IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v16y2016i4d10.1007_s11115-015-0325-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gatekeepers: How Procurement Personnel Guard Against Hybrid Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel E. Bromberg

    (University of New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire)

Abstract

Though much attention has been given to the relationship between contractor and vendor in regard to governmental accountability, little attention has been paid to the internal struggles that surface in regard to accountability in the procurement process. These informal horizontal relationships often circumvent vertical accountability controls most often thought to ensure equitable vendor selection. Similarly, though much attention has been paid to political influence in contracting, hierarchal organizational structures, and measures of performance, the contract officer-program manager relation has not been explored. Specifically, the informal tension that often forms between the program manager and contract officer has not been examined in regard to such accountability. This paper examines the relationship between the program officer and the contract officer in order to describe how hybrid public administration can affect the contracting process.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel E. Bromberg, 2016. "Gatekeepers: How Procurement Personnel Guard Against Hybrid Accountability," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 549-560, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:16:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0325-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-015-0325-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-015-0325-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-015-0325-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Schillemans, 2008. "Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 175-194, June.
    2. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2011. "Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 407-423, December.
    3. Steve Kelman, 1990. "Procurement and Public Management," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 53122, September.
    4. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.
    5. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2015. "Performance and Accountability—A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 207-225, June.
    2. Mussari Riccardo & Sorrentino Daniela, 2017. "Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 137-153, July.
    3. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    4. Tom Christensen & Anne Fimreite & Per Lægreid, 2014. "Joined-Up Government for Welfare Administration Reform in Norway," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 439-456, December.
    5. Cristina M. Campos-Alba & Emilio J. De la Higuera-Molina & Gemma Pérez-López & José L. Zafra-Gómez, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Public and Private Delivery Forms: An Application to the Waste Collection Service Using Order-M Data Panel Frontier Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Ian Hodge & William M. Adams, 2016. "Short-Term Projects versus Adaptive Governance: Conflicting Demands in the Management of Ecological Restoration," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Ball, Amanda & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 283-293.
    8. Mario Nicoliello & Dennis Tracchia, 2014. "La misurazione della performance nel settore pubblico: il caso del trasporto pubblico locale," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 35-53.
    9. Linda Ponta & Francesco Delfino & Gian Carlo Cainarca, 2020. "The Role of Monetary Incentives: Bonus and/or Stimulus," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Richard Craven, 2023. "Managing dissonance: Bureaucratic justice and public procurement," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 215-233, January.
    11. Frączkiewicz-Wronka Aldona & Szymaniec Karolina, 2012. "Resource based view and resource dependence theory in decision making process of public organisation - research findings," Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 16-29, December.
    12. Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Luca Papi & Giorgia Gobbo & Riccardo Ievoli, 2021. "Qualit? e coerenza degli strumenti di programmazione e rendicontazione delle performance dei Ministeri," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 143-163.
    13. Guido Tatone, 2016. "L?influenza dell?enforcement contrattuale sulla qualit? della prestazione negli appalti pubblici: una rassegna teorica," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 107-129.
    14. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
    15. Abdullah, Aminah & Khadaroo, Iqbal & Napier, Christopher J., 2018. "Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 174-184.
    16. Robbins, Geraldine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2015. "From secrecy to transparency: Accounting and the transition from religious charity to publicly-owned hospital," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 19-32.
    17. Fazekas,Mihály & Blum,Jurgen Rene, 2021. "Improving Public Procurement Outcomes : Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9690, The World Bank.
    18. Dennis Jancsary & Renate E. Meyer & Markus A. Höllerer & Vitaliano Barberio, 2017. "Toward a Structural Model of Organizational-Level Institutional Pluralism and Logic Interconnectedness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1150-1167, December.
    19. Rosta, Miklós, 2013. "New Public Management: opportunity for the Centre, thread for the Periphery," MPRA Paper 68474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:16:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0325-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.