IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v51y2024i4d10.1007_s11116-022-10364-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A flexible multiple discrete–continuous probit (MDCP) model: application to analysis of expenditure patterns of domestic tourists in India

Author

Listed:
  • Shobhit Saxena

    (Indian Institute of Science)

  • Abdul Rawoof Pinjari

    (Indian Institute of Science
    Indian Institute of Science (IISc))

  • Chandra R. Bhat

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

  • Aupal Mondal

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Traditional multiple discrete–continuous (MDC) choice models impose tight linkages between consumers’ discrete choice and the continuous consumption decisions due to the use of a single utility parameter driving both the decision to choose and the extent of choice. Recently, Bhat (Trans Res Part B Methodol 110:261–279, 2018) proposed a flexible MDCEV model that employs a utility function with separate parameters to determine the discrete choice and continuous consumption values. However, the flexible MDCEV model assumes an independent and identically distributed (IID) error structure across the discrete and continuous baseline utilities. In this paper, we formulate a flexible non-IID multiple discrete–continuous probit (MDCP) model that employs a multivariate normal stochastic distribution to allow for a more general variance–covariance structure. In doing so, we revisit Bhat (Trans Res Part B: Methodol 109: 238-256, 2018) flexible utility functional form and highlight that the stochastic conditions he used to derive the likelihood function are not always consistent with utility maximization. We offer an alternate interpretation of the model as representing a two-step decision-making process, where the consumers first decide which goods to choose and then decide the extent of allocation to each good. We demonstrate an application of the proposed flexible MDCP model to analyze households’ expenditure patterns on their domestic tourism trips in India. Our results indicate that, if the analyst is willing to compromise on the strict utility-maximizing aspect of behavior, while also enriching the behavioral dimension through the relaxation of the tie between the discrete and continuous consumption decisions, the preferred model would be the flexible non-IID MDCP model. On the other hand, if the analyst wants the model to be strictly grounded on utility-maximizing behavior (which may also have benefits by way of welfare measure computations), and is willing to assume a very tight tie between the discrete and continuous consumption decision processes, the preferred model would be the non-IID traditional MDCP model.

Suggested Citation

  • Shobhit Saxena & Abdul Rawoof Pinjari & Chandra R. Bhat & Aupal Mondal, 2024. "A flexible multiple discrete–continuous probit (MDCP) model: application to analysis of expenditure patterns of domestic tourists in India," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1299-1326, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-022-10364-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-022-10364-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-022-10364-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-022-10364-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Mubassira & Machemehl, Randy, 2017. "Analyzing tour chaining patterns of urban commercial vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 84-97.
    2. Hanemann, W Michael, 1984. "Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 541-561, May.
    3. Bhat, Chandra R., 2005. "A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 679-707, September.
    4. Saxena, Shobhit & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Multiple discrete-continuous choice models with additively separable utility functions and linear utility on outside good: Model properties and characterization of demand functions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 526-557.
    5. Igal Hendel, 1999. "Estimating Multiple-Discrete Choice Models: An Application to Computerization Returns," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(2), pages 423-446.
    6. Koichi Yonezawa & Timothy J. Richards, 2017. "Consumer Risk‐reduction Behavior and New Product Purchases," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(7), pages 1003-1016, October.
    7. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2011. "Generalized extreme value (GEV)-based error structures for multiple discrete-continuous choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 474-489, March.
    8. Chih-Wen Yang & Cheng-Lung (Richard) Wu & Jin-Long Lu, 2021. "Exploring the interdependency and determinants of tourism participation, expenditure, and duration: An analysis of Taiwanese citizens traveling abroad," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 649-669, June.
    9. von Haefen, Roger H. & Phaneuf, Daniel J., 2003. "Estimating preferences for outdoor recreation:: a comparison of continuous and count data demand system frameworks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 612-630, May.
    10. Nader Asgary & Gilberto de los Santos & Vern Vincent & Victor Davila, 1997. "The Determinants of Expenditures by Mexican Visitors to the Border Cities of Texas," Tourism Economics, , vol. 3(4), pages 319-328, December.
    11. Pollak, Robert A & Wales, Terence J, 1992. "Price-Augmenting Returns to Scale: An Application to Nonseparable Two-Stage Technologies," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(2), pages 213-220, May.
    12. Sobhani, Anae & Eluru, Naveen & Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza, 2013. "A latent segmentation based multiple discrete continuous extreme value model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 154-169.
    13. Andrea Pellegrini & Igor Sarman & Rico Maggi, 2021. "Understanding tourists’ expenditure patterns: a stochastic frontier approach within the framework of multiple discrete–continuous choices," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 931-951, April.
    14. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 2018. "A new flexible multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 261-279.
    2. Castro, Marisol & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pendyala, Ram M. & Jara-Díaz, Sergio R., 2012. "Accommodating multiple constraints in the multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 729-743.
    3. Bhat, Chandra R. & Mondal, Aupal & Asmussen, Katherine E. & Bhat, Aarti C., 2020. "A multiple discrete extreme value choice model with grouped consumption data and unobserved budgets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-222.
    4. Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "A new closed-form two-stage budgeting-based multiple discrete-continuous model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 162-192.
    5. Kidokoro, Yukihiro, 2016. "A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 54-72.
    6. Richards, Timothy J. & Gómez, Miguel I. & Pofahl, Geoffrey, 2012. "A Multiple-discrete/Continuous Model of Price Promotion," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 206-225.
    7. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.
    8. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra, 2021. "Computationally efficient forecasting procedures for Kuhn-Tucker consumer demand model systems: Application to residential energy consumption analysis," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Hanemann, Michael & Labandeira, Xavier & Labeaga, José M. & Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe, 2024. "Discrete-continuous models of residential energy demand: A comprehensive review," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "A closed-form multiple discrete-count extreme value (MDCNTEV) model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 65-86.
    11. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & de Jong, Gerard & Larranaga, Ana M. & Bettella Cybis, Helena B., 2020. "Application of MDCEV to infrastructure planning in regional freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 255-271.
    12. Bonnet, Céline & Richards, Timothy J., 2016. "Models of Consumer Demand for Differentiated Products," TSE Working Papers 16-741, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    13. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Augustin, Bertho & Sivaraman, Vijayaraghavan & Faghih Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen & Pendyala, Ram M., 2016. "Stochastic frontier estimation of budgets for Kuhn–Tucker demand systems: Application to activity time-use analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 117-133.
    14. Yukihiro Kidokoro, 2015. "Discrete choice models for multicategory goods," GRIPS Discussion Papers 15-08, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    15. Palma, David & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Extending the Multiple Discrete Continuous (MDC) modelling framework to consider complementarity, substitution, and an unobserved budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 13-35.
    16. Abdul Pinjari & Chandra Bhat & David S. Bunch, 2013. "Workshop report: recent advances on modeling multiple discrete-continuous choices," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Choice Modelling, chapter 3, pages 73-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Sobhani, Anae & Eluru, Naveen & Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza, 2013. "A latent segmentation based multiple discrete continuous extreme value model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 154-169.
    18. Saxena, Shobhit & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Multiple discrete-continuous choice models with additively separable utility functions and linear utility on outside good: Model properties and characterization of demand functions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 526-557.
    19. Kuriyama, Koichi & Shoji, Yasushi & Tsuge, Takahiro, 2020. "The value of leisure time of weekends and long holidays: The multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) choice model with triple constraints," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    20. Kim, Chul & Smith, Adam N. & Kim, Jaehwan & Allenby, Greg M., 2023. "Outside good utility and substitution patterns in direct utility models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-022-10364-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.