a better understanding of the complexities of visitor loyalty to Karijini National Park, Western Australia," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 20-28.
    4. Liu, Yuqing & Schuberth, Florian & Liu, Yide & Henseler, Jörg, 2022. "Modeling and assessing forged concepts in tourism and hospitality using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 221-230.
    5. Su, Lujun & Swanson, Scott R. & Chen, Xiaohong, 2016. "The effects of perceived service quality on repurchase intentions and subjective well-being of Chinese tourists: The mediating role of relationship quality," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 82-95.
    6. Vašaničová Petra & Litavcová Eva & Jenčová Sylvia, 2018. "Occupancy of the Slovak Accommodation Establishments by Foreign Tourists," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 133-152, December.
    7. Prajitmutita, Lyn Manassannan & Perényi, à ron & Prentice, Catherine, 2016. "Quality, Value? – Insights into Medical Tourists’ Attitudes and Behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 207-216.
    8. Castellano, Rosalia & Chelli, Francesco M. & Ciommi, Mariateresa & Musella, Gaetano & Punzo, Gennaro & Salvati, Luca, 2020. "Trahit sua quemque voluptas. The multidimensional satisfaction of foreign tourists visiting Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Chia-Wen Lee & Ching Li, 2019. "The Process of Constructing a Health Tourism Destination Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Afonso, Carolina & Silva, Graça Miranda & Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Duarte, Margarida, 2018. "The role of motivations and involvement in wine tourists' intention to return: SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 313-321.
    11. Prentice, Catherine & Kadan, Mariam, 2019. "The role of airport service quality in airport and destination choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-48.
    12. Syahmardi Yacob & Erida Erida & Ade Perdana Siregar, 2021. "The loyalty of rural tourism destination: A perspective of destination quality perception, satisfaction, and behavior intention in Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(7), pages 257-265, October.
    13. Taplin, Ross H., 2013. "The influence of competition on visitor satisfaction and loyalty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 238-246.
    14. Ryglová Kateřina & Rašovská Ida & Šácha Jakub, 2017. "Rural Tourism – Evaluating the Quality of Destination," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 769-788, December.
    15. Marimuthu, Malliga, 2019. "Young mothers’ acceptance of herbal food supplements: Centred on preventive health behaviour for children," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 311-319.
    16. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos & Simeli, Ioanna, 2017. "Delegate satisfaction from conference service quality and its impact on future behavioural intentions," EconStor Conference Papers 215864, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Munazza Saeed & Imran Shafique, 2021. "Green customer-based brand equity and green purchase consumption behaviour: the moderating role of religious commitment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13284-13303, September.
    18. Taheri, Babak & Jafari, Aliakbar & O'Gorman, Kevin, 2014. "Keeping your audience: Presenting a visitor engagement scale," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 321-329.
    19. Forgas-Coll, Santiago & Palau-Saumell, Ramon & Sánchez-García, Javier & Callarisa-Fiol, Luís J., 2012. "Urban destination loyalty drivers and cross-national moderator effects: The case of Barcelona," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1309-1320.
    20. Parmita Saha & Atanu Nath, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework of Festival Visitors’ Behavioral Intentions," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2016064020677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.