IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujspc/v0y2020i79p55-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

İnsana Yakışır İş Açığı: Çalışan Yoksulluğu Açısından Bir Değerlendirme Endüstri İlişkileri Temelinde Türk Endüstri İlişkileri Sisteminin Modernizasyonu

Author

Listed:
  • Sefa Kaya

    (Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye., Marmara Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

Günümüzde hem gelişmiş ülkelerin hem de gelişmekte olan ülkelerin karşılaştığı en temel sorunlardan biri çalışan yoksulluğudur. Nitekim bireylerin istihdam edilmelerine rağmen, elde edilen ücret düzeyi yoksulluktan kurtulmak için yeterli olmamaktadır. Diğer taraftan güvencenin ve korumanın yetersiz olduğu ya da hiç olmadığı işler yaygın olarak bulunmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, çalışan yoksulluğu, işsizlik ve güvencesizlik gibi sorunların hissedilmesi ile birlikte insana yakışır iş kavramı gündeme gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, dünyada işe insana yakışır olma özelliği kazandıran niteliklerin bulunmadığı işleri ifade eden, insana yakışır iş açığı kavramını ve bu kavramın bir göstergesi olarak çalışan yoksulluğu sorununu konu edinmiştir. Çalışmada, insana yakışır olmayan işler ile çalışanların yoksullaşması arasındaki ilişkiyi ifade edebilmek ve çalışan yoksulluğu ile mücadelede, insana yakışır iş yaklaşımının önemli olduğuna konusuna dikkat çekebilmek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışan yoksulluğu gelişmiş ülkelerde de bulunmakla birlikte, önemli ölçüde gelişmekte olan ülkelerde yaygınlaşmaktadır. Özellikle Sahra Altı Afrika ve Güney Asya bölgesinde aşırı ve/veya ılımlı/orta çalışan yoksulluğu önemli bir sorun olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışan yoksulluğu ile kısmi süreli ve geçici çalışma kapsamında çalışma arasında pozitif bir ilişkinin bulunduğu, ayrıca savunmasız istihdam kategorisinde çalışanların yoksullaşma risklerinin daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Suggested Citation

  • Sefa Kaya, 2020. "İnsana Yakışır İş Açığı: Çalışan Yoksulluğu Açısından Bir Değerlendirme Endüstri İlişkileri Temelinde Türk Endüstri İlişkileri Sisteminin Modernizasyonu," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(79), pages 55-106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2020:i:79:p:55-106
    DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3E630E3C13ED4D968D560021DAE02A75
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/journal/jspc/article/insana-yakisir-is-acigi-calisan-yoksullugu-acisindan-bir-degerlendirme
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronaldo Munck, 2013. "The Precariat: a view from the South," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 747-762.
    2. Brendan Burchell & Kirsten Sehnbruch & Agnieszka Piasna & Nurjk Agloni, 2014. "The quality of employment and decent work: definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(2), pages 459-477.
    3. Dharam GHAI, 2003. "Decent work: Concept and indicators," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(2), pages 113-145, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DEGUILHEM Thibaud & FRONTENAUD Adrien, 2016. "Quality of employment regimes and diversity of emerging countries," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2016-03, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    2. Anna Fabry & Monica Schuster & Miet Maertens, 2024. "Decent and equal work in agri‐food systems: Evidence from Peru," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 803-830, June.
    3. PATACHE, Laura & CHIRU, Claudiu & BEBEȘELEA, Mihaela, 2018. "Rural Employment And Decent Work In Romania," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 18(2), pages 53-62.
    4. Kaijing Xue & Dingde Xu & Shaoquan Liu, 2019. "Social Network Influences on Non-Agricultural Employment Quality for Part-Time Peasants: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Deguilhem, Thibaud & Frontenaud, Adrien, 2016. "Régimes de qualité de l’emploi et diversité des pays émergents," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 19.
    6. Mauricio Apablaza & Kirsten Sehnbruch & Pablo González & Rocío Méndez, 2023. "Regional inequality in multidimensional quality of employment: insights from Chile, 1996–2017," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 416-433, March.
    7. Virginia Navajas-Romero & Rosalía Díaz-Carrión & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2019. "Decent Work as Determinant of Work Engagement on Dependent Self-Employed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Green, Francis, 2021. "Decent Work and The Quality of Work and Employment," GLO Discussion Paper Series 817, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Sehnbruch, Kirsten & González, Pablo & Apablaza, Mauricio & Méndez, Rocío & Arriagada, Verónica, 2020. "The Quality of Employment (QoE) in nine Latin American countries: A multidimensional perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Elisa Pascucci, 2019. "The local labour building the international community: Precarious work within humanitarian spaces," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 743-760, May.
    11. Natalia Flores Garrido, 2020. "Precarity From a Feminist Perspective: A Note on Three Elements for the Political Struggle," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 582-590, September.
    12. Joshua Greenstein, 2020. "The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality among US Workers: 1980–2018," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 447-469, September.
    13. Hermanus Stephanus Geyer Jr, 2023. "Precarious and non-precarious work in the informal sector: Evidence from South Africa," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1915-1931, August.
    14. Mark G. L. Tebboth & Catherine Locke, 2024. "Rural modernization and the remaking of the rural citizen in China: Village redevelopment, migration and precarity," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1129-1149, March.
    15. Joseph Choonara, 2020. "The Precarious Concept of Precarity," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 427-446, September.
    16. André Dumas Tsambou & Lionie Mafang & Thierno Malick Diallo & Benjamin Fomba Kamga, 2024. "Impact of job training program on employment outcomes in Senegal," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(8), pages 1-33, August.
    17. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Tatiana Karabchuk, 2020. "Job Instability and Fertility Intentions of Young Adults in Europe: Does Labor Market Legislation Matter?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 688(1), pages 225-245, March.
    19. Valentina Franca & Suzana Laporšek & Ana Arzenšek, 2018. "How to Tackle New Form of Works for a Greater Employment Protection," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    20. Menekse SAHIN & Dogan DEMIRCI, 2014. "Perceptions of Disabled Rights in Global Governance Models," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 1(1), pages 263-269, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2020:i:79:p:55-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.