IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v34y1967i3p323-331..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piecemeal Policy in the Theory of Second Best

Author

Listed:
  • O. A. Davis
  • A. B. Whinston

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • O. A. Davis & A. B. Whinston, 1967. "Piecemeal Policy in the Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 323-331.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:34:y:1967:i:3:p:323-331.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2296681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Lipsey, 2007. "Reflections on the general theory of second best at its golden jubilee," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 14(4), pages 349-364, August.
    2. Buchholz, Wolfgang & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 1997. "Zeit(in)konsistente Steuerpolitik," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 115, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    3. Larsen, Morten Marott & Pilegaard, Ninette & Ommeren, Jos Van, 2008. "Congestion and residential moving behaviour," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 378-387, July.
    4. Melvin Hinich & Michael Munger, 2006. "In memoriam: Otto “Toby” Davis, 1934–2006," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 357-359, September.
    5. J. L. Wallis, 1984. "Piecemeal Optimization and Public Utility Pricing," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 52(3), pages 155-163, September.
    6. Roger L. Faith & Earl A. Thompson, 1979. "A Paradox in the Theory of Second Best," UCLA Economics Working Papers 156, UCLA Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:34:y:1967:i:3:p:323-331.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.