IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A vállalkozások fenntartható tevékenysége. A taxonómiarendelet hatásainak piacelméleti modellezése
[Sustainable business activities. Theoretical modelling of the effects of the taxonomy regulation]

Author

Listed:
  • Böcskei, Elvira
  • Somogyi, Róbert

Abstract

Tanulmányunkban az Európai Parlament és Tanács által elfogadott taxonómia ren de let lehetséges gazdasági hatásait vizsgáltuk. A Bizottság a tájékoztatási kötelezettséget a nagyvállalatokra vonatkozóan írja elő, amelyek kötelesek tájékoztatást adni arról, hogy vállalkozási tevékenységük milyen módon és mértékben kapcsolódik környezeti szempontból fenntarthatónak minősülő gazdasági tevékenységekhez. Ugyanakkor a kis- és középvállalkozások jelenleg önkéntes alapon dönthetnek arról, hogy közzéteszik-e a fenntarthatóságra vonatkozó információkat. Tanulmányunkban a fenntartható vállalkozások fogalmi meghatározását követően definiáltuk a fenntartható vállalkozásokat, a taxonómiarendelet címzettjeit, továbbá a gazdasági, környezeti és társadalmi hatások relevanciáját. Játékelméleti modellünkben három alternatív lehetőséget vizsgáltunk a társadalmi jólét szempontjából. A szabályozás nélküli állapot mellett azt elemeztük, hogy milyen hatásai lehetnek a jelenlegi szabályozásnak, továbbá egy lehetséges jövőbeli szabályozásnak, amely már a kis- és középvállalati szektort is bevonja a fenntarthatósággal kapcsolatos információszolgáltatásba, különösen annak ismeretében, hogy a Bizottság is vizsgálja ennek lehetőségét.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: D43, L13, Q58.

Suggested Citation

  • Böcskei, Elvira & Somogyi, Róbert, 2023. "A vállalkozások fenntartható tevékenysége. A taxonómiarendelet hatásainak piacelméleti modellezése [Sustainable business activities. Theoretical modelling of the effects of the taxonomy regulation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 432-450.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2119
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2023.4.432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2119
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2023.4.432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Montes & Wilfried Sand-Zantman & Tommaso Valletti, 2019. "The Value of Personal Information in Online Markets with Endogenous Privacy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1342-1362, March.
    2. Heiko Karle & Martin Peitz & Markus Reisinger, 2020. "Segmentation versus Agglomeration: Competition between Platforms with Competitive Sellers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2329-2374.
    3. Laura Sierra-Garcia & Maria Antonia Garcia-Benau & Helena Maria Bollas-Araya, 2018. "Empirical Analysis of Non-Financial Reporting by Spanish Companies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579110003277 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Darrel Brown & Jesse Dillard & R. Scott Marshall, 2006. "Triple Bottom Line: A business metaphor for a social construct," Working Papers 0602, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Mar 2006.
    6. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899.
    7. John Paull, 2013. "The Rachel Carson Letters and the Making of Silent Spring," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, June.
    8. Elias Carroni, 2018. "Poaching in media: Harm to subscribers?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 221-236, June.
    9. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170810892127 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Deegan, Craig & Blomquist, Christopher, 2006. "Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 343-372.
    11. Johanna Gast & Katherine Gundolf & Beate Cesinger, 2017. "Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02008555, HAL.
    12. Keith T. Maunders & Roger L. Burritt, 1991. "Accounting and Ecological Crisis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(3), pages 1-1, September.
    13. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2011. "Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 222-237, May.
    14. Beate Littig & Erich Griessler, 2005. "Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 65-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manpreet Rajpal & Bindu Singh, 2024. "How to drive sustainable entrepreneurial intentions: Unraveling the nexus of entrepreneurship education ecosystem, attitude and orientation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1705-1721, May.
    2. Aikaterini Argyrou & Nicolas Chevrollier & Andre Nijhof, 2023. "The versatile role of sustainable market entrepreneurs in market transformation: An intervention framework for institutional change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 259-273, January.
    3. Hiroshi Aiura & Toshiki Kodera, 2024. "Location-price competition with freight absorption pricing in a data sharing economy," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Jullien, Bruno & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2021. "The Economics of Platforms: A Theory Guide for Competition Policy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Joana Carolina, Chaves-Vargas & Gabriela, Ribes-Giner & Ismael, Moya-Clemente, 2024. "Effect of the economic, social and technological factors on sustainable entrepreneurship over time," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Abdesselam, Rafik & Kedjar, Malia & Renou-Maissant, Patricia, 2024. "What are the drivers of eco-innovation? Empirical evidence from French start-ups," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Ying Guo & Lifang Wang, 2022. "Environmental Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Environmental Innovation and Stakeholder Pressure," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, February.
    8. Esmee D. Kooijman & Siobhan McQuaid & Mary-Lee Rhodes & Marcus J. Collier & Francesco Pilla, 2021. "Innovating with Nature: From Nature-Based Solutions to Nature-Based Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Shuilin Liu & Xudong Lin & Xiaoli Huang & Hanyang Luo & Sumin Yu, 2023. "Research on Service-Driven Benign Market with Platform Subsidy Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Juying Zeng, 2018. "Fostering path of ecological sustainable entrepreneurship within big data network system," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 79-95, March.
    11. Matthias Filser & Sascha Kraus & Norat Roig-Tierno & Norbert Kailer & Ulrike Fischer, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as Catalyst for Sustainable Development: Opening the Black Box," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Patrick Gregori & Malgorzata A. Wdowiak & Erich J. Schwarz & Patrick Holzmann, 2019. "Exploring Value Creation in Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Insights from the Institutional Logics Perspective and the Business Model Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Marcus Wagner & Stefan Schaltegger & Erik G. Hansen & Klaus Fichter, 2021. "University-linked programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and regional development: how and with what impact?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1141-1158, February.
    14. Rakhshanda Khan, 2016. "How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Martin Gerner, 2019. "Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: corporate sustainability across cultures – towards a strategic framework implementation approach," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Neil A. Thompson, 2018. "Biofuels are (Not) the Future! Legitimation Strategies of Sustainable Ventures in Complex Institutional Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Violeta Radulescu, 2017. "Empirical Study on Sustainable Opportunities Recognition. A Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Joinery Industry Analysis Using Augmented Sustainable Development Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, September.
    18. Régis Y. Chenavaz & Alexandra Couston & Stéphanie Heichelbech & Isabelle Pignatel & Stanko Dimitrov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Nadia A. Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed & Bettina Lynda Bastian & Bronwyn P. Wood, 2022. "Women, Entrepreneurship, and Sustainability: The Case of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1141-1173, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.