IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v30y2019i2d10.1007_s11002-019-09490-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pareto rule in marketing revisited: is it 80/20 or 70/20?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel M. McCarthy

    (Emory University)

  • Russell S. Winer

    (New York University)

Abstract

In a recent paper, Kim, Singh, and Winer (Marketing Letters 491–507, 2017) studied the Pareto rule across 22 different CPG categories. The authors found an average Pareto ratio (PR) of .73, meaning that 73% of sales came from the top 20% of customers. In this paper, we use a unique dataset of 339 publicly traded non-CPG companies to see whether/when the Kim et al. result holds. We have additional data on these companies, including whether they are product or service companies, whether they sell to customers on a subscription or non-subscription basis, financial and industry information, and summaries of customer purchase behavior. We find that the overall average PR is .67 with product companies having a ratio of .67, and service companies .66. We find that non-subscription businesses have a PR of .68, substantially higher than that of subscription businesses at .59. We estimate the correlates of PR by industry and other factors. Preliminary results show much higher PRs for profits than sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel M. McCarthy & Russell S. Winer, 2019. "The Pareto rule in marketing revisited: is it 80/20 or 70/20?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 139-150, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-019-09490-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-019-09490-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-019-09490-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-019-09490-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baek Jung Kim & Vishal Singh & Russell S. Winer, 2017. "The Pareto rule for frequently purchased packaged goods: an empirical generalization," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 491-507, December.
    2. Sayan Chatterjee & Michael Lubatkin, 1990. "Corporate mergers, stockholder diversification, and changes in systematic risk," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 255-268, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giang Tue Trinh & John Dawes & Byron Sharp, 2024. "Where is the brand growth potential? An examination of buyer groups," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 95-106, March.
    2. Bombaij, Nick, 2021. "Effectiveness of loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM 095c506d-5b5c-4ea3-9b41-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Martin, James & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Dawes, John & Tanusondjaja, Arry & Cohen, Justin & McColl, Bruce & Trinh, Giang, 2020. "Fundamental basket size patterns and their relation to retailer performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Anesbury, Zachary William & Talbot, Danielle & Day, Chanel Andrea & Bogomolov, Tim & Bogomolova, Svetlana, 2020. "The fallacy of the heavy buyer: Exploring purchasing frequencies of fresh fruit and vegetable categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anesbury, Zachary William & Talbot, Danielle & Day, Chanel Andrea & Bogomolov, Tim & Bogomolova, Svetlana, 2020. "The fallacy of the heavy buyer: Exploring purchasing frequencies of fresh fruit and vegetable categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Khaleghikarahrodi, Mehrsa & Macht, Gretchen A., 2023. "Patterns, no patterns, that is the question: Quantifying users’ electric vehicle charging," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 291-304.
    3. João Carvalho Santos & Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Nuno Rosa Reis & Martinho Ribeiro Almeida, 2012. "Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals," Working Papers 91, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    4. Sayan Chatterjee & Jagdip Singh, 1999. "Are Tradeoffs Inherent in Diversification Moves? A Simultaneous Model for Type of Diversification and Mode of Expansion Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 25-41, January.
    5. John Ogwang & Dennis Obote & Ursula Abwot, 2021. "A Technical Note on New Applications of Lorenz Curves in Business Based on Pareto Principles," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 9(2), pages 76-81.
    6. Tzu-Ching Weng & Chieh-wen kuo Chem & Pei-Jung Lee, 2022. "The Influence Of Management Compensation On Diversification Strategy," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 16(1), pages 17-40.
    7. Joseph A. Clougherty & Tomaso Duso, 2010. "Using Rival Effects to Identify Synergies and Improve Merger Typologies," CIG Working Papers SP II 2010-13, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    8. Joseph A. Clougherty & Tomaso Duso, 2009. "The Impact of Horizontal Mergers on Rivals: Gains to Being Left Outside a Merger," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1365-1395, December.
    9. Hossain, Mohammed Sawkat, 2021. "Merger & Acquisitions (M&As) as an important strategic vehicle in business: Thematic areas, research avenues & possible suggestions," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Kashlak, Roger, 1998. "Establishing financial targets for joint ventures in emerging countries: A conceptual model," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 241-258, November.
    11. Neda Trifković, 2018. "Certification and business risk," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-80, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Ferreira, Manuel Portugal & Santos, João Carvalho & de Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro & Reis, Nuno Rosa, 2014. "Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2550-2558.
    13. Aharon, David Y. & Gavious, Ilanit & Yosef, Rami, 2010. "Stock market bubble effects on mergers and acquisitions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 456-470, November.
    14. Neda Trifkovic, 2018. "Certification and business risk," WIDER Working Paper Series 80, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Joseph A. Clougherty & Jin Uk Kim & Bradley R. Skousen & Florian Szücs, 2017. "The Foundations of International Business: Cross-Border Investment Activity and the Balance between Market-Power and Efficiency Effects," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 340-365, May.
    16. Canales, J. Ignacio & Caldart, Adrián, 2017. "Encouraging emergence of cross-business strategic initiatives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 300-313.
    17. Adrian Lüthge, 2020. "The concept of relatedness in diversification research: review and synthesis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-35, February.
    18. Waleed Khalid & Kashif Ur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif, 2019. "The Impact of Merger and Acquisition Firms on Stock Market Bubble," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 335-342, March.
    19. Martin, James & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Dawes, John & Tanusondjaja, Arry & Cohen, Justin & McColl, Bruce & Trinh, Giang, 2020. "Fundamental basket size patterns and their relation to retailer performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Chebat Elise & Roth Yefim & Chebat Jean Charles, 2020. "How Culture Moderates the Effects of Justice in Service Recovery," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 21-41, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-019-09490-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.