IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jfsjnl/v6y2017i1p31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to Implementing Food Safety and Produce Handling Training in School Meal Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra C. Curwood
  • Susan W. Arendt
  • Lakshman Rajagopal
  • Stephen W. Sapp

Abstract

This study explored school foodservice directors’ (FSDs’) attitudes, influencers, knowledge about safe produce handling, and perceived challenges related to food safety training using Ajzen’s (1985) theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a theoretical underpinning. A web-based questionnaire was developed, pilot tested, and sent to all 864 public school districts in California. Demographic data, knowledge scores, attitudes, influencers, and challenges are reported using descriptive statistics and t-tests. Most respondent school FSDs (n=136, response rate of 16.4%) were female, between the ages of 35-64, with a least a bachelors’ degree, and more than 10 years of school foodservice experience. Most districts were self-operated, small, at least 50% free and reduced eligibility, and had conventional kitchens with speed-scratch preparation. School FSDs’ attitude towards offering food safety training had the highest level of agreement regarding maintaining department reputation. The health inspector was identified as having the greatest likelihood to think food safety training should be offered. The noted perceived challenge to providing food safety training was “employee scheduling availability.†Findings identified 84.4% (n= 108) of respondents had a Certified Food Safety Protection (CFPM) certification and12.6% (n= 16) attended USDA’s Produce Safety University (PSU) with no significant differences in knowledge scores based on either having attended USDA’s PSU or having CFPM certification. Regarding knowledge questions, 24.4% answered all six correctly (n= 125-127). School foodservice staff need adequate food safety training and safe produce handling practices as part of their food safety management plan. Produce safety training can be supported by state agencies and professional organizations.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra C. Curwood & Susan W. Arendt & Lakshman Rajagopal & Stephen W. Sapp, 2017. "Challenges to Implementing Food Safety and Produce Handling Training in School Meal Programs," Journal of Food Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 1-31, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jfsjnl:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jfs/article/download/11669/9370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jfs/article/view/11669
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Kuder & M. Richardson, 1937. "The theory of the estimation of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 2(3), pages 151-160, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Fairus Abd Rahman & Nitanan Koshy Matthew, 2021. "Fish Hobbyists’ Willingness to Donate for Wild Fighting Fish ( Betta livida ) Conservation in Klang Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Saokhamkeo, Phoukeo & Dokmaithes, Rapee & Chompoo, Jamnian & Kheerajitt, Cherdpong, 2023. "Factors influencing the practice of commercial rice production for food security in Vientiane capital, Laos," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(02), January.
    3. Beltran-Catalan, Maria & Cruz-Catalan, Esther, 2020. "How long bullying last? A comparison between a self-reported general bullying-victimization question and specific bullying-victimization questions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. von Borzyskowski, Inken & Wahman, Michael, 2018. "Systematic measurement error in election violence data: causes and consequences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. W. Nicewander, 1990. "A latent-trait based reliability estimate and upper bound," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 65-74, March.
    6. Nongyao Kasatpibal & Nongkran Viseskul & Wimonsiri Srikantha & Warunee Fongkaew & Natthakarn Surapagdee & Richard M. Grimes, 2014. "Effects of Internet‐based instruction on HIV‐prevention knowledge and practices among men who have sex with men," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 514-520, December.
    7. Eduardo Iacoponi & Jair de Jesus Mari, 1989. "Reliability and Factor Structure of the Portuguese Version of Self-Reporting Questionnaire," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 35(3), pages 213-222, September.
    8. Samuel A. Markolf & Kelly Klima & Terrence L. Wong, 2015. "Adaptation frameworks used by US decision-makers: a literature review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 427-436, December.
    9. Peitzmeier, Sarah M. & Wirtz, Andrea L. & Humes, Elizabeth & Hughto, Jaclyn M.W. & Cooney, Erin & Reisner, Sari L., 2021. "The transgender-specific intimate partner violence scale for research and practice: Validation in a sample of transgender women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    10. Volker Seiler, 2013. "Comment on Ameriks, Caplin, Leahy & Tyler (2007): Measuring Self-Control Problems," Working Papers CIE 61, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    11. Robert Wherry & Richard Gaylord, 1943. "The concept of test and item reliability in relation to factor pattern," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 8(4), pages 247-264, December.
    12. Harold Gulliksen, 1943. "A course in the theory of mental tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 8(4), pages 223-245, December.
    13. Tosi, Marco & van den Broek, Thijs, 2020. "Gray divorce and mental health in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    15. Jiang, Jingxian & Ellis, Gary D. & Ettekal, Andrea V. & Nelson, Chad, 2022. "Situational engagement experiences: Measurement options and theory testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 223-236.
    16. Gilles E. Gignac & Elizabeth Ooi, 2022. "Measurement error in research on financial literacy: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 938-956, June.
    17. María Vera & José A. Cortés, 2021. "Emotional and Cognitive Aptitudes and Successful Academic Performance: Using the ECCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Eunseong Cho, 2021. "Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 877-886, December.
    19. Yuval Feldman & Eliran Halali, 2019. "Regulating “Good” People in Subtle Conflicts of Interest Situations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 65-83, January.
    20. Tarkkonen, L. & Vehkalahti, K., 2005. "Measurement errors in multivariate measurement scales," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 172-189, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jfsjnl:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macrothink Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jfs.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.