IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v128y2006i3p357-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In memoriam: Otto “Toby” Davis, 1934–2006

Author

Listed:
  • Melvin Hinich
  • Michael Munger

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Melvin Hinich & Michael Munger, 2006. "In memoriam: Otto “Toby” Davis, 1934–2006," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 357-359, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:128:y:2006:i:3:p:357-359
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-9041-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11127-006-9041-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11127-006-9041-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Otto A. Davis & Denise Dipasquale, 1982. "Enterprise Zones: New Deal, Old Deal, or No Deal?," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 391-410, Fall.
    2. O. A. Davis & A. B. Whinston, 1967. "Piecemeal Policy in the Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 323-331.
    3. Davis, Otto A. & Dempster, M. A. H. & Wildavsky, Aaron, 1966. "A Theory of the Budgetary Process," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 529-547, September.
    4. R. G. Lipsey & Kelvin Lancaster, 1956. "The General Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 11-32.
    5. P. Bohm, 1967. "On the Theory of "Second Best"," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 301-314.
    6. Otto A. Davis & Andrew B. Whinston, 1965. "Welfare Economics and the Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 32(1), pages 1-14.
    7. Davis, Otto A. & Hinich, Melvin J. & Ordeshook, Peter C., 1970. "An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 426-448, June.
    8. Otto Davis & Melvin Hinich, 1968. "On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 59-72, September.
    9. Boardman, Anthony E. & Davis, Otto A. & Sanday, Peggy R., 1977. "A simultaneous equations model of the educational process," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 23-49, February.
    10. Davis, Otto A & DeGroot, Morris H & Hinich, Melvin J, 1972. "Social Preference Orderings and Majority Rule," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(1), pages 147-157, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Jackson, 2014. "Location, location, location: the Davis-Hinich model of electoral competition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 197-218, April.
    2. Roger L. Faith & Earl A. Thompson, 1979. "A Paradox in the Theory of Second Best," UCLA Economics Working Papers 156, UCLA Department of Economics.
    3. Richard Lipsey, 2007. "Reflections on the general theory of second best at its golden jubilee," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 14(4), pages 349-364, August.
    4. David Wiens, 2016. "Assessing ideal theories," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 15(2), pages 132-149, May.
    5. Tanner, Thomas Cole, 1994. "The spatial theory of elections: an analysis of voters' predictive dimensions and recovery of the underlying issue space," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000018174, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Tovey, Craig A., 2010. "The instability of instability of centered distributions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 53-73, January.
    7. Kenneth Koford, 1982. "Why so much stability? An optimistic view of the possibility of rational legislative decisionmaking," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 3-19, March.
    8. John P. Walsh, 1982. "On Deriving Pricing Rules in the Theory of Second Best," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(4), pages 499-509, October.
    9. Delucchi, Mark A. & Murphy, James J., 2008. "How large are tax subsidies to motor-vehicle users in the US?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 196-208, May.
    10. Norman Schofield, 1980. "Formal political theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 249-275, January.
    11. Krishna, Pravin & Panagariya, Arvind, 2000. "A unification of second best results in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-257, December.
    12. Joseph Kadane, 1972. "On division of the question," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 47-54, September.
    13. J. L. Wallis, 1984. "Piecemeal Optimization and Public Utility Pricing," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 52(3), pages 155-163, September.
    14. Michael Munger, 2005. "Nineteenth-century voting procedures in a twenty-first century world," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 115-133, July.
    15. Larry Samuelson, 1987. "A test of the revealed-preference phenomenon in congressional elections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 141-169, January.
    16. Wai Chiu Woo, 2017. "The Way We Teach Public Economics: A Rationalization Using the Theory of Third Best," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 229-248, May.
    17. Tovey, Craig A., 2010. "A critique of distributional analysis in the spatial model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 88-101, January.
    18. Mark M. Berger & Michael C. Munger & Richard F. Potthoff, 2000. "The Downsian Model Predicts Divergence," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(2), pages 228-240, April.
    19. Nicolas Astier, 2021. "Second‐best pricing for incomplete market segments: Application to electricity pricing," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(6), pages 1287-1311, December.
    20. V. W. Yorgason, 1976. "But Who Reviews the Reviewers? The Case of Eggs," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(3), pages 511-519, Summer.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:128:y:2006:i:3:p:357-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.