IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v12y2023i6p137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of the Dilemma of Continuing Professional Development and Coping Strategies of University Teachers in Remote Areas of China

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Zhang
  • Pengfei Chen
  • Fangyu Xiang
  • Lei Li

Abstract

The continual production and dissemination of diverse information in this digital age is driving higher education institutions to innovate and integrate their knowledge. This further encourages teachers to continually update their professional development. However, as university teachers still encounter numerous difficulties this respect, the purpose of his study is to conduct in-depth qualitative analysis to explore this issue from four perspectives- peer support, external support, collaborative development, and continuous professional development online. By conducting in-depth interviews with 28 administrators and teachers from four northwestern universities in China, this research adopts qualitative methods to explore the current dilemmas in teachers' continuing professional development and information technology ability, and proposes corresponding improvement strategies based on the dilemmas. The results are expected to show that the needs of individual teachers are neglected, there is no plan for complete professional development, and there is a lack of outstanding university management talents in this information society. Therefore, it is suggested that a clear plan for the continuation of teachers’ professional development should be proposed, along with the establishment of a professional development center. At the same time, university teachers should take the initiative to enhance their personal growth, and university administrators’ foresight should not be ignored. The continuing professional development of university teachers in remote areas can only be achieved with unified cooperation in various aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Zhang & Pengfei Chen & Fangyu Xiang & Lei Li, 2023. "Study of the Dilemma of Continuing Professional Development and Coping Strategies of University Teachers in Remote Areas of China," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(6), pages 137-137, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/24630/15529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/24630
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Davies & Joe Hirschberg & Jenny Lye & Carol Johnston & Ian Mcdonald, 2007. "Systematic Influences On Teaching Evaluations: The Case For Caution," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 18-38, March.
    2. Nor Hazana Abdullah & Alina Shamsuddin & Eta Wahab & Muazu Hassan Muazu, 2018. "Participation in continuous professional development training and perceived teaching assessment: A case study at the Malaysian Technical University," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(3), pages 530-541, June.
    3. Abdullah, Nor Hazana & Shamsuddin, Alina & Wahab, Eta & Muazu, Muazu Hassan, 2018. "Participation in continuous professional development training and perceived teaching assessment: A case study at the Malaysian Technical University," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 14(3), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rieger, Matthias & Voorvelt, Katherine, 2016. "Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations: Evidence from mixed teaching teamsAuthor-Name: Wagner, Natascha," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 79-94.
    2. Joe Hirschberg & Jenny Lye & Martin Davies & Carol Johnston, 2011. "Measuring Student Experience: Relationships between Teaching Quality Instruments (TQI) and Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1134, The University of Melbourne.
    3. Benjamin Artz & David M. Welsch, 2013. "The Effect of Student Evaluations on Academic Success," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 8(1), pages 100-119, January.
    4. Berezvai, Zombor & Lukáts, Gergely Dániel & Molontay, Roland, 2019. "A pénzügyi ösztönzők hatása az egyetemi oktatók osztályozási gyakorlatára [How financially rewarding student evaluation may affect grading behaviour. Evidence from a natural experiment]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 733-750.
    5. Bredtmann, Julia & Crede, Carsten J. & Otten, Sebastian, 2013. "Methods for evaluating educational programs: Does Writing Center Participation affect student achievement?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 115-123.
    6. Donghun Cho & Joonmo Cho, 2017. "Does More Accurate Knowledge of Course Grade Impact Teaching Evaluation?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 12(2), pages 224-240, Spring.
    7. Joe Hirschberg & Jenny Lye, 2014. "The influence of student experiences on post-graduation surveys," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1187, The University of Melbourne.
    8. Joonmo Cho & Wonyoung Baek, 2019. "Identifying Factors Affecting the Quality of Teaching in Basic Science Education: Physics, Biological Sciences, Mathematics, and Chemistry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Yoav Gal & Adiv Gal, 2014. "Knowledge Bias: Is There a Link Between Students’ Feedback and the Grades They Expect to Get from the Lecturers They Have Evaluated? A Case Study of Israeli Colleges," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 597-615, September.
    10. Cho, Donghun & Baek, Wonyoung & Cho, Joonmo, 2015. "Why do good performing students highly rate their instructors? Evidence from a natural experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 172-179.
    11. Wagner, N. & Rieger, M. & Voorvelt, K.J., 2016. "Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations : Evidence from mixed teaching teams," ISS Working Papers - General Series 617, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    12. Marco p. Tucci & Sandra Fontani & Silvia Ferrini, 2008. "L’ “R-Factor”: un nuovo modo di valutare la ricerca scientifica," Department of Economics University of Siena 527, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    13. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky, 2011. "Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 641-653, August.
    14. De Witte, Kristof & Rogge, Nicky, 2009. "Accounting for exogenous influences in a benevolent performance evaluation of teachers," Working Papers 2009/15, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    15. Timothy A. Bodisco & Stuart Palmer, 2020. "Presentation and Evaluation of a New Graduate Unit of Study in Engineering Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Amalia Vanacore & Maria Sole Pellegrino, 2019. "How Reliable are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)? A Study to Test Student’s Reproducibility and Repeatability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 77-89, November.
    17. Silvia Ferrini & Marco P. Tucci, 2011. "Evaluating Research Activity:Impact Factor vs. Research Factor," Department of Economics University of Siena 614, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.