IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/decono/v170y2022i4d10.1007_s10645-022-09411-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust and Distrust in Pension Providers in Times of Decline and Reform: Analysis of Survey Data 2004–2021

Author

Listed:
  • Hendrik P. Dalen

    (Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW)/University of Groningen
    Tilburg University)

  • Kène Henkens

    (Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW)/University of Groningen
    University of Groningen
    University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Trust in pension providers by participants is essential because pension providers try to fulfill their pension promises in a fundamentally uncertain world. Reforms and crises are therefore the ultimate testing ground for pension trust. In this paper we estimate with repeated cross-sectional survey data how trust and distrust in Dutch pension funds and the government have evolved over the period 2004–2021 and what the impact of financial stability on trust in these two institutions has been. Financial stability of pension funds, measured by their funding ratio, is shown to affect trust positively, but it does not decrease distrust significantly. Based on the estimation results, achieving a situation where the majority of the adult population trusts pension funds is likely to be attained at funding ratios of 115 or higher. Financial stability of government (measured by government debt/GDP ratio) does not affect either trust or distrust levels. Underlying drivers of distrust and trust such as personal characteristics are also notable: self-employed are more prone to distrust pension funds than employees. Women are more than men likely to take a neutral position.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendrik P. Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2022. "Trust and Distrust in Pension Providers in Times of Decline and Reform: Analysis of Survey Data 2004–2021," De Economist, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 401-433, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:decono:v:170:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10645-022-09411-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10645-022-09411-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10645-022-09411-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10645-022-09411-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    2. Nicholas Barr & Peter Diamond, 2006. "The Economics of Pensions," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(1), pages 15-39, Spring.
    3. Illoong Kwon & Kitae Sohn, 2021. "Trust or distrust: entrepreneurs vs. self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1553-1570, April.
    4. J. M. Keynes, 1937. "The General Theory of Employment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 209-223.
    5. Jante Parlevliet, 2017. "What drives public acceptance of reforms? Longitudinal evidence from a Dutch pension reform," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Ernst Fehr, 2009. "On The Economics and Biology of Trust," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 235-266, 04-05.
    7. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, C.J.I.M. & Oude Mulders, Jaap, 2019. "Increasing the public pension age : Employers’ concerns and policy preferences," Other publications TiSEM aeddd7fb-7cbc-4853-b7a7-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Lans Bovenberg & Raymond Gradus, 2015. "Reforming occupational pension schemes: the case of the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 244-257, July.
    9. Sunde, Uwe & Dohmen, Thomas, 2016. "Aging and preferences," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 64-68.
    10. Carin van der Cruijsen & Jakob de Haan & Ria Roerink, 2021. "Financial knowledge and trust in financial institutions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 680-714, June.
    11. Johnson, Noel D. & Mislin, Alexandra A., 2011. "Trust games: A meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 865-889.
    12. Carin van der Cruijsen & Nicole Jonker, 2019. "Pension profile preferences: the influence of trust and expected expenses," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(12), pages 1212-1231, March.
    13. Anat R Admati, 2021. "Capitalism, laws, and the need for trustworthy institutions [‘Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment, and Politics’]," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 678-689.
    14. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, Kène, 2021. "Hoe vertrouwen in politiek en maatschappij doorwerkt in vertrouwen in pensioeninstituties," Other publications TiSEM e5020d36-8322-4385-b06e-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. W. Fred Raaij, 2016. "Understanding Consumer Financial Behavior," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-54425-4.
    16. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, Kène, 2021. "Hoe vertrouwen in politiek en maatschappij doorwerkt in vertrouwen in pensioeninstituties," Other publications TiSEM 10f06056-dc05-4994-8341-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. de Beer, Joop & van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, Kene, 2017. "Wanneer voelt de verhoging van de AOW-leeftijd als diefstal?," Other publications TiSEM 4063ee7c-f2c4-4120-b764-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Ulrike Malmendier & Stefan Nagel, 2011. "Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(1), pages 373-416.
