IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v18y2018i4d10.1007_s11115-017-0392-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Uses of Outcomes Measures Under Austerity: the Case of Danish Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Moll Ghin

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

This article argues that the use of performance information may change according to economic circumstances. In a fiscal crisis, policy-makers likely demand less documentation of service quality, but under longer-term term austerity they can use performance information, including outcomes measures, to target and reallocate scarce resources across organizational boundaries. The argument is tested in an analysis of six Danish municipalities after the financial crisis. In these cases, performance information was used in new ways. For instance, outcomes measures were linked to overall strategies and used in the budgeting process to promote the reallocation of resources towards more effective services.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Moll Ghin, 2018. "New Uses of Outcomes Measures Under Austerity: the Case of Danish Municipalities," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 543-560, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-017-0392-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-017-0392-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-017-0392-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-017-0392-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmine Bianchi & Salvatore Tomaselli, 2015. "A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 370-385, October.
    2. Ivanyna, Maksym & Shah, Anwar, 2014. "How close is your government to its people? Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-61.
    3. Christopher Pollitt, 2010. "Cuts and reforms — Public services as we move into a new era," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 32(1), pages 17-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis Pepple & Kehinde Olowookere, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of the Dynamics of Work and Employment Relations during Austerity," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 281-297, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wajdi Abushabab & Reza Abdi, 2017. "Strategic Management Practices: An Investigation of Public Sector Organizations in the Kingdom of Bahrain," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 9(3), pages 47-60.
    2. Kumba Digdowiseiso, 2022. "Is Fiscal Decentralization Growth Enhancing? A Cross-Country Study in Developing Countries over the Period 1990–2014," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Muhammad Shahid & Rukhsana Kalim, 2020. "Decentralized Tax Revenue, Institutional Complementarity and Economic Growth: A Time Series Analysis of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 25-33.
    4. Li, Lei & Luo, Changtuo, 2023. "Does administrative decentralization promote outward foreign direct investment and productivity? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Laurence Ferry & Peter Eckersley, 2015. "Budgeting and governing for deficit reduction in the UK public sector: act three 'accountability and audit arrangements'," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 203-210, May.
    6. Lorenzo Bordogna & Stefano Neri, 2014. "Austerity policies, social dialogue and public services in Italian local government," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 357-371, August.
    7. Feld, Lars P. & Frey, Christian & Schaltegger, Christoph A. & Schmid, Lukas A., 2021. "Fiscal federalism and income inequality: An empirical analysis for Switzerland," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 463-494.
    8. Anwar Shah, 2014. "Decentralized Provision of Public Infrastructure and Corruption," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1418, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    9. Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2023. "Governance as an Interplay between Corruption and Polity: Conceptualizing from a National Perspective," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    11. Patricia Popelier, 2017. "Federalism Disputes and the Behavior of Courts: Explaining Variation in Federal Courts’ Support for Centralization," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(1), pages 27-48.
    12. Akalbeo, Benard & Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge & Yedgenov, Bauyrzhan, 2023. "Fiscal decentralization and structural versus cyclical unemployment levels," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Konstantinos Siassiakos & Georgios A. Papadopoulos & Evripidis P. Kechagias & Marina Kafasi, 2020. "The role and the perceived impact of fiscal audits, conducted by the Hellenic Court of Audit (HCA), towards the effectiveness and efficiency of Greek Public Organizations," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-7.
    14. David Bartolini & Agnese Sacchi & Domenico Scalera & Alberto Zazzaro, 2018. "The closer the better? Institutional distance and information blurring in a political agency model," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 146, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    15. Yener Altunbaş & John Thornton, 2017. "Why Do Countries Adopt Fiscal Rules?," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 85(1), pages 65-87, January.
    16. Pulejo, Massimo & Querubín, Pablo, 2021. "Electoral concerns reduce restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена), 2018. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Delegated Powers [Оценка Результативности И Эффективности Переданных Полномочий]," Working Papers 041839, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    18. Mark Davidson & Kevin Ward, 2022. "Post-great recession municipal budgeting and governance: A mixed methods analysis of budget stress and reform," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 634-652, June.
    19. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Agnese Sacchi, 2017. "The Impact Of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1095-1129, September.
    20. Andreas P Kyriacou & Oriol Roca-Sagalés, 2024. "Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Access and Quality: Evidence from Local Governments around the World," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(2), pages 313-338.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-017-0392-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.