IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v41y2022i4d10.1007_s11113-022-09699-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childbearing Biographies as a Method to Examine Diversity and Clustering of Childbearing Experiences: A Research Brief

Author

Listed:
  • Mieke Beth Thomeer

    (The University of Alabama at Birmingham)

  • Rin Reczek

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Lawrence Stacey

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

Due to increasing heterogeneity in if, when, and under what conditions women have children, the timing, spacing, and other demographic aspects of childbearing have drastically changed in the US over the past century. Existing science tends to examine demographic aspects of childbearing separately, creating an incomplete understanding of how childbearing patterns are distributed at the population level. In this research brief, we develop the concept of childbearing biographies to emphasize that multiple childbearing characteristics cluster together. We analyze nationally representative US data from the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79; N = 4052). Using eight childbearing variables (e.g., age at first birth, number of children, whether unmarried at any birth), we use Mixed-Mode Latent Class Analysis (MM-LCA) and identify five classes, or childbearing biographies: (1) early compressed childbearing, (2) staggered childbearing, (3) extended high-parity childbearing, (4) later childbearing, and (5) married planned childbearing. A childbearing biography approach highlights the increasingly heterogeneous contexts of parenthood today, showing how women with similar characteristics around one aspect of childbearing (e.g., early age at first birth) can also be highly divergent from each other when taking into consideration other childbearing characteristics. In showing this complexity, we highlight that a childbearing biography approach has the potential to shed new light on widening inequality among contemporary midlife women, with implications for aging and population health and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Mieke Beth Thomeer & Rin Reczek & Lawrence Stacey, 2022. "Childbearing Biographies as a Method to Examine Diversity and Clustering of Childbearing Experiences: A Research Brief," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1405-1415, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09699-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09699-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-022-09699-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-022-09699-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Sten Hartnett & Rachel Margolis, 2019. "Births that are Later-than-Desired: Correlates and Consequences," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(4), pages 483-505, August.
    2. Emily Grundy & Sanna Read, 2015. "Pathways from fertility history to later life health: Results from analyses of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(4), pages 107-146.
    3. Katherine M. Johnson & Arthur L. Greil & Karina M. Shreffler & Julia McQuillan, 2018. "Fertility and Infertility: Toward an Integrative Research Agenda," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(5), pages 641-666, October.
    4. Mary Dupuis Sammel & Louise M. Ryan & Julie M. Legler, 1997. "Latent Variable Models for Mixed Discrete and Continuous Outcomes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 667-678.
    5. Zhang, Q. & Ip, E.H., 2014. "Variable assessment in latent class models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 146-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine M. Johnson & Karina M. Shreffler & Arthur L. Greil & Julia McQuillan, 2023. "Bearing the Reproductive Load? Unequal Reproductive Careers Among U.S. Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    2. Emilio Augusto Coelho-Barros & Jorge Alberto Achcar & Josmar Mazucheli, 2010. "Longitudinal Poisson modeling: an application for CD4 counting in HIV-infected patients," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 865-880.
    3. Chen Yuqi & Guo Wensheng & Kotanko Peter & Usvyat Len & Wang Yuedong, 2016. "Joint Model for Mortality and Hospitalization," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Zhang, Q. & Ip, E.H., 2014. "Variable assessment in latent class models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 146-156.
    5. Zhenzhen Zhang & Thomas M. Braun & Karen E. Peterson & Howard Hu & Martha M. Téllez-Rojo & Brisa N. Sánchez, 2018. "Extending Tests of Random Effects to Assess for Measurement Invariance in Factor Models," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(3), pages 634-650, December.
    6. Luo, Chongliang & Liang, Jian & Li, Gen & Wang, Fei & Zhang, Changshui & Dey, Dipak K. & Chen, Kun, 2018. "Leveraging mixed and incomplete outcomes via reduced-rank modeling," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 378-394.
    7. Leila Amiri & Mojtaba Khazaei & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2018. "A mixture latent variable model for modeling mixed data in heterogeneous populations and its applications," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(1), pages 95-115, January.
    8. Zhang, Xiao & Boscardin, W. John & Belin, Thomas R. & Wan, Xiaohai & He, Yulei & Zhang, Kui, 2015. "A Bayesian method for analyzing combinations of continuous, ordinal, and nominal categorical data with missing values," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 43-58.
    9. Samson B. Adebayo & Ludwig Fahrmeir & Christian Seiler & Christian Heumann, 2011. "Geoadditive Latent Variable Modeling of Count Data on Multiple Sexual Partnering in Nigeria," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 620-628, June.
    10. Hoshino, Takahiro, 2008. "A Bayesian propensity score adjustment for latent variable modeling and MCMC algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1413-1429, January.
    11. Nussbaum, Frank & Giesen, Joachim, 2020. "Pairwise sparse + low-rank models for variables of mixed type," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Jane Osburn, 2011. "A Latent Variable Approach to Examining the Effects of HR Policies on the Inter- and Intra-Establishment Wage and Employment Structure: A Study of Two Precision Manufacturing Industries," Working Papers 451, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    13. Viola Angelini & Jochen Mierau, 2018. "Late-life health effects of teenage motherhood," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(41), pages 1081-1104.
    14. Barclay, Kieron & Keenan, Katherine & Grundy, Emily & Kolk, Martin & Myrskylä, Mikko, 2016. "Reproductive history and post-reproductive mortality: A sibling comparison analysis using Swedish register data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 82-92.
    15. Poh Lin Tan & Jeremy Lim-Soh, 2023. "Access to Ovulation Tests and Strategic Timing of Intercourse in a Low Fertility Context," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Michael S. Rendall & Eowna Young Harrison & Mónica L. Caudillo, 2020. "Intentionally or Ambivalently Risking a Short Interpregnancy Interval: Reproductive-Readiness Factors in Women’s Postpartum Non-Use of Contraception," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 821-841, June.
    17. D. J. Bartholomew, 2002. "Discussion on the paper by Fayers and Hand," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(2), pages 253-261, June.
    18. Takahiro Hoshino & Hiroshi Kurata & Kazuo Shigemasu, 2006. "A Propensity Score Adjustment for Multiple Group Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 691-712, December.
    19. Rebecca E Lacey & Meena Kumari & Amanda Sacker & Mai Stafford & Diana Kuh & Anne McMunn, 2016. "Work-Family Life Courses and Metabolic Markers in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Jun Zhu & Jens C. Eickhoff & Mark S. Kaiser, 2003. "Modeling the Dependence between Number of Trials and Success Probability in Beta-Binomial–Poisson Mixture Distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 955-961, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09699-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.