    19. Lans Bovenberg & Raymond Gradus, 2015. "Reforming occupational pension schemes: the case of the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 244-257, September.
    20. Berg Joyce & Dickhaut John & McCabe Kevin, 1995. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 122-142, July.
    21. Van Dalen, Hendrik P. & Henkens, Kène & Koedijk, Kees & Slager, Alfred, 2012. "Decision making by pension fund trustees in the face of demographic and economic shocks: a vignette study," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 183-201, April.
    22. Luuk Metselaar & Peter Zwaneveld & Casper Ewijk, 2022. "Reforming Occupational Pensions in the Netherlands: Contract and Intergenerational Aspects," De Economist, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 7-36, February.
    23. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, C.J.I.M. & Kortleve, N., 2022. "Onzekere pensioenuitkomsten verhogen kans van opname ‘bedrag ineens’," Other publications TiSEM f8fee44b-e9f0-444c-a288-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter & Henkens, K., 2022. "Trust and Distrust in Pension Providers in Times of Decline and Reform," Other publications TiSEM 430443a0-b060-42fd-ad9c-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Goeschl, Timo & Jarke, Johannes, 2014. "Trust, but verify? When trustworthiness is observable only through (costly) monitoring," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 20, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    3. Cicognani, Simona & Romagnoli, Giorgia & Soraperra, Ivan, 2024. "Fostering trust: When the rhetoric of sharing can backfire," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Degli Antoni, Giacomo & Grimalda, Gianluca, 2016. "Groups and trust: Experimental evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 38-54.
    5. Zhang, Zhe & Zhang, Xu & Putterman, Louis, 2019. "Trust and cooperation at a confluence of worlds: An experiment in Xinjiang, China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 128-144.
    6. Martin G. Kocher, 2015. "How Trust in Social Dilemmas Evolves with Age," CESifo Working Paper Series 5447, CESifo.
    7. Zubair, Maria & Khanum, Ayesha & Nasir, Marjan, 2018. "Transfer Of Behavioral Traits From Parents To Children: An Experimental Approach," MPRA Paper 92121, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    9. Michal Bauer & Nathan Fiala & Ian Levely, 2018. "Trusting Former Rebels: An Experimental Approach to Understanding Reintegration after Civil War," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(613), pages 1786-1819, August.
    10. Kim, Jeongbin & Putterman, Louis & Zhang, Xinyi, 2022. "Trust, Beliefs and Cooperation: Excavating a Foundation of Strong Economies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Francesco Bogliacino & Gianluca Grimalda & Laura Jiménez & Daniel Reyes Galvis & Cristiano Codagnone, 2022. "Trust and trustworthiness after a land restitution program: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 135-161, June.
    12. Floor Goedkoop & Madi Mangan & Mauro Mastrogiacomo & Stefan Hochguertel, 2023. "Trust in the financial performance of pension funds, public perception, and its effect on participation in voluntary pension saving plans," Working Papers 783, DNB.
    13. Roxanne Kovacs & Maurice Dunaiski & Matteo M. Galizzi & Gianluca Grimalda & Rafael Hortala‐Vallve & Fabrice Murtin & Louis Putterman, 2024. "The determinants of trust: findings from large, representative samples in six OECD countries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(364), pages 1521-1552, October.
    14. Booth, Alison & Meng, Xin & Fan, Elliott & Zhang, Dandan, 2022. "The direct and intergenerational behavioural consequences of a socio-political upheaval," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 931-958.
    15. Schwerter, Frederik & Zimmermann, Florian, 2020. "Determinants of trust: The role of personal experiences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 413-425.
    16. Bigoni, Maria & Bortolotti, Stefania & Casari, Marco & Gambetta, Diego, 2013. "It takes two to cheat: An experiment on derived trust," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 129-146.
    17. Cox, James C. & Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Neururer, Daniel, 2016. "What is trustworthiness and what drives it?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 197-218.
    18. Chen Li & Uyanga Turmunkh & Peter P. Wakker, 2019. "Trust as a decision under ambiguity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 51-75, March.
    19. Bruni, Luigino & Tufano, Fabio, 2017. "The value of vulnerability: The transformative capacity of risky trust," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 408-414, July.
    20. Gerald Eisenkopf & Stephan Nüesch, 2016. "Third Parties and Specific Investments," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(2), pages 151-172, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pensions; Trust; Funding ratio; Pension funds; Government;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:decono:v:170:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10645-022-09411-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.