IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v9y2017i4p288-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Discrete Event Model of Viability Building in a Public University Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Virginia Ecaterina Oltean

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Theodor Borangiu

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Monica Drăgoicea

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of today’s interconnected world, public higher education is confronted with a shift of its role from public good to public service, which is accompanied by new challenges in building and maintaining the viability of public universities. There is a vast literature on this topic, but there is not yet reported a systematic approach in modeling the basic steps of decision making and problem solving to be completed by a public university to remain viable. Starting from the concepts of service system, and consonance and resonance as key viability conditions, this paper proposes a discrete event model of the viability building and maintaining process in a generic public university organization. The model evolution is driven by events conditioned by internal, external, or mixed causes. Some of the uncontrollable events occurring in the process may drive the discrete evolution to disturbance rejection states, where specific recovery strategies are applied. If recovery is successful, disturbances may become sources of innovation. The discrete event model can be used as a theoretical and conceptual tool for building and testing instances of the viability building and maintaining processes in public universities, and also for refining academic evaluation criteria by the authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Virginia Ecaterina Oltean & Theodor Borangiu & Monica Drăgoicea, 2017. "A Discrete Event Model of Viability Building in a Public University Organization," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 288-301, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:288-301
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2017.0184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2017.0184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2017.0184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romero, Laura & Rey, Elena del, 2004. "Competition between public and private universities: quality, prices and exams," UC3M Working papers. Economics we046423, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    2. Jim Spohrer & Stephen K. Kwan, 2009. "Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): An Emerging Discipline - Outline & References," International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Tarek H. Selim, 2008. "The Education Market in Egypt: A Game Theory Approach," Working Papers 422, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2008.
    4. Camelia STEJAR, 2011. "Higher Education: Public Good Or Public Service? Analysis From The Perspective Of Internationalization Of Education," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(1), Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lino Cinquini & Andrea Tenucci, 2011. "Management Accounting for Service: A Research Agenda," Working Papers 201102, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Istituto di Management.
    2. Cremer, Helmuth & Maldonado, Dario, 2013. "Mixed oligopoly in education," IDEI Working Papers 766, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    3. Ziad R. Ghandour, 2019. "Public-Private Competition in Regulated Markets," NIPE Working Papers 02/2019, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    4. Joan Rosselló Villalonga, 2013. "Stratification of Public Universities and Students’ Segregation," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 205(2), pages 99-124, June.
    5. Joan Roselló Villalonga, 2017. "Does Decentralization in the Provision of Higher Education Increase Quality of Education?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 220(1), pages 13-55, March.
    6. Joan Rosselló, 2007. "Does a public university system avoid the stratification of public universities and the segregation of students?," DEA Working Papers 26, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Departament d'Economía Aplicada.
    7. Nihat Kamil Anil & Gulnur Eti Icli, 2013. "MBA sudents' satisfaction and loyality: state vs. private universities in Turkey," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(2), pages 177-198.
    8. Rim Lahmandi‐Ayed & Hejer Lasram & Didier Laussel, 2021. "Is partial privatization of universities a solution for higher education?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(6), pages 1174-1198, December.
    9. De Donder, Philippe & Roemer, John E., 2009. "Mixed oligopoly equilibria when firms' objectives are endogenous," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 414-423, May.
    10. Esperanza Marcos & Valeria De Castro & María-Luz Martín-Peña & Juan Manuel Vara, 2020. "Training New Professionals in Service Engineering: Towards a Transdisciplinary Curriculum for Sustainable Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Martin Jetter & Gerhard Satzger & Andreas Neus, 2009. "Technological Innovation and Its Impact on Business Model, Organization and Corporate Culture – IBM’s Transformation into a Globally Integrated, Service-Oriented Enterprise," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(1), pages 37-45, February.
    12. Bassano, Clara & Piciocchi, Paolo & Spohrer, James (Jim) C. & Pietronudo, Maria Cristina, 2018. "Managing value co-creation in consumer service systems within smart retail settings," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 190-197.
    13. Serguei Mikhailitchenko, 2022. "Knowledge And Higher Education: Public/Private ‘Goods’ Divide," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 16(1), pages 8-15.
    14. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Hejer Lasram & Didier Laussel, 2020. "Is partial privatization of universities a solution for higher education? A successive monopolies model," Working Papers hal-02988323, HAL.
    15. Joan Rosselló Villalonga, 2013. "¿Importa la calidad de las Universidades en la elección de los estudiantes?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 207(4), pages 41-70, December.
    16. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:9:y:2005:i:6:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Piróg Danuta, 2016. "Key processes shaping the current role and operation of higher education institutions in society," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 53-59, March.
    18. Matteo Gaeta & Francesca Loia & Debora Sarno & Luca Carrubbo, 2021. "Online Social Network Viability: Misinformation Management Based on Service and Systems Theories," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Rokicki Arkadiusz & Nogalski Bogdan, 2021. "Service Management as a Subdiscipline of Management Science," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 136-174, September.
    20. Joan Rosselló-Villalonga, 2007. "¿Debería tener las universidades total autonomía en la selección del profesorado," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 31(3), pages 374-414, September.
    21. Del Rey Elena & Estevan Fernanda, 2020. "Assessing Higher Education Policy in Brazil: A Mixed Oligopoly Approach," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:288-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.