IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v38y2019i4d10.1007_s11113-019-09513-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Births that are Later-than-Desired: Correlates and Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Sten Hartnett

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Rachel Margolis

    (University of Western Ontario)

Abstract

Prior literature examining women’s evaluations of pregnancy timing has focused on pregnancies that are mistimed (i.e. earlier-than-desired) and unwanted (i.e. not wanted at any time), and has not addressed pregnancies that arrive later-than-desired. However, fertility postponement is widespread, so pregnancies that arrive later-than-desired may be common in the U.S. Using data from the 1995–2015 National Survey of Family Growth (N = 15,065), we investigate the prevalence and characteristics of later-than-desired pregnancies that end in birth. We find that nearly 10% of births are categorized as later-than-desired and these babies are more likely to be low birth weight, compared to on-time births (controlling for sociodemographic characteristics). Further, having a later-than-desired birth positively predicts that the next birth will be mistimed, rather than being on-time. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of pathways that can lead to mistimed births. Future research should explore the pairing of later-than-desired-births followed by mistimed births to identify mechanisms and evaluate how these births may differ from other mistimed births. We conclude that later-than-desired births warrant further study considering the elevated risk of low birth weight and the current progression of fertility postponement in the U.S. Further, we argue that future research on evaluations of birth timing should be expanded beyond mistimed and unwanted births to include later-than-desired births, due to their conceptual commonalities and their ties to poorer health indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Sten Hartnett & Rachel Margolis, 2019. "Births that are Later-than-Desired: Correlates and Consequences," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(4), pages 483-505, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:38:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09513-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-019-09513-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-019-09513-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-019-09513-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elina Lampi, 2011. "What do friends and the media tell us? How different information channels affect women's risk perceptions of age-related female infertility," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 365-380, March.
    2. Heather Gatny & Yasamin Kusunoki & Jennifer Barber, 2014. "Pregnancy scares and subsequent unintended pregnancy," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(40), pages 1229-1242.
    3. Katherine M. Johnson & Arthur L. Greil & Karina M. Shreffler & Julia McQuillan, 2018. "Fertility and Infertility: Toward an Integrative Research Agenda," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(5), pages 641-666, October.
    4. Najman, J. M. & Morrison, J. & Williams, G. & Andersen, M. & Keeping, J. D., 1991. "The mental health of women 6 months after they give birth to an unwanted baby: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 241-247, January.
    5. Karen Guzzo & Sarah Hayford, 2011. "Fertility Following an Unintended First Birth," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(4), pages 1493-1516, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poh Lin Tan & Jeremy Lim-Soh, 2023. "Access to Ovulation Tests and Strategic Timing of Intercourse in a Low Fertility Context," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Michael S. Rendall & Eowna Young Harrison & Mónica L. Caudillo, 2020. "Intentionally or Ambivalently Risking a Short Interpregnancy Interval: Reproductive-Readiness Factors in Women’s Postpartum Non-Use of Contraception," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 821-841, June.
    3. Mieke Beth Thomeer & Rin Reczek & Lawrence Stacey, 2022. "Childbearing Biographies as a Method to Examine Diversity and Clustering of Childbearing Experiences: A Research Brief," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1405-1415, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Pirani & Daniele Vignoli, 2021. "Childbearing Across Partnerships in Italy: Prevalence, Demographic Correlates, Social Gradient," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2021_15, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    2. Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2014. "New Partners, More Kids," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 654(1), pages 66-86, July.
    3. Jennifer Van Hook & Claire Altman, 2013. "Using Discrete-Time Event History Fertility Models to Simulate Total Fertility Rates and Other Fertility Measures," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(4), pages 585-610, August.
    4. Fumiya Uchikoshi & Ryohei Mogi, 2018. "Order matters: The effect of premarital pregnancy on second childbearing in Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(48), pages 1305-1330.
    5. Mieke Beth Thomeer & Rin Reczek & Lawrence Stacey, 2022. "Childbearing Biographies as a Method to Examine Diversity and Clustering of Childbearing Experiences: A Research Brief," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1405-1415, August.
    6. Bayer, Ya'akov M. & Ruffle, Bradley J. & Shtudiner, Zeev & Zultan, Ro'i, 2018. "Costly superstitious beliefs: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 30-43.
    7. Jessica Houston Su & Fenaba R. Addo, 2018. "Born Without a Silver Spoon: Race, Wealth, and Unintended Childbearing," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 600-615, December.
    8. Katherine M. Johnson & Karina M. Shreffler & Arthur L. Greil & Julia McQuillan, 2023. "Bearing the Reproductive Load? Unequal Reproductive Careers Among U.S. Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Sylvain Dessy & Francesca Marchetta & Roland Pongou & Luca Tiberti, 2024. "Women’s Relative Earning Power and Fertility: Evidence from Climate Shocks in Rural Madagascar," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_14.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    10. Jennifer Barber & Patricia East, 2011. "Children’s Experiences After the Unintended Birth of a Sibling," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(1), pages 101-125, February.
    11. Sowmya Rajan & S. Philip Morgan & Kathleen Mullan Harris & David Guilkey & Sarah R. Hayford & Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2017. "Trajectories of Unintended Fertility," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(6), pages 903-928, December.
    12. Margaret Gough, 2017. "Birth spacing, human capital, and the motherhood penalty at midlife in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(13), pages 363-416.
    13. Bridget Brew & Abigail Weitzman & Kelly Musick & Yasamin Kusunoki, 2020. "Young women's joint relationship, sex, and contraceptive trajectories: Evidence from the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(34), pages 933-984.
    14. Bornstein, Marta & Gipson, Jessica D. & Failing, Gates & Banda, Venson & Norris, Alison, 2020. "Individual and community-level impact of infertility-related stigma in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut, 2022. "Can LARC Fulfill Its Potential to Reduce U.S. Women’s Unintended Pregnancy Risk? Examining Women’s Contraception and Childbearing in the Year Before Initiating LARC," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 789-799, June.
    16. Rachel M. Shattuck, 2017. "Does It Matter What She Wants? The Role of Individual Preferences Against Unmarried Motherhood in Young Women’s Likelihood of a Nonmarital First Birth," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(4), pages 1451-1475, August.
    17. Anna Merklinger-Gruchala & Maria Kapiszewska, 2019. "The Effect of Prenatal Stress, Proxied by Marital and Paternity Status, on the Risk of Preterm Birth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Andrés F. Castro Torres & Emilio Parrado, 2022. "Nativity differentials in first births in the United States: Patterns by race and ethnicity," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(2), pages 37-64.
    19. Maximova, Katerina & Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie, 2009. "Mental health consequences of unintended childlessness and unplanned births: Gender differences and life course dynamics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 850-857, March.
    20. Ester Lazzari & Edith Gray & Bernard Baffour, 2022. "A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(1), pages 1-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:38:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09513-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.