IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v47y1985i3p491-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tocqueville and public choice

Author

Listed:
  • L. Wade

Abstract

It is a remarkable fact that the first great exploration of mass democracy proceeded from a method so congenial to modern public choice. It is also a fact from which members of that school may take not only considerable satisfaction but valuable instruction as they seek to integrate their scholarly interests and impressive analytic skills with a compelling philosophical perspective. However profond his empirical work, Tocqueville's treatment of some topics is less thorough and rigorous than that found in selected contemporary studies. Economists, for example, would rightly observe that he, like Smith, lacked the formal proofs of welfare economics and the techniques of marginal analysis (even while his intuitions into those modern schemes are almost invariably correct, and he was entirely aware of most aspects of strategic behavior dealt with today in public choice). But when one considers the comprehensive nature of his descriptive/analytic work, revealing critical associations of beliefs, rules and incentives among all major social realms, it can be said confidently that his general equilibrium analysis, including the sources of instability he identified, remains unsurpassed in the tradition in which he wrote. Still, it would be wrong to read Tocqueville primarily for reasons of technical enlightenment. His relevance for public choice is much greater: in providing for that field both a trenchant framework of positive theory and an abiding philosophical justification, he offers a unified model in which the undertakings proposed by Buchanan are given concrete expression. This brief exegesis, of course, identifies only a few of the manifold subjects raised in Tocqueville's demiurgic treatise that are of interest to public choice; his work addresses many other issues of equal and pressing relevance, including a piercing analysis of democracy under the new system of property rights he realized would emerge with industrialization, a matter that deserves its own extended discussion. In the 1930s there was, upon its centenary, a resurgence of scholarly interest in Democracy and its prophecies, and there was some dispute as to whether Tocqueville's more somber warnings had been, or were about to be, realized. Fifty years of additional experience have not been altogether comforting. Is it not now the case that governmental size, concentration and power have grown beyond recognition; that every want has its power base and political voice; and that acquiescent and demagogic politicans seek, in the end unsucccessfully, to accommodate every voter, place-hunter, and political association? If so, we may still agree that the denouement is not yet. The plot must still be clarified. Tocqueville's rational-choice analytics point to the eventual collapse of democracy and its uneasy partner, liberty, as mobilized but insatiable populations grow weary and impatient with unappeased wants. Economic inefficiency, while important, is not the greatest cost imposed by such tendencies. Liberty itself would be lost, and with it the individual's opportunity to develop freely his character and virtue. One cannot discount the tone of doubt on this score that runs through Democracy, but there is an important counterpoint. Tocqueville neither mourned an aristocracy grown decadent nor feared the democratic future; rather, he cautioned that history was choice — he detested nothing more than the materialistic determinism fashionable among the Ideologues of his day. He therefore believed that democracy, while irresistible in its attraction, could possibly, by responsible choice, be channeled, disciplined and made compatible with liberty if enlightened self-interests should triumph over unenlightened ones. Tocqueville's own life was lived in harmony with just that principle, which gave to it a noble irony. Whatever other aspects of human nature he may have emphasized in his empirical work, he was himself a disinterested seeker after liberty and justice. No doubt it was to pay homage to such rare qualities that Nassau William Senior made his long and melancholy trek in 1859 to Tocqueville's grave, upon which he laid a wreath of immortelles. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Suggested Citation

  • L. Wade, 1985. "Tocqueville and public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 491-508, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:47:y:1985:i:3:p:491-508
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00182150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00182150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00182150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Tullock, 1971. "The paradox of revolution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 89-99, September.
    2. Brennan,Geoffrey & Buchanan,James M., 2006. "The Power to Tax," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521027922, October.
    3. Alexander Groth & Robert Curry, 1975. "Individual system preference," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 11-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathan Berg & Jeong-Yoo Kim, 2016. "Harsh Norms And Screening For Loyalty," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 205-217, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manfred Tietzel & Marion Weber, 1994. "The Economics of the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall," Rationality and Society, , vol. 6(1), pages 58-78, January.
    2. Philip Jones, 2004. "‘All for One and One for All’: Transactions Cost and Collective Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 450-468, October.
    3. Kessing, Sebastian G. & Konrad, Kai A. & Kotsogiannis, Christos, 2006. "Federal tax autonomy and the limits of cooperation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 317-329, March.
    4. Dwight Lee, 1985. "Reverse revenue sharing: A modest proposal," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 279-289, January.
    5. Bryan Caplan & Edward Stringham, 2005. "Mises, bastiat, public opinion, and public choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 79-105.
    6. Camacho, Carmen & Hassan, Waleed, 2023. "The dynamics of revolution: Discrimination, social unrest and the optimal timing of revolution," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Francisco de Castro, 2006. "The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy in Spain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 913-924.
    8. Luis R. Martinez & Jonas Jessen & Guo Xu, 2023. "A Glimpse of Freedom: Allied Occupation and Political Resistance in East Germany," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-106, January.
    9. Cao, Chunfang & Li, Xiaoyang & Xia, Changyuan, 2021. "The complicit role of local government authorities in corporate bribery: Evidence from a tax collection reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    11. Georg Vanberg & Michael Brooks, 1996. "Reviews," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 63-71, March.
    12. D W Jones & C R Morrow-Jones, 1984. "Effects of Revenue Distribution and Income Distribution on the Impacts of Local Taxation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 2(2), pages 135-148, June.
    13. Kantorowicz, Jarosław & Köppl–Turyna, Monika, 2019. "Disentangling the fiscal effects of local constitutions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 63-87.
    14. Stephen Billings & Thomas Thibodeau, 2011. "Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 416-450, May.
    15. Jan Schnellenbach, 2023. "The concept of Ordnungspolitik: rule-based economic policymaking from the perspective of the Freiburg School," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 283-300, June.
    16. Thiess Buettner & Robert Schwager & Sebastian Hauptmeier, 2011. "Efficient Revenue Sharing and Upper-Level Governments: Theory and Application to Germany," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(4), pages 647-667, December.
    17. Jin, Jing & Zou, Heng-fu, 2002. "How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 270-293, September.
    18. Teresa Garcia-Milà & Therese J. McGuire, 2001. "Tax incentives and the city," Economics Working Papers 631, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2001.
    19. Benjamin Larin & Bernd Süssmuth, 2014. "Fiscal Autonomy and Fiscal Sustainability: Subnational Taxation and Public Indebtedness in Contemporary Spain," CESifo Working Paper Series 4726, CESifo.
    20. Köppl–Turyna, Monika & Pitlik, Hans, 2018. "Do equalization payments affect subnational borrowing? Evidence from regression discontinuity," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 84-108.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:47:y:1985:i:3:p:491-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.