IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v2y1976i3p511-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

But Who Reviews the Reviewers? The Case of Eggs

Author

Listed:
  • V. W. Yorgason

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • V. W. Yorgason, 1976. "But Who Reviews the Reviewers? The Case of Eggs," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(3), pages 511-519, Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:2:y:1976:i:3:p:511-519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28197622%292%3A3%3C511%3ABWRTRT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bill R. Miller & Gene C. Masters, 1973. "A Short-Run Price Prediction Model for Eggs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(3), pages 484-489.
    2. R. G. Lipsey & Kelvin Lancaster, 1956. "The General Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 11-32.
    3. Otto A. Davis & Andrew B. Whinston, 1965. "Welfare Economics and the Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 32(1), pages 1-14.
    4. E. J. Mishan, 1962. "Second Thoughts On Second Best," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 205-217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Wiens, 2016. "Assessing ideal theories," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 15(2), pages 132-149, May.
    2. John P. Walsh, 1982. "On Deriving Pricing Rules in the Theory of Second Best," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(4), pages 499-509, October.
    3. Melvin Hinich & Michael Munger, 2006. "In memoriam: Otto “Toby” Davis, 1934–2006," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 357-359, September.
    4. Delucchi, Mark A. & Murphy, James J., 2008. "How large are tax subsidies to motor-vehicle users in the US?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 196-208, May.
    5. Krishna, Pravin & Panagariya, Arvind, 2000. "A unification of second best results in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-257, December.
    6. Ruth F.G. William s & D.P. Doessel, 2016. "Reallocating Australia's Scarce Mental Health Resources," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 47-72.
    7. Roger L. Faith & Earl A. Thompson, 1979. "A Paradox in the Theory of Second Best," UCLA Economics Working Papers 156, UCLA Department of Economics.
    8. Wai Chiu Woo, 2017. "The Way We Teach Public Economics: A Rationalization Using the Theory of Third Best," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 229-248, May.
    9. Erich Streissler & Werner Neudeck, 1986. "Are there intellectual precursors to the idea of second best optimization?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 227-242, December.
    10. Emmanuel Petrakis & Panagiotis Skartados, 2022. "Vertical Opportunism, Bargaining, and Share-Based Agreements," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(4), pages 549-565, June.
    11. Jonathan M. Lee, 2015. "The Impact of Heterogeneous NOx Regulations on Distributed Electricity Generation in U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 15-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    12. Sergio Turner, 2004. "Pareto Improving Taxation in Incomplete Markets," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 310, Econometric Society.
    13. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    14. Kala Krishna & Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay & Cemile Yavas, 2005. "Trade with Labor Market Distortions and Heterogeneous Labor: Why Trade Can Hurt," Contributions to Economics, in: Günter S. Heiduk & Kar-yiu Wong (ed.), WTO and World Trade, pages 65-83, Springer.
    15. Richter, Wolfram F., 2009. "Taxing education in Ramsey's tradition," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(11-12), pages 1254-1260, December.
    16. Hakim Hammadou & Claire Papaix, 2015. "Policy packages for modal shift and CO2 reduction in Lille, France," Working Papers 1501, Chaire Economie du climat.
    17. Michael Bates & Michael Dinerstein & Andrew C. Johnston & Isaac Sorkin, 2022. "Teacher Labor Market Equilibrium and Student Achievement," CESifo Working Paper Series 9551, CESifo.
    18. Sanz Labrador, Ismael & Sanz-Sanz, José Félix, 2013. "Política fiscal y crecimiento económico: consideraciones microeconómicas y relaciones macroeconómicas," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 5367, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Juan Carlos De Pablo, 2001. "Ideas, intereses y valores," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 196, Universidad del CEMA.
    20. Eduardo Dávila & Ansgar Walther, 2021. "Corrective Regulation with Imperfect Instruments," NBER Working Papers 29160, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:2:y:1976:i:3:p:511-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.