IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejss/v5y2016i4p506-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship individual characteristics, group characteristics, organizations structure, organizational culture and organizational climate with organizational effectiveness colleges in Malang

Author

Listed:
  • Arie Ambarwati

    (STIE Indonesia Malang, East Java, Indonesia)

  • Sonhadji

    (State University of Malang, East Java, Indonesia)

  • I Nyoman S Degeng
  • Bambang Budi Wiyono

Abstract

This research was an ex post facto research which did not provide any control or manipulation of variables directly by the researchers. Embodiments of the independent variables have occurred naturally or cannot be manipulated, researchers tried to explain the facts that have occurred. The research design used in this research was descriptive-correlational design to obtain information regarding the observed phenomena and to describe the presence or absence of a relationship between the characteristics of individuals and groups, structure, culture and organizational climate of the effectiveness of the organization internally by large-small correlation coefficient. This was a quantitative approach usinf Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based variants method. The independent variables (exogenous) were individual characteristics (X1), and the characteristics of the group (X2), organizational structure (X3), organizational culture (X4) and organizational climate (X5). The effectiveness of the organization was the dependent variable or endogenous variables in this study. The results of modeling the relationship among six variables studied were generated in this study including: (1) the individual characteristics of the lecturers which were not directly related to the effectiveness of the college, (2) characteristics of the group has a direct relationship with effectiveness, and organizational structure, as well as having no relationship directly to the effectiveness of organizations through the organizational structure, (3) organizational structure directly affected the effectiveness of the organization, but did not have any direct contact with the culture and climate of the organization, (4) a direct relationship was significant relationship between culture and organizational climate to organizational effectiveness, as well as the subsequent results the findings in this study were (5) the existence of a significant direct relationship between organizational climate with the culture of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Arie Ambarwati & Sonhadji & I Nyoman S Degeng & Bambang Budi Wiyono, 2016. "Relationship individual characteristics, group characteristics, organizations structure, organizational culture and organizational climate with organizational effectiveness colleges in Malang," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 5(4), pages 506-522, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:506-522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol5/No4/JSSarticle4,5_4_pp506-522.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Wei & Yang, Baiyin & McLean, Gary N., 2010. "Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 763-771, July.
    2. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    3. Chairuman Armia, 2002. "Pengaruh Budaya terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi : Dimensi Budaya Hofstede," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 6(1).
    4. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Development of a Quality Culture," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 11, pages 137-154, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Julian Birkinshaw & Robert Nobel & Jonas Ridderstråle, 2002. "Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, June.
    6. Chairuman Armia, 2002. "Pengaruh Budaya Terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi : Dimensi Budaya Hofstede," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 6(1), pages 103-117, Juni.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neboj?a Jani?ijevi?, 2020. "The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Firm Performance: Organizational Culture As A Magic Wand Or Silent Killer?," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 10613063, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Nebojša Janićijević, 2013. "Matching Compensation System With The Type Of Organizational Culture," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 309-324, September.
    3. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    4. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    7. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    9. Ghulam Mustafa & Richard Glavee-Geo & Kjell Gronhaug & Hanan Saber Almazrouei, 2019. "Structural Impacts on Formation of Self-Efficacy and Its Performance Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Daniel RUSU, 2022. "Association of Knowledge Management with Strategic Management: Directions and Trends at International Level," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 49-66, February.
    12. Barbara A. Wasik & Shira Kolnik Mattera & Chrishana M. Lloyd & Kimberly Boller, 2013. "Intervention Dosage in Early Childhood Care and Education: It's Complicated," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 65bc22bb6a384f7c9b93a8207, Mathematica Policy Research.
    13. Héctor Cuevas-Vargas & Héctor Abraham Cortés-Palacios & Cid Leana-Morales & Eduardo Huerta-Mascotte, 2022. "Absorptive Capacity and Its Dual Effect on Technological Innovation: A Structural Equations Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Azeem, Muhammad & Ahmed, Munir & Haider, Sajid & Sajjad, Muhammad, 2021. "Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    16. Hyo Sun Jung & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2017. "Error management culture and turnover intent among food and beverage employees in deluxe hotels: the mediating effect of job satisfaction," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 785-802, December.
    17. Cheng-Tsung Lu & Yeun-Wen Chang, 2016. "A Study on the Relationship between the Typology of Knowledge-Intensive Businesses (KIBs) and Performance Measurement Systems (PMS): Evidence from Taiwan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1-89, November.
    18. Kocsis, David, 2019. "A conceptual foundation of design and implementation research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Rogerio Morais & José Dirnece Tavares Paes, 2020. "Analysis Of Factors Supporting Swot In Organizational Strategic Planning," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 48(2), pages 38-51.
    20. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:506-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.