IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v53y2004i4p383-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socratic Dialogue as a Tool for Teaching Business Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Morrell

Abstract

Within a supportive learning environment, dialogue can allow for the identification and testing of assumptions and tacit beliefs. It can also illustrate the inadequacies in superficial thinking about ethical problems. Internal dialogue allows us to examine our beliefs, and to prepare and evaluate arguments. Each of these elements is important in the study of business ethics. This paper outlines one teaching technique based on Socratic dialogue, and shows how it can be applied to develop business students' thinking about ethics. After justifying the suitability of this technique, and detailing its key elements, the paper offers for consideration an illustration of how the technique may be applied in a classroom setting, using structured role play. The paper concludes with a “teaching agenda”, offering suggestions for how this technique can be applied to teaching business ethics in an undergraduate, or postgraduate module, where it can examine language, structures and practices. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Morrell, 2004. "Socratic Dialogue as a Tool for Teaching Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 383-392, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:53:y:2004:i:4:p:383-392
    DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043500.63029.40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043500.63029.40
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043500.63029.40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santiago Mejia, 2022. "Socratic Ignorance and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 537-553, January.
    2. Amy David & Amanda S. Mayes & Elizabeth C. Coppola, 2020. "The Effect of Live Theatre on Business Ethics," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 215-230, December.
    3. K. A. Van Peursem & A. Julian, 2006. "Ethics Research: an Accounting Educator's Perspective," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(38), pages 13-29, March.
    4. Stephen Chen, 2010. "The Role of Ethical Leadership Versus Institutional Constraints: A Simulation Study of Financial Misreporting by CEOs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 33-52, June.
    5. Victoria McWilliams & Afsaneh Nahavandi, 2006. "Using Live Cases to Teach Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 421-433, September.
    6. Dolors Setó-Pamies & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2016. "A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 523-538, July.
    7. Denis Collins & James Weber & Rebecca Zambrano, 2014. "Teaching Business Ethics Online: Perspectives on Course Design, Delivery, Student Engagement, and Assessment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 513-529, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:53:y:2004:i:4:p:383-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.