IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A közös agrárpolitika 2013. évi közvetlen támogatási rendszerének hatásai a magyar mezőgazdaságra
[Impacts of the 2013 CAP direct-support system on Hungarian agriculture]

Author

Listed:
  • Mizik, Tamás

Abstract

Az agrárpolitika hatása meghatározó a mezőgazdasági szektor szempontjából, különösen így van ez az Európai Unió közös agrárpolitikájának (KAP) az esetében. Kiemelt fontosságúak a támogatások, illetve a lehívásukhoz szükséges előírások ismerete és teljesítése. A KAP reformjai között jelenleg a 2013-as az utolsó, amelynek során több új intézkedést is bevezettek. Ezek között - a hozzájuk rendelt források nagysága alapján - az alaptámogatás és a zöldítés volt a legjelentősebb. Mivel a támogatások a mezőgazdasági szektorban képződő jövedelem jelentős részét teszik ki, így a tanulmány alaphipotézise, hogy az érintett termelési egységek (egyéni gazdaságok, társas vállalkozások) gazdaságilag racionális válaszokat adtak a támogatási rendszer megváltozására. Ez a gyakorlatban azt jelenti, hogy megpróbáltak teljes mértékben alkalmazkodni a reform jelentette változásokhoz a támogatások maximalizálása érdekében.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: Q12, Q18.

Suggested Citation

  • Mizik, Tamás, 2019. "A közös agrárpolitika 2013. évi közvetlen támogatási rendszerének hatásai a magyar mezőgazdaságra [Impacts of the 2013 CAP direct-support system on Hungarian agriculture]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1210-1229.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1874
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2019.11.1210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1874
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2019.11.1210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kengyel, Ákos, 2019. "Az Európai Unió költségvetésének jövője a 2021-2027-es többéves pénzügyi keret tükrében [The future of the EU budget in the light of the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 521-550.
    2. Matthews, Alan, 2013. "Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Mizik, Tamás, 2019. "A Közös Agrárpolitika üzemszintű hatásai magyar szemszögből," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 63(01), February.
    4. Szerletics, Akos, 2018. "The Political Economy of Degressivity and Capping: New evidence from Hungary," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271977, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Jack Peerlings & Nico Polman & Liesbeth Dries, 2014. "Self-reported Resilience of European Farms With and Without the CAP," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 722-738, September.
    6. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Stefan Tangermann & Alan Matthews & Davide Viaggi & Christophe Crombez & Louise Knops & Johan Swinnen, 2012. "The Common Agricultural Policy after 2013," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 47(6), pages 316-342, November.
    7. Szerletics, Ákos, 2018. "Degressivity, capping and European farm structure: New evidence from Hungary," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(2), August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnė Žičkienė & Rasa Melnikienė & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Artiom Volkov, 2022. "CAP Direct Payments and Economic Resilience of Agriculture: Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Bertoni, Danilo & Aletti, Giacomo & Ferrandi, Giulia & Micheletti, Alessandra & Cavicchioli, Daniele & Pretolani, Roberto, 2018. "Farmland Use Transitions After the CAP Greening: a Preliminary Analysis Using Markov Chains Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 789-800.
    3. Viaggi, Davide & Raggi, Meri & Puddu, Marco & Bartolini, Fabio, 2013. "Farm/Household-level Simulation Results of Testing Policy and Other Scenarios," Working papers 157113, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    4. Tamás MIZIK & Anita KOLNHOFER-DERECSKEI, 2020. "Are We Ready For The New Challenges? The Case Of The Hungarian Agriculture," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 113-123.
    5. Balezentis, Tomas & Ribasauskiene, Erika & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Volkov, Artiom & Streimikiene, Dalia & Toma, Pierluigi, 2020. "Young farmers’ support under the Common Agricultural Policy and sustainability of rural regions: Evidence from Lithuania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Solazzo, Roberto & Pierangeli, Fabio, 2016. "How does greening affect farm behaviour? Trade-off between commitments and sanctions in the Northern Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 88-98.
    7. Puddu,Marco & Bartolini, Fabio & Viaggi,Davide, 2012. "Simulation of Land Use and Investment Behaviour under Different Policy Scenarios: Results of the extended farm/household model," Factor Markets Working Papers 132, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    8. Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Schulz, Norbert & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2014. "Assessing Farmers' Willingness to Accept "Greening": Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Gremany," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170560, Agricultural Economics Society.
    9. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Vanni, Francesco & Cardillo, Concetta, 2013. "The effects of CAP greening on Italian agriculture," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2013(3), September.
    11. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    12. Louhichi, Kamel & Ciaian, Pavel & Espinosa, Maria & Colen, Liesbeth & Perni, Angel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2015. "EU-wide individual Farm Model for CAP Analysis (IFM-CAP): Application to Crop Diversification Policy," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212155, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Gebeltova, Zdenka & Pletichova, D., 2012. "Proposal of the Creation of Resources for the Maintenance of the Production Capability of the Agricultural Land Fund by Way of Tax Savings," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4 Special), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Wrzaszcz, Wioletta, 2018. "Effectiveness of Greening in Poland," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(2), August.
    15. Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2016. "Territorial Unbalances in Quality of Life. A focus on Italian Inner and Rural Areas," Department of Economics 0087, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    16. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    17. Lefebvre, Marianne & Raggi, Meri & Gomez Y Paloma, Sergio & Viaggi, Davide, 2014. "An analysis of the intention-realisation discrepancy in EU farmers’ land investment decisions," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(1).
    18. Romano, B. & Zullo, F. & Fiorini, L. & Marucci, A., 2021. "“The park effect”? An assessment test of the territorial impacts of Italian National Parks, thirty years after the framework legislation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Viviane Gravey, 2019. "Finally Free to Green Agriculture Policy? UK post‐Brexit Policy Developments in the Shadow of the CAP and Devolution," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 11-16, August.
    20. Stępień Sebastian & Czyżewski Andrzej, 2019. "Quo vadis Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union?," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 295-309, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.