IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v27y2008i6p639-665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Providing Spatial Data for Secondary Analysis: Issues and Current Practices Relating to Confidentiality

Author

Listed:
  • Myron Gutmann
  • Kristine Witkowski
  • Corey Colyer
  • JoAnne O’Rourke
  • James McNally

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Myron Gutmann & Kristine Witkowski & Corey Colyer & JoAnne O’Rourke & James McNally, 2008. "Providing Spatial Data for Secondary Analysis: Issues and Current Practices Relating to Confidentiality," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(6), pages 639-665, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:27:y:2008:i:6:p:639-665
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-008-9095-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11113-008-9095-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-008-9095-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Seltzer, 2005. "On the use of population data systems to target vulnerable population subgroups for human rights abuses," Coyuntura Social 12908, Fedesarrollo.
    2. Jerome P. Reiter, 2005. "Releasing multiply imputed, synthetic public use microdata: an illustration and empirical study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(1), pages 185-205, January.
    3. John M. Abowd & Julia I. Lane, 2004. "New Approaches to Confidentiality Protection Synthetic Data, Remote Access and Research Data Centers," Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical Papers 2004-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Duncan, George & Lambert, Diane, 1989. "The Risk of Disclosure for Microdata," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 7(2), pages 207-217, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Palmer & Thomas Espenshade & Frederic Bartumeus & Chang Chung & Necati Ozgencil & Kathleen Li, 2013. "New Approaches to Human Mobility: Using Mobile Phones for Demographic Research," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(3), pages 1105-1128, June.
    2. Geoffrey M. Jacquez & Aleksander Essex & Andrew Curtis & Betsy Kohler & Recinda Sherman & Khaled El Emam & Chen Shi & Andy Kaufmann & Linda Beale & Thomas Cusick & Daniel Goldberg & Pierre Goovaerts, 2017. "Geospatial cryptography: enabling researchers to access private, spatially referenced, human subjects data for cancer control and prevention," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 197-220, July.
    3. Haley, Danielle F. & Matthews, Stephen A. & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & Haardörfer, Regine & Adimora, Adaora A. & Wingood, Gina M. & Kramer, Michael R., 2016. "Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 49-56.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loong Bronwyn & Rubin Donald B., 2017. "Multiply-Imputed Synthetic Data: Advice to the Imputer," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 1005-1019, December.
    2. Klein Martin & Sinha Bimal, 2013. "Statistical Analysis of Noise-Multiplied Data Using Multiple Imputation," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 425-465, June.
    3. Natalie Shlomo & Chris Skinner, 2022. "Measuring risk of re‐identification in microdata: State‐of‐the art and new directions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1644-1662, October.
    4. Woodcock, Simon D. & Benedetto, Gary, 2009. "Distribution-preserving statistical disclosure limitation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4228-4242, October.
    5. Dong Hua & Meeden Glen, 2016. "Constructing Synthetic Samples," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 113-127, March.
    6. Martin Klein & Ricardo Moura & Bimal Sinha, 2021. "Multivariate Normal Inference based on Singly Imputed Synthetic Data under Plug-in Sampling," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 273-287, May.
    7. James Jackson & Robin Mitra & Brian Francis & Iain Dove, 2022. "Using saturated count models for user‐friendly synthesis of large confidential administrative databases," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1613-1643, October.
    8. Huang, Yunyou & Zhan, Jianfeng & Luo, Chunjie & Wang, Lei & Wang, Nana & Zheng, Daoyi & Fan, Fanda & Ren, Rui, 2019. "An electricity consumption model for synthesizing scalable electricity load curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 674-683.
    9. Joshua Snoke & Gillian M. Raab & Beata Nowok & Chris Dibben & Aleksandra Slavkovic, 2018. "General and specific utility measures for synthetic data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 663-688, June.
    10. Andrés F. Barrientos & Alexander Bolton & Tom Balmat & Jerome P. Reiter & John M. de Figueiredo & Ashwin Machanavajjhala & Yan Chen & Charles Kneifel & Mark DeLong, 2017. "A Framework for Sharing Confidential Research Data, Applied to Investigating Differential Pay by Race in the U. S. Government," NBER Working Papers 23534, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Yi Qian & Hui Xie, 2013. "Drive More Effective Data-Based Innovations: Enhancing the Utility of Secure Databases," NBER Working Papers 19586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Sonya Vartivarian & John L. Czajka & Michael Weber, "undated". "Measuring Disclosure Risk and an Examination of the Possibilities of Using Synthetic Data in the Individual Income Tax Return Public Use File," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ab85aed60a3e429786cfcbfdc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    13. John M. Abowd & Kaj Gittings & Kevin L. McKinney & Bryce E. Stephens & Lars Vilhuber & Simon Woodcock, 2012. "Dynamically Consistent Noise Infusion and Partially Synthetic Data as Confidentiality Protection Measures for Related Time Series," Working Papers 12-13, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    14. Joseph W. Sakshaug & Trivellore E. Raghunathan, 2014. "Generating synthetic data to produce public-use microdata for small geographic areas based on complex sample survey data with application to the National Health Interview Survey," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(10), pages 2103-2122, October.
    15. Reiter, Jerome P. & Drechsler, Jörg, 2007. "Releasing multiply-imputed synthetic data generated in two stages to protect confidentiality," IAB-Discussion Paper 200720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Christine M. O'Keefe & James O. Chipperfield, 2013. "A Summary of Attack Methods and Confidentiality Protection Measures for Fully Automated Remote Analysis Systems," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(3), pages 426-455, December.
    17. Skinner, Chris J., 2007. "The probability of identification: applying ideas from forensic statistics to disclosure risk assessment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39105, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Nowok, Beata & Raab, Gillian M. & Dibben, Chris, 2016. "synthpop: Bespoke Creation of Synthetic Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 74(i11).
    19. Harrison Quick & Scott H. Holan & Christopher K. Wikle, 2018. "Generating partially synthetic geocoded public use data with decreased disclosure risk by using differential smoothing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 649-661, June.
    20. Xiao-Bai Li & Sumit Sarkar, 2013. "Class-Restricted Clustering and Microperturbation for Data Privacy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 796-812, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:27:y:2008:i:6:p:639-665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.