IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság
[Urban mobility, public goods and sustainability]

Author

Listed:
  • Fleischer, Tamás

Abstract

A közlekedés új technológiai lehetőségeinek felhasználásán túl a szabályozási módszerek fejlesztésében és a társadalmi elvárások befolyásolásában rejlő tartalékok mozgósítása is nélkülözhetetlen a fenntartható városi közlekedés megteremtéséhez. A tanulmányban a városi közterületek közjószág-tulajdonságait tekintjük át, ahol két kritérium - a kizárás és az akadályoztatás - alapján négy tartományt különítünk el: magánjavakat, tiszta közjavakat, véges készlettel rendelkező közös javakat és feltételes hozzáférésű (vagy klub-) javakat. Ha az akadályoztatási kritériumot a használatsűrűséggel arányos, folytonos skálaként kezeljük, megkülönböztethetjük az eltartó képességi határt kijelölő pontot (a hosszú távon fenntartható működés határa), valamint a hozammaximumot kijelölő pontot. E modell tárgyalási keretül szolgál a fenntarthatatlan városi közterület-használat fenntartható irányba tereléséhez, azaz értékelni tudjuk az igények befolyásolási módszereit vagy az eltartóképesség növelésére irányuló lehetőségeket. A zárórész áttekinti, hogy napjaink legtöbbet tárgyalt közlekedéstechnológiai újdonságai - nevezetesen az elektromos és az önvezető jármű - milyen feltételekkel kapcsolódnak a kívánatos szakpolitikai intézkedésekhez. Az elvárt fenntarthatósági előnyöket csak szervezett, integrált városi közlekedési rendszer keretébe beleillesztett szolgáltatás képes biztosítani.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: H4, H41, R4.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleischer, Tamás, 2019. "Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság [Urban mobility, public goods and sustainability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1056-1072.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1868
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2019.10.1056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1868
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2019.10.1056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itf, 2016. "Shared Mobility: Innovation for Liveable Cities," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 21, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. KOVÁCS Edit Veronika & HARANGI-RÁKOS Mónika, 2020. "Cities Vs The Countryside €“ Pros And Cons Of Urban And Rural Life," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 530-539, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manon Feys & Evy Rombaut & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke, 2020. "Experience and Acceptance of Autonomous Shuttles in the Brussels Capital Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1733-1765, August.
    3. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 0. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    4. Lazarus, Jessica R. & Caicedo, Juan D. & Bayen, Alexandre M. & Shaheen, Susan A., 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? Understanding opportunities, challenges, and equity considerations to expanding the market for pooling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 199-222.
    5. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Lazarus, Jessica & Caicedo, Juan & Bayen, Alexandre PhD, 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? Understanding the Time and Price Tradeoffs of OnDemand Ride Users – Opportunities, Challenges, and Social Equity Considerations for Policies to Promote Shared-Ride Services," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt44q6n0mm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Yves Crozet & Georgina Santos & Jean Coldefy, 2019. "Shared mobility and MaaS: Regulatory challenges of urban mobility," Working Papers halshs-03169805, HAL.
    7. Laetitia Dablanc & Eléonora Morganti & Niklas Arvidsson & Johan Woxenius & Michael Browne & Neila Saidi, 2017. "The Rise of On-Demand 'Instant Deliveries' in European Cities," Post-Print hal-01589316, HAL.
    8. Richard Lutz & Christian Böttger & Alexander Kirchner & Günter Knieps, 2019. "Deutsche Bahn zwischen Daseinsvorsorge und Gewinn: Ist ein radikaler Umbau nötig?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(05), pages 03-16, March.
    9. David P. Ashmore & Roselle Thoreau & Corina Kwami & Nicola Christie & Nicholas A. Tyler, 2020. "Using thematic analysis to explore symbolism in transport choice across national cultures," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 607-640, April.
    10. Yves Crozet & Jean Coldefy, 2021. "Mobility as a Service (MaaS): a digital roadmap for public transport authorities," Working Papers halshs-03169744, HAL.
    11. Lucken, Emma & Trapenberg Frick, Karen & Shaheen, Susan, 2019. "“Three Ps in a MOD:” Role for mobility on demand (MOD) public-private partnerships in public transit provision," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2k2550ct, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. David Ennnen & Thorsten Heilker, 2020. "Ride-Hailing Services in Germany: Potential Impacts on Public Transport, Motorized Traffic, and Social Welfare," Working Papers 29, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    13. Günter Knieps & Thomas Griese & André Grüttner & Oliver Rottmann & Hans-Wilhelm Schiffer & Gernot Sieg & David Stadelmann & Heiner Monheim, 2018. "Fahrverbote, City-Maut, kostenloser öffentlicher Nahverkehr: Wege aus dem Verkehrskollaps?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(09), pages 03-22, May.
    14. Alexandra König & Tabea Bonus & Jan Grippenkoven, 2018. "Analyzing Urban Residents’ Appraisal of Ridepooling Service Attributes with Conjoint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Akimoto, Keigo & Sano, Fuminori & Oda, Junichiro, 2022. "Impacts of ride and car-sharing associated with fully autonomous cars on global energy consumptions and carbon dioxide emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo, 2020. "Power-to-hydrogen as seasonal energy storage: an uncertainty analysis for optimal design of low-carbon multi-energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    17. Laura Gebhardt & Mascha Brost & Alexandra König, 2019. "An Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approach to Developing and Testing a New Sustainable Mobility System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.