IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v51y2002i3p269-286n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Familiengeld und Kindergeld als Instrumente der Familienförderung

Author

Listed:
  • Eekhoffund Johann

    (Universität zu Köln, Wirtschaftspolitisches Seminar, 7. Stock, WiSo-Hochhaus, D - 50923 Köln)

  • Henman Barbara

    (Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik an der Universität zu Köln, Pohligstraße 1, D - 50969 Köln)

Abstract

In this article the consistency, redistributional effects and work incentives of the support payment for dependent children (Kindergeld) in Germany are discussed. The child benefit, although paid out as a lump-sum, does not lead to an equal monetary transfer per child. The transfer rather depends on the family-income, as the support is optional to taking tax allowances for dependent children (Kinderfreibeträge). Considering that child allowances are no tax benefits, but lead to an equal taxation of taxpayers with children and without, the remaining transfer, the net child benefit, depends on the families tax burden paid on the - otherwise tax-free - income needed for child maintenance. Due to the progressive income taxrate the tax surcharges are increasing with the income and the net-transfer per child decreases accordingly. This leads to disincentives to work for parents. The reasoning and general rules of distribution behind the optional child benefit remain unclear. The payment does not serve welfare purposes as it counts against the supplementary welfare benefits (Sozialhilfe), which secure a minimum income of the poor. The income related transfer also does not generally recognize the upbringing of children, e. g. to make up for disadvantages families face in some of the social insurances on a pay-as-you-go basis, above all the pension insurance fund (gesetzliche Rentenversicherung). The authors argue for a separation of both instruments - the child support payment and the allowances for children. In addition, the current disadvantages of families in the pension insurance fund demand systematic family oriented reforms within the pay-as-yougo system.

Suggested Citation

  • Eekhoffund Johann & Henman Barbara, 2002. "Familiengeld und Kindergeld als Instrumente der Familienförderung," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 51(3), pages 269-286, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:51:y:2002:i:3:p:269-286:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2002-0304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2002-0304
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2002-0304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Werding, 2000. "Familienpolitik: Das "Familiengeld"-Konzept der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 53(01), pages 24-30, January.
    2. Jörg Althammer, 2002. "Familienbesteuerung - Reformen ohne Ende?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(1), pages 67-82.
    3. Homburg, Stefan, 1997. "Ursachen und Wirkungen eines zwischenstaatlichen Finanzausgleichs," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 61-95.
    4. Martin Werding, 2000. "Familienpolitik: Das "Familiengeld"-Konzept der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 53(1-2), pages 24-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fichte, Damian, 2013. "Zweckentfremdung der Rentenrücklage - und wie sie künftig verhindert werden könnte," DSi kompakt 7, DSi - Deutsches Steuerzahlerinstitut des Bundes der Steuerzahler e.V., Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Schwager, 1999. "The Theory of Administrative Federalism: An Alternative to Fiscal Centralization and Decentralization," Public Finance Review, , vol. 27(3), pages 282-309, May.
    2. Volker Arnold, 2005. "Competitive Versus Cooperative Federalism: Is a Fiscal Equalization Scheme Necessary from an Allocative Point of View?/ Kompetitiver versus kooperativer Föderalismus: Ist ein horizontaler Finanzausgle," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 225(3), pages 3-26, June.
    3. Stahl, Dieter, 2005. "Ausgleichsgrad und Anzeizwirkungen des deutschen Länderfinanzausgleichs: Eine kritische Analyse," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Färber, Gisela (ed.), Das föderative System in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme, Reformbedarf und Handlungsempfehlungen aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht, volume 127, pages 206-230, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Wiberg, Magnus, 2010. "Political Participation, Regional Policy and the Location of Industry," Research Papers in Economics 2010:5, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    5. Schwager, Robert, 1999. "Democratisation versus accountability - should the European Parliament be given more powers?," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-45, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Christian Dudel, 2009. "The Demographic Dilemma: Fertility, Female Labor Force Participation and Future Growth in Germany 2007-2060," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 158, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Friedrich Schneider & Hans Pitlik & Harald Strotmann & Günther Schmid, 2001. "On the politicization of intergovernmental fiscal relations in Germany after unification," Economics working papers 2001-05, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    8. Warneryd, Karl, 1998. "Distributional conflict and jurisdictional organization," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 435-450, September.
    9. Wiberg, Magnus, 2011. "The Comparative Political Economy of Economic Geography," Research Papers in Economics 2011:21, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    10. Magnus Wiberg, 2015. "The comparative political economy of the location of industry," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 48(1), pages 134-154, February.
    11. Neumann, Michael & Berthold, Norbert, 2004. "Europäische Strukturpolitik - Gift für rückständige Regionen?," Discussion Paper Series 74, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    12. Borck, Rainald & Owings, Stephanie, 2003. "The political economy of intergovernmental grants," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 139-156, March.
    13. Wiberg, Magnus, 2011. "Political participation, regional policy and the location of industry," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 465-475, September.
    14. Schmidt, Torsten, 2001. "Finanzreformen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Analyse der Veränderungen der Finanzverfassung von 1949 bis 1989," RWI Schriften, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, volume 67, number 67.
    15. Alexandre Baclet & Fabien Dell & Viktor Steiner & Katharina Wrohlich, 2005. "Verteilungseffekte der staatlichen Familienförderung: ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich ; Kurzexpertise ; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Forschungs," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 9, number pbk9.
    16. Wörz, Markus, 2011. "Family dissolution and public policies in Germany: Social provisions and institutional changes since the 1980s," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2011-207, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Baclet, Alexandre & Dell, Fabien & Wrohlich, Katharina, 2005. "Income Taxation and Household Size: Would French Family Splitting Make German Families Better Off?," IZA Discussion Papers 1894, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Bofinger, Peter & Buch, Claudia M. & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Wieland, Volker, 2013. "Gegen eine rückwärtsgewandte Wirtschaftspolitik. Jahresgutachten 2013/14 [Against a backward-looking economic policy. Annual Report 2013/14]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201314, February.
    19. Hans Pitlik & Friedrich Schneider & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Legislative Malapportionment and the Politicization of Germany's Intergovernmental Transfer System," Public Finance Review, , vol. 34(6), pages 637-662, November.
    20. Dilla, Diana, 2017. "Staatsverschuldung und Verschuldungsmentalität [Public Debt and Debt Mentality]," MPRA Paper 79432, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:51:y:2002:i:3:p:269-286:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.